Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2011, Vol. 48 Issue (3) :53-58    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Seismic Response Analysis on Super Large-diameter Undersea Shied Tunnel under High Seismic Intensity
(CCCC Second Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Wuhan  430056)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract  Seismic response analysis on super large-diameter undersea shied tunnel under high seismic intensity was carried out using the software FLAC3D by dynamic finite element method. Results indicated that: 1, Compared with the action of gravitational stress field, the structural internal forces will be increased by seismic action, with the crown and spandrel as the weak places; 2, Under the combined action of gravity and earthquake, tensile stresses of lining mainly occured near the crown, with the max. tensile stress exceeding the designed tensile strength of C60 concrete, possibly resulting in local dropping of lining segment at crown; 3, The maximum stresses and displacements of lining usually occured within 2~6 seconds after earthquake; 4, Variation regulation of time-history curves of displacements, bending moments, shear forces and axial forces was similar; 5, The maximum horizontal displacement and vertical displacement of tunnel lining were 3.6 cm and 3.7 cm respectively.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Ji-Guo
Guo-Xiao-Hong
Cheng-Yong
Keywords High seismic intensity   Super large diameter   Undersea shield tunnel   Seismic response analysis     
Abstract:  Seismic response analysis on super large-diameter undersea shied tunnel under high seismic intensity was carried out using the software FLAC3D by dynamic finite element method. Results indicated that: 1, Compared with the action of gravitational stress field, the structural internal forces will be increased by seismic action, with the crown and spandrel as the weak places; 2, Under the combined action of gravity and earthquake, tensile stresses of lining mainly occured near the crown, with the max. tensile stress exceeding the designed tensile strength of C60 concrete, possibly resulting in local dropping of lining segment at crown; 3, The maximum stresses and displacements of lining usually occured within 2~6 seconds after earthquake; 4, Variation regulation of time-history curves of displacements, bending moments, shear forces and axial forces was similar; 5, The maximum horizontal displacement and vertical displacement of tunnel lining were 3.6 cm and 3.7 cm respectively.
Keywords High seismic intensity,   Super large diameter,   Undersea shield tunnel,   Seismic response analysis     
Cite this article:   
LIU Ji-Guo, Guo-Xiao-Hong, Cheng-Yong .Seismic Response Analysis on Super Large-diameter Undersea Shied Tunnel under High Seismic Intensity[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2011,V48(3): 53-58
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2011/V48/I3/53
 
No references of article
[1] LI Jidong1,2 YOU Xinhua1.Seismic Response of the Metro Station with Pre-constructed Pipe-roof Integrating Support and Structure under Strong Earthquake Effect[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(3): 72-78
[2] WANG Bo-1, GUO Xin-Xin-1, HE Chuan-1, WU De-Xing-2.[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 1-10
[3] .[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 166-173
[4] HU Hongyun1,2 ZHOU Xiaojun1,2 LIU Jianguo1,2 CHEN Tao3.Seismic Response Law of a Tunnel in a Stratified Rock Mass[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(5): 44-53
[5] CHOU Wen-Ge- Duan-Dong-Ya- Li-Bing-Tian- Hu- Hui- Dai- Yong.Design and Verification of a Model Test Box for Tunnel Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,53(6): 129-136
[6] Tuo Yongfei, Guo Xiaohong.General Design and Key Technologies of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 1-6
[7] Lin Xin1, Shu Heng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Yang Linsong1, Li Jin1, Guo Xiaohong1.Study of the Longitudial Profile Optimization of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels in Mixed Ground with Very High Water Pressure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 7-14
[8] Yao Zhanhu1, Yang Zhao2, Tian Yi1, Hu Huitao1.Key Construction Technology for the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 15-23
[9] Li Xinyu, Zhang Dingli, Fang Qian, Song Haoran.On Water Burst Patterns in Underwater Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 24-31
[10] Shu Heng, Wu Shuyuan, Li Jian, Guo Xiaohong.Health Monitoring Design for Extra-Large Diameter Underwater Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 32-40
[11] Liu Guangfeng1, Chen Fangwei2, Zhou Zhi1, Zhang Shilong3, Liu Mingqiang1.Identification of Investment Risks for River-Crossing Tunnels Based on Grey Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 41-48
[12] Yao Zhanhu.Construction Risk Assessment for the Shield-Driven Section of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 49-54
[13] Zhang Boyang1, Zhao Xiaopeng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Chen Yu1.Risk Control for Saturated Hyperbaric Intervention in Slurry Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 55-61
[14] Dong Fei Zhang Dingli Fang Qian Zhu Wenjun Chen Liping Tai Qimin.Seismic Response Analysis of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels Considering the Segment Joint Effect[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 111-120
[15] Li Yufeng1,2, Peng Limin1, Lei Mingfeng1,2.Dynamics Issues Regarding High-Speed Railway Crossing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 8-15
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY