[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (4) :119-126    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
施工顺序及不同管材对双层顶管隧道施工引起地表沉降的影响研究
1 广州市市政集团有限公司,广州 510060;2 广州市市政集团市政工程技术研究院,广州 510060)
Influence of Construction Sequence and Different Types of Pipes on Ground Surface Settlement Caused by the Construction of Two-layer Jacking-pipes
(1 Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060; 2 Municipal Engineering Technology Research Institute,Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510060)
Download: PDF (4041KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 针对双层顶管施工引起地表沉降的问题及其影响因素,文章借助有限元软件建立三维模型,综合考虑机头正面推力、地层损失及注浆的共同作用,模拟计算顶管施工过程,探讨顶管施工顺序及管材对地表沉降的影响。结果表明:上下双层顶管施工引起的地层最大沉降出现在下层顶管上侧,并随着上层顶管开挖该值降低17.84%,下侧隆起值变化不大;双层顶管施工引起地表沉降的主要影响区域在顶管轴线前后及左右-3.2D1~3.2D1范围内;先行施工的下层顶管引起的地表最大沉降占总沉降的78.05%;后续上层顶管的开挖导致机头前方隆起明显,表现为总沉降减少,机头通过后地表沉降增加,最大增加21.95%,并随着顶管推进地表隆起增加及衰减的速率都有所降低;先施工上层顶管引起的地表沉降较先施工下层顶管工况增加20.5%,增幅较大;混凝土顶管施工引起的地表沉降大于钢顶管,最大增加26.13%,且地表主要受影响范围增大为-4.8D1~4.8D1。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
安关峰 1
2 王 谭 1
2 司海峰 1
2 刘添俊 1
2
关键词:   
Abstract: Aiming at the ground surface settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction and its influen? tial factors, a three-dimensional model was established by finite element software to simulate and calculate pipejacking construction under considering interaction of bulkhead pressure, ground loss and grouting, to discuss the impact of construction sequence and pipe type on ground surface settlement. The results show that the maximum settlement caused by two-layer jacking-pipes construction occurs on the upper side of the lower jacking pipe and it reduces by 17.84% with the excavation of upper jacking-pipe, and the heaving at lower side barely changes; the main affected area of ground surface settlement is within the scope of - 3.2D1~3.2D1 around the jacking-pipe axis; the maximum ground surface settlement caused by the antecedent construction of the lower jacking-pipe occupies 78.05% of the total settlement; subsequent excavation of the upper jacking-pipe results in obvious heaving in front of it, the total settlement decreases and ground surface settlement increases after passing of jacking-pipe head, the maximum settlement increases by 21.95%, the increasing and attenuation rates of ground heaving both reduce with the advance of jacking-pipe; the ground surface settlement caused by the precedent construction of the upper-layer jacking-pipe increases largely by 20.5% compared with that of precedent construction of the lower-layer jackingpipe; the ground surface settlement caused by concrete jacking-pipe is larger than that of steel jacking-pipe, the maximum settlement increases by 26.13% and the affected scope increases to -4.8D1~4.8D1.
KeywordsPipe jacking construction;Two-layer jacking-pipes;Ground surface settlement;Construction se? quence,   Pipe type,   Numerical analysis     
基金资助:基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAK11B00);科技计划项目(2016-KJ002).
作者简介: 作者简介:安关峰(1970-),男,博士后,教授级高级工程师,主要从事市政工程施工技术研究与管理工作,E-mail:anguanfeng@126.com.
引用本文:   
安关峰 1, 2 王 谭 1, 2 司海峰 1等 .施工顺序及不同管材对双层顶管隧道施工引起地表沉降的影响研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2019,V56(4): 119-126
AN Guanfeng1, 2 WANG Tan1, 2 SI Haifeng1 etc .Influence of Construction Sequence and Different Types of Pipes on Ground Surface Settlement Caused by the Construction of Two-layer Jacking-pipes[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(4): 119-126
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2019/V56/I4/119
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 邓铭江 1 谭忠盛 2.超特长隧洞集群TBM试掘进阶段存在的问题与施工技术发展方向[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 1-12
[2] 宋勇军 车永新 任建喜 张 琨.锚固岩石蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 13-18
[3] 严耿升 1,2 何小亮 1,2 韩金明 3 赵 爽 3 赵 成 1,2.盾构隧道工程中砂卵石地层勘察技术分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 19-25
[4] 张 恒 张 港 孙建春 朱亦墨 陈寿根.Q值与围岩力学参数的相关性分析与工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 26-34
[5] 李俊达 1,2 李远富 1,2 李世琦 1,3 刘 凯 1,3 王广开 1,2.基于CBR的山区铁路隧道开挖方法辅助决策模型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 35-41
[6] 王秋懿 1 杨 奎 2 毛金龙 2 杨清源 3 赵伯明 3.九度地震区公路隧道二次衬砌结构抗震综合措施研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 42-49
[7] 赵立财 1,2 余建星 1.长大隧道斜井快速掘进设计方案优化及工期测算[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 50-57
[8] 汪 旭 1 孟 露 1 杨 刚 2 卢 松 1.隧道超前地质预报多源地震干涉法成像结果影响因素研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 58-66
[9] 唐 斌 徐文平.瓦斯隧道施工机械车辆防爆改装形式探讨及建议[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 67-71
[10] 蔡亚宁 张晋勋 武福美.《GB50446-2017盾构法隧道施工与验收规范》中管片部分章节的修订简介[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 72-76
[11] 陈 曦 1 赵 勇 2 杨玉顺 3.岩体力学参数对隧道围岩稳定性的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 77-84
[12] 刘司伟 1 杨红运 1,2 潘瑞凯 1.巷道复合顶板分层厚度反演研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 85-91
[13] 李风云.某地铁车站开挖边坡失稳影响因素上限分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 92-97
[14] 崔光耀 1 王雪来 1 左奎现 1 王明年 2 荆鸿飞 3.强震区高岩温隧道刚柔并济综合减灾技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 98-103
[15] 王 星 1 覃 维 2 马 佳 3 王 蕾 1.公路隧道通风系统局部结构阻力研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019,56(5): 104-113
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术