Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (4) :23-32    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Calculation of Damage Range of Tunnel Surrounding Rock and Analysis of Influencing Factors under Single-hole Blasting
(Key Municipal Laboratory of Chongqing Colleges for Geological Disaster Reduction in Highway and Water Transportation in Mountainous Areas, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074)
Download: PDF (2360KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to solve the inaccurate calculation problem of damage range from tunnel blasting, a calculation method of tunnel surrounding rock damage range under single-hole blasting is proposed based on the D-P criterion and fracture mechanics principle. Based on the relevant project, the damage range of tunnel surrounding rock is calculated under the action of single-hole blasting. The results show that the calculated radius of the crushing zone is 242 mm, which is within the range of measured values; the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅰ is slightly larger than that of the crushing zone, and the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅱ is 1 473 mm, slightly larger than the range of measured values.The calculated results are close to the results of the finite element simulation; The crushing zone of surrounding rock under the action of single-hole blasting is formed at 130 μs, Fissure Zone Ⅰ formed at 220 μs, and the fissure within the Fissure Zone Ⅰ expands at 220-820 μs, so as to form Fissure Zone Ⅱ at 820 μs; The attenuation rates of the vibration velocity in X and Y directions within Fissure Zone Ⅱ and the crushing zone increase with the growth of the distance to the blasting center, respectively; Under the action of single-hole blasting, the main control factors for the radii of the crushing zone and Fissure Zone Ⅰ and the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅱ are the explosive blasting velocity D and Poisson's ratio μ, respectively.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Tao WANG Linfeng LI Song ZHANG Jixu TANG Ning
KeywordsSingle-hole blasting   Surrounding rock fissure   D-P criterion   Orthogonal test     
Abstract: In order to solve the inaccurate calculation problem of damage range from tunnel blasting, a calculation method of tunnel surrounding rock damage range under single-hole blasting is proposed based on the D-P criterion and fracture mechanics principle. Based on the relevant project, the damage range of tunnel surrounding rock is calculated under the action of single-hole blasting. The results show that the calculated radius of the crushing zone is 242 mm, which is within the range of measured values; the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅰ is slightly larger than that of the crushing zone, and the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅱ is 1 473 mm, slightly larger than the range of measured values.The calculated results are close to the results of the finite element simulation; The crushing zone of surrounding rock under the action of single-hole blasting is formed at 130 μs, Fissure Zone Ⅰ formed at 220 μs, and the fissure within the Fissure Zone Ⅰ expands at 220-820 μs, so as to form Fissure Zone Ⅱ at 820 μs; The attenuation rates of the vibration velocity in X and Y directions within Fissure Zone Ⅱ and the crushing zone increase with the growth of the distance to the blasting center, respectively; Under the action of single-hole blasting, the main control factors for the radii of the crushing zone and Fissure Zone Ⅰ and the radius of Fissure Zone Ⅱ are the explosive blasting velocity D and Poisson's ratio μ, respectively.
KeywordsSingle-hole blasting,   Surrounding rock fissure,   D-P criterion,   Orthogonal test     
Cite this article:   
LI Tao WANG Linfeng LI Song ZHANG Jixu TANG Ning .Calculation of Damage Range of Tunnel Surrounding Rock and Analysis of Influencing Factors under Single-hole Blasting[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(4): 23-32
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I4/23
 
No references of article
[1] CHEN Ming1 ZHAO Dapeng2 ZHANG Jingxiang1 GAO Hui1 WANG Xing1 HAO Jianshuai3 FANG Kuizhen3.The Reuse and Performance Testing of Shield Tunnel Mucks in Synchronous Grouting Materials[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 248-258
[2] ZHENG Tengyue1 WANG Shuying1,2 YUAN Xiao1.Optimization of Construction Parameters for Shield Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Lines Based on Numerical Simulation and Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 100-107
[3] .Viscoelastic-plastic Solution for Circular Tunnels Based on the Three-stage Creep Model with the D-P Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 105-111
[4] WANG Zhenjun1 ZHANG Qingsong2 HUI Bing1 LIU Rentai2 ZHANG Xu1.Experimental Study on Diffusion Characteristics of WIS New Grouting Material in Tunnel Karst Conduit[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 202-211
[5] HUANG Xuanbo1, 2 DING Wenqi1, 2 ZHANG Qingzhao1, 2.Numerical Analysis of Bending Mechanical Properties of Flange Joint of Corrugated Steel Lining[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 96-106
[6] ZHU Xingyu LIU Zheng ZHANG Zhiqiang FENG Ying.Study on the Influence Law of Structural Design Parameters of the Railway Tunnel on Secondary Lining Cracks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 1-10
[7] MIAO Huigui1 HUANG Fei1,2 LI Shuqing1,2 LUO Yafei1,2 MIAO Dehua1 JIAO Yangyang1.Study on Detection Location of Average Gas Concentration in a Large Section Tunnel Based on Numerical Simulation - multiple Regression[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 128-135
[8] XIE Jun1,2,3 DUAN Long2 LIANG Jinxiao2 LI Yantao1 SONG Jinhui1.Analysis of the Shock Absorption of Tunnel-Soil-Surface Building Interaction System[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 136-145
[9] CHEN Zhiying NIU Guoqing WANG Shumeng GUO Chenwei.Study of the Optimization of Air Curtain Parameters in Tunnelling Based on Orthogonal Simulation Test[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 114-121
[10] ZHANG Lili1 LANG Songjun1 DENG Lin2 ZANG Cheng3.Study on the Triaxial Compression Mechanical Properties and Damage Constitutive Model of Tunnel Sandstone in Seasonal Frozen Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 95-103
[11] CHEN Fudong1 LEI Mingfeng1 ZHENG Bangyou2 WU Zhigang2 YAO Yu2.Study on Optimization of Design Parameters of One-sided Water Stopping Curtain Based on the Orthogonal Test[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 61-66
[12] ZHANG Chengjun.Optimization and Application of Smooth Blasting Parameters for Underground Powerhouse[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 136-140
[13] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[14] YANG Zhao1,3 HE Zuhao1,2 LIU Yi1,2 CHEN Peishuai1,2 LI Dejie1,3.Recycle Application of the Shield Waste Slurry in Backfill Grouting Material: A Case Study of a Slurry Shield Tunnelling in the River-crossing Fuzhou Metro[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(3): 192-199
[15] WANG Sui1 ZHONG Zuliang1, 2 LIU Xinrong1, 2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution for a Deep-buried and Pressured Circular Tunnel Considering Seepage Effect[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(1): 39-46
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY