Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (4) :273-    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Assembly Force and Waterproofing Performance of Segment Sealing Gasket in High Water Pressure Shield Tunnels
 
(1. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (5352KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Guide  
Abstract To investigate the assembly force and waterproofing performance of segment sealing gaskets in high water pressure shield tunnels, this paper analyzes the major factors that affect the characteristics of gasket deformation,the growth law of assembly force, and the water-resistant pressure of seven sealing gaskets with different cross-setional forms in different compression stages, based on the Shangyuanmen Cross-river Tunnel Project and through different means such as assembly force test, water pressure test and numerical simulation. The results show that the compression process of the gaskets can be divided into three stages: Stage I when the sealing assembly force increases almost linearly; Stage Ⅱ when the increase of the assembly force slows; and Stage Ⅲ when the compression increases rapidly to the maximum assembly force. The greater the maximum assembly force and maximum compression of the gaskets are, the higher their water-resistant pressure will be, the more steadily their assembly force would increase with the growth rate of compression, and the more conducive it will be for their waterproof performance. For different cross-sectional forms and under the same groove form of the segment, the higher the height of a gasket is, the greater its maximum compression will be in general, and the greater the assembly force will be when the shield segment joint is completely closed. Furthermore, the triangular closed-hole type is better than other hole types, and gaskets with a whole rubber joint on the bottom are better than those with a comb-tooth structure on the bottom.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WEN Yanxin1 HUO Yongpeng2 WU Yue2 CHANG Xin1 ZHANG Tian2 YAN Qixiang2
KeywordsShield tunnel   Waterproof of segment joint   Elastic sealing gasket   Indoor test   Numerical simulation     
Abstract: To investigate the assembly force and waterproofing performance of segment sealing gaskets in high water pressure shield tunnels, this paper analyzes the major factors that affect the characteristics of gasket deformation,the growth law of assembly force, and the water-resistant pressure of seven sealing gaskets with different cross-setional forms in different compression stages, based on the Shangyuanmen Cross-river Tunnel Project and through different means such as assembly force test, water pressure test and numerical simulation. The results show that the compression process of the gaskets can be divided into three stages: Stage I when the sealing assembly force increases almost linearly; Stage Ⅱ when the increase of the assembly force slows; and Stage Ⅲ when the compression increases rapidly to the maximum assembly force. The greater the maximum assembly force and maximum compression of the gaskets are, the higher their water-resistant pressure will be, the more steadily their assembly force would increase with the growth rate of compression, and the more conducive it will be for their waterproof performance. For different cross-sectional forms and under the same groove form of the segment, the higher the height of a gasket is, the greater its maximum compression will be in general, and the greater the assembly force will be when the shield segment joint is completely closed. Furthermore, the triangular closed-hole type is better than other hole types, and gaskets with a whole rubber joint on the bottom are better than those with a comb-tooth structure on the bottom.
KeywordsShield tunnel,   Waterproof of segment joint,   Elastic sealing gasket,   Indoor test,   Numerical simulation     
Fund: 
Cite this article:   
WEN Yanxin1 HUO Yongpeng2 WU Yue2 CHANG Xin1 ZHANG Tian2 YAN Qixiang2 .Assembly Force and Waterproofing Performance of Segment Sealing Gasket in High Water Pressure Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(4): 273-
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I4/273
 
No references of article
[1] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[2] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[3] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[4] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[5] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[6] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
[7] JIA Yonggang1 HAO Zihan1 LU Weidong1 WU Fan1 YANG Weiwei2.Mechanical Behavior of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Segments with Different Joint Configurations[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 182-196
[8] TAN Xinyu1 WEI Meng1,2 LAN Lingshen1 SHANG Qiang1 ZHANG Haitao1.Experimental Test and Mechanism Study on Soil Adhesion Reduction Techniques for Mud Cake Formation on Shield Cutterheads[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 219-229
[9] LIU Pengfei1,2 ZENG Dexing2 WANG Xiao3 YANG Zhao2 LI Yu2.Experimental Evaluation and Application Study on the Shield Muck Cake Decomposition Agents[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 230-237
[10] LUO Long1 ZHU Kaicheng2 HAN Yuxuan3 CAI Dong4 LIU Zheqi5 WANG Jun6.Research on Optimization of Construction Methods for Ultra-large Cross-section Tunnels: A Case Study of the Lihuashan Tunnel on the Tianfu New Area-Qionglai Expressway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 273-282
[11] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[12] GE Zhenghui ZHENG Jianguo1 LI Xinzhi CHEN Peng3 NING Zhiwei WANG Pengcheng2.Field Measurement and Numerical Study on Deformation Behavior of Initial Supports with Different Arch Types[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[13] HU Yunjin1,2,3 ZHU Mingwei GAO Huicai REN Zhihao1,2,3.null[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 50-59
[14] LI Yuhua1 GAO Yawei ZHONG Qiufeng1 QIN Lixuan2 LI Junjie CHENG Zhiming2 HUANG Yonghui.Study on the Blasting Effect of Tunnel Wedge Cut under Different Cut Hole Angles[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 108-116
[15] LI Hanyuan1,2 FENG Jin1 GUO Hongyu1 XIE Xiongyao2 ZHOU Hongsheng1 SUN Fei.Study on the Combined Bearing Mechanical Characteristics of the Double-layer Lining Structure of Subsea Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 126-138
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY