Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2025, Vol. 62 Issue (1) :170-182    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Analysis of the Impact of the Three Pipe Jacking Over-crossing Construction on Existing Tunnel and Surface Deformation
(1. China Railway Tunnel Group No.2 Engineering Co., Ltd., Sanhe 065201; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University,Changsha 410075)
Download: PDF (8983KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Based on the new three pipe jacking utility tunnel crossing over existing metro tunnel in Nanchang City, a three-dimensional numerical model was established to study the deformation of the existing tunnel and ground surface under four construction sequences: first the middle, then both sides; first both sides, then the middle; right to left; and simultaneous construction of the three pipe jacking. The optimal construction sequence was selected by comparing the impact of these construction sequences on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The study further investigates the effect of different grouting pressures, face pressures, and anti-floating counterweights on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. Finally, field monitoring was conducted to verify the accuracy of the simulation results and reveal the displacement and deformation patterns of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The results show that: (1) The two-sides-first construction sequence is the optimal one, resulting in the least surface settlement, vertical tunnel displacement, and horizontal tunnel displacement, reducing them by 18.2%, 30.7%, and 23.8%, respectively, compared to the maximum values; (2) Increasing grouting pressure can suppress the development of surface settlement and tunnel displacement. Increasing face pressure can re? duce surface settlement but will increase tunnel displacement. The ratio of grouting pressure to vertical soil pressure should be controlled between 2.5 and 3.8, and the ratio of working face pressure to lateral soil pressure should be controlled between 1.88 and 2.5; (3) Applying anti-floating counterweights can suppress tunnel displacement, causing the floating of the tunnel vault to rise to a maximum value before decreasing. The reduction in displacement for counter weight ratios of 0.5 and 1 is 17% and 30%, respectively; (4) During the successive pipe jacking process, the surface settlement, settlement trough width, and tunnel displacement increase with each construction step. Due to the isolation effect, the displacement of the metro's downward line is smaller than that of the upward line; (5) Field monitoring showed a maximum surface settlement of 13.5 mm, with the maximum vertical displacement at the tunnel vault, the maximum vertical displacement at the track bed, and the maximum horizontal displacement at the tunnel waist being 1.5 mm, 1.1 mm, and 0.8 mm, respectively, all within safe limits.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Wang1 PENG Yanfeng1 LIU Weizheng2 ZHANG Siyu2 CHEN Changhui1
KeywordsMultiple pipe jacking   Construction parameters   Construction sequence   Tunnel deformation   Numerical simulation   Field monitoring     
Abstract: Based on the new three pipe jacking utility tunnel crossing over existing metro tunnel in Nanchang City, a three-dimensional numerical model was established to study the deformation of the existing tunnel and ground surface under four construction sequences: first the middle, then both sides; first both sides, then the middle; right to left; and simultaneous construction of the three pipe jacking. The optimal construction sequence was selected by comparing the impact of these construction sequences on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The study further investigates the effect of different grouting pressures, face pressures, and anti-floating counterweights on the deformation of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. Finally, field monitoring was conducted to verify the accuracy of the simulation results and reveal the displacement and deformation patterns of the existing tunnel and the ground surface. The results show that: (1) The two-sides-first construction sequence is the optimal one, resulting in the least surface settlement, vertical tunnel displacement, and horizontal tunnel displacement, reducing them by 18.2%, 30.7%, and 23.8%, respectively, compared to the maximum values; (2) Increasing grouting pressure can suppress the development of surface settlement and tunnel displacement. Increasing face pressure can re? duce surface settlement but will increase tunnel displacement. The ratio of grouting pressure to vertical soil pressure should be controlled between 2.5 and 3.8, and the ratio of working face pressure to lateral soil pressure should be controlled between 1.88 and 2.5; (3) Applying anti-floating counterweights can suppress tunnel displacement, causing the floating of the tunnel vault to rise to a maximum value before decreasing. The reduction in displacement for counter weight ratios of 0.5 and 1 is 17% and 30%, respectively; (4) During the successive pipe jacking process, the surface settlement, settlement trough width, and tunnel displacement increase with each construction step. Due to the isolation effect, the displacement of the metro's downward line is smaller than that of the upward line; (5) Field monitoring showed a maximum surface settlement of 13.5 mm, with the maximum vertical displacement at the tunnel vault, the maximum vertical displacement at the track bed, and the maximum horizontal displacement at the tunnel waist being 1.5 mm, 1.1 mm, and 0.8 mm, respectively, all within safe limits.
KeywordsMultiple pipe jacking,   Construction parameters,   Construction sequence,   Tunnel deformation,   Numerical simulation,   Field monitoring     
Cite this article:   
CHEN Wang1 PENG Yanfeng1 LIU Weizheng2 ZHANG Siyu2 CHEN Changhui1 .Analysis of the Impact of the Three Pipe Jacking Over-crossing Construction on Existing Tunnel and Surface Deformation[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,V62(1): 170-182
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2025/V62/I1/170
 
No references of article
[1] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[2] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[3] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[4] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[5] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
[6] JIA Yonggang1 HAO Zihan1 LU Weidong1 WU Fan1 YANG Weiwei2.Mechanical Behavior of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Segments with Different Joint Configurations[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 182-196
[7] LUO Long1 ZHU Kaicheng2 HAN Yuxuan3 CAI Dong4 LIU Zheqi5 WANG Jun6.Research on Optimization of Construction Methods for Ultra-large Cross-section Tunnels: A Case Study of the Lihuashan Tunnel on the Tianfu New Area-Qionglai Expressway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 273-282
[8] HU Yunjin1,2,3 ZHU Mingwei GAO Huicai REN Zhihao1,2,3.null[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 50-59
[9] ZHENG Tengyue1 WANG Shuying1,2 YUAN Xiao1.Optimization of Construction Parameters for Shield Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Lines Based on Numerical Simulation and Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 100-107
[10] LI Yuhua1 GAO Yawei ZHONG Qiufeng1 QIN Lixuan2 LI Junjie CHENG Zhiming2 HUANG Yonghui.Study on the Blasting Effect of Tunnel Wedge Cut under Different Cut Hole Angles[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 108-116
[11] LI Hanyuan1,2 FENG Jin1 GUO Hongyu1 XIE Xiongyao2 ZHOU Hongsheng1 SUN Fei.Study on the Combined Bearing Mechanical Characteristics of the Double-layer Lining Structure of Subsea Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 126-138
[12] SU Heng1 WANG Shimin1 ZHU Xuhong2 QIN Shanliang3.Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Shield Cutter Cutting Pile Foundation Main Reinforcement Considering Spatial Effects[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 139-150
[13] WANG Shuaishuai FU Yifan2,3 XU Yong1 SHI Jingfeng1 GUO Chun2,3.Parametric Study on Air Chamber Ventilation in Tunnelling Using Relay Fans for Airflow Distribution[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 240-248
[14] GE Zhenghui ZHENG Jianguo1 LI Xinzhi CHEN Peng3 NING Zhiwei WANG Pengcheng2.Field Measurement and Numerical Study on Deformation Behavior of Initial Supports with Different Arch Types[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 40-49
[15] LI Jing1 LUO Lusen1 ZHANG Bailin2 HU Haoran2.Study on Gas Migration and Accumulation Patterns in Tunnels after Sealing Auxiliary Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 201-211
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY