软岩大断面高铁隧道台阶法开挖稳定性及机械化施工参数优化

Stability Analysis and Optimization of Mechanized Construction Parameters for Bench Method Excavation of Large-section Soft Rock High-speed Railway Tunnels

  • 摘要: 为提高软岩大断面隧道台阶法机械化施工质量与效率,以西延高铁新延安隧道工程为依托,采用FLAC 3D建立三维数值模型,系统对比三台阶长台阶法、三台阶微台阶法、两台阶长台阶法和两台阶微台阶法下围岩变形、初期支护主应力、塑性区分布及安全系数的变化规律,并综合施工效率确定优选工法。进一步采用正交试验与AHP层次分析法,优化上台阶高度、长度及开挖进尺,研究其对拱顶沉降、边墙收敛、掌子面挤出位移及初期支护应力的影响,确定最优参数组合。研究结果表明,两台阶法整体优于三台阶法,台阶长度对围岩稳定性及初期支护应力的影响显著大于台阶数量;相较于长台阶法,微台阶法拱顶沉降、仰拱隆起和边墙收敛分别降低23.1%、13.0%和24.4%,且塑性区与潜在风险区面积更小;长台阶法掌子面挤出位移和初期支护拉应力较微台阶法分别减少2.2%和43.0%,施工效率提高15.5%;综合分析确定两台阶长台阶法为优选施工工法,其关键参数的影响顺序依次为上台阶高度、开挖进尺、上台阶长度,最优参数组合为上台阶高度取0.6H~0.7HH为隧洞高度)、开挖进尺为2~3 m、上台阶长度取50~60 m。现场实测围岩变形满足规范要求,数据与预测值吻合,验证了模型的可靠性;与人工钻爆法相比,机械化施工可降低围岩变形10%~20%,超欠挖量可控制在15~17 cm,混凝土消耗量可控制在设计量的160%~170%,施工进度提升13.3%。

     

    Abstract: To improve the construction quality and efficiency of mechanized bench excavation for large-section tunnels in soft rock, the Xi'an-Yan'an High-speed Railway Xin Yan'an Tunnel Project was taken as the engineering background. A three-dimensional numerical model was established using FLAC 3D to systematically compare the deformation of surrounding rock, principal stresses of primary support, distribution of plastic zones, and safety factors under four construction methods: the three-bench long-bench method, three-bench micro-bench method, two-bench long-bench method, and two-bench micro-bench method. The optimal construction method was determined by comprehensively considering construction efficiency. Furthermore, an orthogonal experimental design combined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was adopted to optimize the upper-bench height, upper-bench length, and excavation advance, and to investigate their effects on crown settlement, sidewall convergence, face extrusion displacement, and primary support stress, thereby determining the optimal parameter combination. The results indicate that the two-bench method performs overall better than the three-bench method, and that bench length has a significantly greater influence on surrounding rock stability and primary support stress than the number of benches. Compared with the long-bench method, the micro-bench method reduces crown settlement, invert heave, and sidewall convergence by 23.1%, 13.0%, and 24.4%, respectively, and results in smaller plastic zones and potential risk areas. In contrast, the long-bench method reduces face extrusion displacement and tensile stress in the primary support by 2.2% and 43.0%, respectively, and improves construction efficiency by 15.5%. Comprehensive analysis identifies the two-bench long-bench method as the optimal construction method. The influence of key parameters follows the order: upper-bench height, excavation advance, and upper-bench length. The optimal parameter combination is an upper-bench height of 0.6H–0.7H (where H is the tunnel height), an excavation advance of 2–3 m, and an upper-bench length of 50–60 m. Field monitoring shows that surrounding rock deformation meets code requirements, and the measured data are in good agreement with the predicted values, verifying the reliability of the model. Compared with the conventional drill-and-blast method, mechanized construction reduces surrounding rock deformation by 10%–20%, controls over-excavation and under-excavation within 15~17 cm, limits concrete consumption to 160%–170% of the design quantity, and increases construction progress by 13.3%.

     

/

返回文章
返回