[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (2) :117-126    DOI:
分析与计算 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
基于两种拱盖法修建的青岛地区上软下硬岩质地层大跨隧道结构稳定性研究
(中铁隧道勘察设计研究院有限公司,广州 511400)
Study on Structural Stability of Mined Large-Span Tunnels Constructed by Two Arch-Cover Methods in Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Rock Stratum of Qingdao Area
(China Railway Tunnel Consultants Co., Ltd. , Guangzhou 511400)
Download: PDF (5316KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 拱盖法是基于纵深刚度差异较大的“上软下硬”地层条件,在充分吸取盖挖法、双侧壁导坑法等工法的成功经验或者不足之处的基础上发展起来的一种暗挖大跨隧道修建技术,拱盖法主要有双层初期支护拱盖法和二次衬砌拱盖法。文章以青岛地铁某暗挖大跨车站为例,结合站址范围内上软下硬复合地层的特征,通过数值方法对两种拱盖法修筑的隧道结构稳定性进行分析研究。结果表明:1)二次衬砌拱盖法采用纵向9 m拆撑安全步距施工时,外层初期支护棚护作用的“空间刚度效应”不足以弥补其拱盖的“拱”效应,双层初期支护拱盖法修筑技术更有利于隧道变形控制;2)隧道下部岩体开挖时拱盖结构的承载、保护作用显著,但在相同等地质环境条件下,二次衬砌拱盖法施工对拱脚岩体的塑性破坏作用更明显,换言之即二次衬砌拱脚对岩基的强度和刚度要求更高;3)初期支护拱盖法结构受力控制部位为拱肩及拱脚,二次衬砌拱盖法结构受力控制部位为拱脚,后者拱脚控制内力约为前者的1.56倍,前者的“梁”效应比较明显,后者的“脚”效应比较明显;4)为地铁百年服务工程安全计,建议优先考虑采用双层初期支护拱盖法施工。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
施玉晶
关键词:   
Abstract: As for the upper-soft and lower-hard rock stratum with larger stiffness differences in vertical depth, the arch-cover method is developed based on the cover-excavation method and double side heading method. The archcover method includes the arch-cover method with double-layer primary support and the arch-cover method with secondly lining. Taking a mined large-span station of Qingdao metro as an example, a numerical analysis on structural stability of the tunnel constructed by two arch-over methods is conducted in light of the characteristics of the upper-soft and lower-hard rock stratum. The results show that: (1) as for the arch-cover method with secondary lining, when tunnel is constructed at a safe strut dismantling distance of 9 m in longitudinal direction, the "spatial stiffness effect" of shed protection of outer primary support can′ t make up for the "arch" effect of arch-cover, the construction technology of arch-cover method with double-layer primary support is more conducive to tunnel deformation control; (2) the arch-cover structure has significant bearing and protection functions during excavating the lower part of the tunnel, however, the plastic damage of rock mass at arch springing is more obvious during the construction by arch-cover method with secondary lining under the same geological conditions, in other words, the arch springing of secondary lining requires higher strength and rigidity of the rock foundation; (3) the internal force con? trol positions of structure by arch-cover method with double-layer primary support are spandrel and arch springing,and the control position is the arch springing for the structure by arch-cover method with secondary lining, the control internal force of arch springing of the latter is about 1.56 times of that of the former, the "beam" effect of the former is more obvious while the "foot" effect of the latter is more obvious; (4) from the perspective of safety, it is suggested that the arch-cover method with double-layer primary support should be adopted.
KeywordsArch-cover method with double-layer primary support,   Arch-cover method with secondary lining,   Up? per-soft and lower-hard stratum,   Settlement,   Plastic zone,   Internal force analysis,   Engineering cost-performance ratio     
作者简介: 作者简介:施玉晶(1986-),男,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面研究工作,E-mail:175404664@qq.com.
引用本文:   
施玉晶 .基于两种拱盖法修建的青岛地区上软下硬岩质地层大跨隧道结构稳定性研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2020,V57(2): 117-126
SHI Yujing .Study on Structural Stability of Mined Large-Span Tunnels Constructed by Two Arch-Cover Methods in Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Rock Stratum of Qingdao Area[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(2): 117-126
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2020/V57/I2/117
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 马 辉 1 高明忠 2.基于系统工程方法论的川藏铁路隧道工程建设管理探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 1-8
[2] 王明年 1,2 郭晓晗 1,2 于 丽 1,2 李春荟 1,2 陈树汪 3.高海拔特长铁路隧道紧急救援站位置选型研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 9-14
[3] 李 畅 1,2,3 王 刚 1,2 仇文革 1,2,3 龚 伦 1,2 赵迎春 4 王秋会 4.限阻器在高水平地应力隧道支护中的研究与应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 15-29
[4] 廖 军 1 董 谦 1 梁洪永 2 简 波 2 石豫川 1,3 龚洪苇 1.近水平红层公路隧道围岩分级指标初探[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 25-29
[5] 卢 松 1,2 汪 旭 1,2 李苍松 1,2 孟 露 1,2.应用HSP法的TBM隧道施工地质预报技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 30-35
[6] 钟祖良 1,2 高国富 1,2 陈 鹏 1 严 如 1.重庆两江船舶观光隧道设计方案探讨[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 36-42
[7] 黄福杰 何则干 张为民 刘珊珊.BIM技术在沉管隧道工程设计中的应用研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 43-48
[8] 唐晓松 1,2 郑颖人 3 王永甫 1.有限元强度折减法在隧道施工稳定分析与控制中的应用[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 49-55
[9] 吴 波 1, 2 兰扬斌 1,2 杨仕升 1,2 杨建新 3 庞晓瑜 3.基于强度折减动力分析法的围岩稳定性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 56-64
[10] 周翠英 1, 2 李 昂 2,3 刘 镇 1,2.平行褶皱构造对隧道围岩变形的影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 65-74
[11] 马 莉 1 刘亚朋 2 李 盛 3,4 吕文达 5 谢 超 3,4 代金鹏 3,4.不同减载措施下高填黄土拱形明洞结构受力研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 75-84
[12] 张丙武 1 张 鹏 1 戴振华 2 吴银河 2 罗 卫 2.河底地铁盾构隧道管片受力特征分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 85-90
[13] 隋 心 1 张正维 1 闵 绚 2 DOWNIE Steven 3 PADHANI Shahid3 赵丽博 4.超长GIL综合管廊SF6气体泄露模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 91-98
[14] 张珂峰.前伏溶洞巷道开挖突水数值模拟研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 99-107
[15] 张 研 1, 2 王 伟 2 邓雪沁 2.基于相关向量机的TBM掘进速度预测模型[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020,57(3): 108-114
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术