Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (2) :103-110    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Deformation Mechanism of the Underlying Tunnel Caused by Excavation of the Deep Foundation Pit in Sandy Stratum
(1 Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098;2 Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098; 3 Construction Engineering Quality Center Laboratory of Zhenjiang New District, Zhenjiang 212132)
Download: PDF (4127KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract he stress release caused by excavation of a deep foundation pit may inevitably cause additional stress and deformation of the adjacent tunnel. In this paper, a three-dimensional finite element numerical analysis is performed to study the influence of the excavation size of the deep foundation pit and the stiffness of segment joint on three-dimensional deformation of the underlying tunnel. Then, the geotechnical centrifugal model test is used to verify the rationality of the finite element calculation model and relevant results. Below the centerline of the foundation pit, the uplift and lateral bending strain of the tunnel increase along with the increase of the excavation length of the foundation pit. When the excavation length of the foundation pit is 9 times of its excavation depth, the uplift and transverse bending strain of the tunnel reach the peak value while the longitudinal bending strain of the tunnel is almost close to zero. When the excavation length of the foundation pit is more than 9 times of the excavation depth, the foundation pit-soil-tunnel interaction could be simplified as a plane strain issue. If the three-dimensional effect of the short foundation pit is not considered, the plane strain simplification of the foundation pit-soil-tunnel would seriously lead to overestimate of the tunnel uplift and lateral bending strain. Along with the increase of the joint stiffness, the tunnel uplift gradually decreases, while the transverse and longitudinal bending strains of the tunnel increase. Therefore, if a discontinuous tunnel with joints is assumed as a continuous structure, the tunnel uplift might be greatly underestimated, while the bending strain might be largely overestimated.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
FAN Yanbo1
2 CHEN Li3 SHI Jiangwei1
2 DING Chu1
2 ZHANG Xian1
2
KeywordsDeep foundation pit   Tunnel   Three-dimensional deformation   Joint stiffness   Finite element model     
Abstract: he stress release caused by excavation of a deep foundation pit may inevitably cause additional stress and deformation of the adjacent tunnel. In this paper, a three-dimensional finite element numerical analysis is performed to study the influence of the excavation size of the deep foundation pit and the stiffness of segment joint on three-dimensional deformation of the underlying tunnel. Then, the geotechnical centrifugal model test is used to verify the rationality of the finite element calculation model and relevant results. Below the centerline of the foundation pit, the uplift and lateral bending strain of the tunnel increase along with the increase of the excavation length of the foundation pit. When the excavation length of the foundation pit is 9 times of its excavation depth, the uplift and transverse bending strain of the tunnel reach the peak value while the longitudinal bending strain of the tunnel is almost close to zero. When the excavation length of the foundation pit is more than 9 times of the excavation depth, the foundation pit-soil-tunnel interaction could be simplified as a plane strain issue. If the three-dimensional effect of the short foundation pit is not considered, the plane strain simplification of the foundation pit-soil-tunnel would seriously lead to overestimate of the tunnel uplift and lateral bending strain. Along with the increase of the joint stiffness, the tunnel uplift gradually decreases, while the transverse and longitudinal bending strains of the tunnel increase. Therefore, if a discontinuous tunnel with joints is assumed as a continuous structure, the tunnel uplift might be greatly underestimated, while the bending strain might be largely overestimated.
KeywordsDeep foundation pit,   Tunnel,   Three-dimensional deformation,   Joint stiffness,   Finite element model     
Cite this article:   
FAN Yanbo1, 2 CHEN Li3 SHI Jiangwei1, 2 DING Chu1 etc .Study on Deformation Mechanism of the Underlying Tunnel Caused by Excavation of the Deep Foundation Pit in Sandy Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(2): 103-110
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2021/V58/I2/103
 
No references of article
[1] YU Jie.Study on Reasonable Construction Method for Tunnels in Contact Zone of Red Clay and Sandstone Interbedded with Mudstone[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 174-181
[2] WU Jiancheng.Research on Towing Issues of Immersed Tunnel Elements on Long-distance and Complex Route[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 145-150
[3] LEI Shengxiang1 WANG Fei2 YU Jie2 SHAO Shengjun3 LIANG Qingguo4.Discussion on the Technological Development of Loess Tunnelling in the Future[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 1-7
[4] ZHANG Junfeng1 LI Qiang2 SHI Yongyue2 WU Lei2.On Development Law of Karst Water and Prediction of Water Inflow in a Tunnel in Southwest China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 14-21
[5] Zhou Wenjun.Study on Water Inflow Prediction Technology for Guanshan Tunnel on Tianshui-Pingliang Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 22-30
[6] GONG Qiuming1 WANG Qinghuan1 WANG Dujuan2 QIU Haifeng3 WU Fan.Development of a Real-time Monitoring System of Cutterhead Conditions in Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 41-50
[7] XU Xueliang1,2 MA Weibin1,2 CAI Degou1,2 AN Zheli1,2 CHAI Jinfei1,2.Research on Full-Life-Cycle Inspection and Monitoring System of Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 31-40
[8] HUANG Jifu XIAO Gongyi.Study on Practical Application and Adaptability of the Roadheader in Transportation Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 51-62
[9] WANG Chunhe1,2 ZHU Fuqiang3 LUO Xing4 ZHANG Chuankui1,2 TIAN Junling3 LI Hepeng2 GUO Yifei4.Study on Construction Risk Assessment of Tunnel Reconstruction and Expansion Works[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 63-70
[10] ZHANG Ziguang1 CAO Guangyong1,2 LI Jianli3 ZHAI Chaojiao1,2.Research on Safe Thickness of Overlying Rock Layer above Subway Tunnels in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 71-77
[11] WEN Xu1 PEI Xiangjun1 PEI Zuan1 YANG Hailong1 CHEN Zhenlin1 ZHANG Yichen2.Study on Structural Design and Safety of Shed Tunnels in the Scenic Area of Changbai Mountains[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 151-157
[12] WU Bo1,2 PENG Yiyong1,2 MENG Guowang1,2 PU Songquan3.Analysis on Ground Surface Heaving ahead of Cutting Face Caused by Largesection Rectangular Pipe Jacking in Soft Soil Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 86-92
[13] HU Changming1,2 LI Liang1 MEI Yuan1,2 YUAN Yili1 WANG Zhiyu1.Global Sensitivity Analysis on Parameters of the Prediction Model for Shield Vertical Attitude[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 127-134
[14] GAO Xin WANG Wenjuan.Research on Reasonable Combination Forms and Mechanical Deformation Characteristics of Double-layer Superimposed Lining in Deep-buried Tunnels under the Action of Far-field Hydrostatic Pressure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 93-102
[15] YU Hongping1 SU Peidong2 ZHAO Tianbiao3 CHEN Dejun1 XU Xueyuan1 DU Yuben1.Study on Sources and Hazards of Crude Oil and Harmful Gases in Huangjialiang Tunnel on Xi′an-Chengdu Passenger Dedicated Line[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 182-187
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY