Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (6) :77-85    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Seismic Resistance of Column-free Atrium Style Subway Station Based on the Integral Response Displacement Method
(Southwest Survey and Design Co., Ltd., China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Kunming 650200)
Download: PDF (5470KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract As a new station structure, the column-free atrium style subway station deletes central columns and set up openings in the middle plate to expand the effective space and increase the efficiency of transfer. To understand the response characteristics of the column-free atrium style subway station with the action of an earthquake, the integral response displacement method suitable for the underground structure with a complex face was used for quasistatic seismic analysis, and the distribution of internal force is compared among large-span column-free atrium style subway stations, general column subway stations and column-free subway stations, all of which have the same face shape. The results show that if the face shape is identical, the axial face, shearing force and bending moment of a large-span column-free atrium style subway station are higher than those of a column-free station and a general column station; the weak position of a column-free atrium style subway station is the connection between the bottom plate and the side walls, and the connection between the middle plate and the side walls is more disadvantageous than traditional subway stations.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XU Yonghao
KeywordsSubway   Integral response displacement method   Column-free atrium style subway station   Seismic analysis     
Abstract: As a new station structure, the column-free atrium style subway station deletes central columns and set up openings in the middle plate to expand the effective space and increase the efficiency of transfer. To understand the response characteristics of the column-free atrium style subway station with the action of an earthquake, the integral response displacement method suitable for the underground structure with a complex face was used for quasistatic seismic analysis, and the distribution of internal force is compared among large-span column-free atrium style subway stations, general column subway stations and column-free subway stations, all of which have the same face shape. The results show that if the face shape is identical, the axial face, shearing force and bending moment of a large-span column-free atrium style subway station are higher than those of a column-free station and a general column station; the weak position of a column-free atrium style subway station is the connection between the bottom plate and the side walls, and the connection between the middle plate and the side walls is more disadvantageous than traditional subway stations.
KeywordsSubway,   Integral response displacement method,   Column-free atrium style subway station,   Seismic analysis     
Cite this article:   
XU Yonghao .Study on Seismic Resistance of Column-free Atrium Style Subway Station Based on the Integral Response Displacement Method[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(6): 77-85
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I6/77
 
No references of article
[1] CHENG Jianhua1,2 WENG Yingkang1 YE Yaqi YANG Xiaolin1,2 YAN Wenrong3 GUO Ruijing1.Study on the Impact of High-pressure Gas Pipeline Leakage and Explosion on the Roof Structure of Underlying Subway Stations[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 151-159
[2] CHEN Yunyao.Risk Mitigation Measures and Excavation Analysis of Shield Launching beneath an Existing Metro Station on the First Terrace of the Yangtze River[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 249-258
[3] SONG Zhanping1,2,3 LI Xueli1 ZHANG Yuwei1,2,3 ZHONG Shiming1 SHI Wei4.Review and Prospect of the Mining Construction Methods for Subway Stations in China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 1-15
[4] YU Tongsheng1,2 GUAN Linxing3 YAN Zhiguo1,2.A Review of Researches on the Multi-disaster Scenarios and Structural Responses in Metro Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 16-26
[5] CHEN Weijie1 FU Zeng2 ZHU Taifeng1 YU Changyi2 SU Dong1,3 WANG Quansheng2.Numerical Simulation Study on the Load Bearing Performance of Segment-steel-concrete Composite Beams under Prestress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 162-171
[6] GUO Chengxiang1 ZHANG Yanli4 HUANG Linchong2,4 HAN Bing1 LV Wenhua1 LIANG Yu2,3,4.Mechanical Behavior Analysis of CHC Steel-concrete Composite Joints in Prefabricated Subway Stations[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 62-70
[7] LIU Zhaoyang1 JIANG Kai2 LIANG Yu2,3,4.Settlement Analysis of Existing Prefabricated Subway Stations Induced by Overburden Backfill Load Based on Kerr Foundation Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 71-78
[8] LI Lijun.Analysis of the Impact of Excavation on Ground Settlement and Adjacent Pipeline Deformation Considering Spatial Variability of Soil[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 193-199
[9] ZHANG Yu1 ZHOU Lu1 SUN Xiaohe2 LI Jun1 SHI Chenghua2 LIU Shengli.Research on Causes and Countermeasures of Water Leakage in Subway Tunnels in Coastal Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 234-424
[10] ZHAO Shulei1,2 ZHANG Ke3 DONG Chen? CHEN Zheng1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Analysis of the Composition and Concentration of Particulate Matters in Chengdu Operational Metro Running Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 221-231
[11] ZHU Yanfei1 GUO Yan1 WANG Jinyi1 MA Jianfeng2 PAN Weiqiang1.Research and Application of Full-Face Pipe Jacking Method in Saturated Soft Soil Layers for the Jing′an Temple Station Subway Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 263-271
[12] LIU Bingke1 WU Rui2 MA Jianfei2 HE Shaohui2 BAI Shouxing1 MIAO Pengbo1.Construction Risk Assessment for Reconstruction and Expansion of Long-term Operating Metro Stations Based on DBN Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 75-83
[13] SHEN Yusheng1,2 ZHAO Helin1 ZHU Zhengchao1 YI Penghao1 LEI Long3 SU Wei3.Improved Integral Response Displacement Method for Shallow-buried Tunnel Portal Section in Highly Seismic Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 78-87
[14] GUO Yalin1,2 SUN Wenhao3 XU Hongwei3 HE Wei3 CHEN Zheng1,2 GUO Chun1,2.Comparison between Shield Method and Drill and Blast Method Regarding Carbon Emission Intensity in Subway Tunnel Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 14-23
[15] WU Ze1 GU Fulin2 FU Yanbin3.Quantitative Deviation Correction Technologies for Subway Shield Tunnels in Operation through Compaction Grouting[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 185-193
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY