Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (3) :182-189    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Experimental Study on the Soil Conditioning in EPB Shield Tunnelling in the Shijiazhuang Sandy Soil Stratum
(1 Key Laboratory of Urban Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124; 2 China Railway No.17 Bureau Group Sixth Engineering Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350014)
Download: PDF (3366KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Sandy soil is a typical mechanical unstable stratum with poor flow behaviors. When an earth pressure balance shield drives in the sandy soil stratum, it is prone to abnormal wear of the cutterhead and cutters, increase of torque and thrust of the cutterhead, failure and collapse of the working face, blow-out and other problems. In regards to this, taking a certain running tunnel section of Phase 2, Shijiazhuang Metro Line 1 as an example, where the earth pressure balance shield driving in the sandy soil stratum, it first conducts lab tests on soil conditioner, slump and mixing, and then applies the test results to the construction site, finally analyzes the construction parameters after soil conditioning. The results show that the performance of the soil conditioner is better when the foam concentration is 6% and the slurry concentration is 16%, meeting the requirements of shield construction; the best soil conditioning option is the slurry injection ratio of 8% and foam injection ratio of 60%, with the slump in the range of 100- 200 mm, as well as small stirring torque and low fluctuation; within a certain range, with the increase of the foam injection ratio, the indices of torque penetration, screw conveyor torque and soil pressure fluctuation in the soil chamber during tunnelling will be reduced, which is conducive to shield construction, but the foam injection should not be excessive.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Leilei1 YIN Lijun1 GONG Qiuming1 LI Rui2 WU Fan1 BAN Chao1
KeywordsMetro tunnel   Earth pressure balance shield   Soil conditioning   Sandy soil stratum   Laboratory test     
Abstract: Sandy soil is a typical mechanical unstable stratum with poor flow behaviors. When an earth pressure balance shield drives in the sandy soil stratum, it is prone to abnormal wear of the cutterhead and cutters, increase of torque and thrust of the cutterhead, failure and collapse of the working face, blow-out and other problems. In regards to this, taking a certain running tunnel section of Phase 2, Shijiazhuang Metro Line 1 as an example, where the earth pressure balance shield driving in the sandy soil stratum, it first conducts lab tests on soil conditioner, slump and mixing, and then applies the test results to the construction site, finally analyzes the construction parameters after soil conditioning. The results show that the performance of the soil conditioner is better when the foam concentration is 6% and the slurry concentration is 16%, meeting the requirements of shield construction; the best soil conditioning option is the slurry injection ratio of 8% and foam injection ratio of 60%, with the slump in the range of 100- 200 mm, as well as small stirring torque and low fluctuation; within a certain range, with the increase of the foam injection ratio, the indices of torque penetration, screw conveyor torque and soil pressure fluctuation in the soil chamber during tunnelling will be reduced, which is conducive to shield construction, but the foam injection should not be excessive.
KeywordsMetro tunnel,   Earth pressure balance shield,   Soil conditioning,   Sandy soil stratum,   Laboratory test     
Cite this article:   
WANG Leilei1 YIN Lijun1 GONG Qiuming1 LI Rui2 WU Fan1 BAN Chao1 .Experimental Study on the Soil Conditioning in EPB Shield Tunnelling in the Shijiazhuang Sandy Soil Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(3): 182-189
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2021/V58/I3/182
 
No references of article
[1] .[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 1-5
[2] ZHU Weibin1,2 ZHONG Changping3 MI Jinsheng1 HUANG Weiran4.Challenges and Prospects of Construction Technology for Extra-large Diameter Composite Shields[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 6-16
[3] MA Shiqiang.Dialectical Thinking on Solving Major Issues in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 17-22
[4] ZHANG Jie1 LI Wei1 LI Limin2 WAN Jiwei3 DING Weihua4 JIA Chao1.Influence of Tectonic Characteristics of Surrounding Rocks on Engineering Geology of Water Conveyance Tunnel in the Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Valley Water Diversion Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 23-32
[5] HAN Xingbo1,2 ZHAO Weifeng1.Study on the Tunnel Lining Cracking Patterns and Failure Ranges under Fire Scenarios[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 33-42
[6] GAO Lei BAO Xueying LI Aichun.DSR-Cloud Model Based Evaluation of Construction Safety of Tunnels with High Geotemperature[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 43-51
[7] DENG Haiming1 YANG Xi2 LI Zhishan3 LEI Hongxian4 TANG Kan1 FAN Mingwai2 ZHANG Hantao2.A 3D GPR Imaging Technique of Tunnel Cavities Based on the Half-space Scanning Measurement Mode[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 52-59
[8] HE Lili.Implementation and Application of Tension-Shear Fracture of Anchor Bolts in FLAC3D[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 60-69
[9] ZHANG Xiaojian1 LIANG Bo1,2 ZHONG Shengming1,3.Study on the Influence of Environmental Factors on the Brightness Value L20(S) outside Highway Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 70-78
[10] ZHANG Chang′an1 QI Xiangcheng2.Solutions to the Spherical Cavity Grouting Pressure in Circular Tunnels Based on the Generalized SMP Strength Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 79-83
[11] YAO Yuxiang1 LI Sheng1 MA Li1 WANG Changdan2 ZUO Di3.DEM Analysis on Soil Arching Effect of Unloading Structure of High-Filled Open Cut Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 84-93
[12] HAN Guoqiang1 ZHOU Peng1 LI Sheng1 HE Chuan2 MA Li1.Research on the Calculation Method of Vertical Soil Pressure on High-Filled Open Cut Tunnels Based on Multi-factor Coupling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 94-99
[13] GAN Xingqiu1 XU Feng1 WANG Xiaowei1 LI Pei1 PENG Shuquan2 QI Binxi2 FAN Ling2 WANG Fan2.Simulation Study on Seismic Response Laws and Seismic Mitigation Measures of Tunnels under Fault Dislocation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 100-106
[14] YUAN Bin1 XU Fanxian2 LIAO Huan3 ZHONG Yutian3 LUO Gang3.Study on the Influence of the Spatial Combination Relationship of Structural Planes on the Stability of Tunnel Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 107-114
[15] AN Yonglin1 LI Jiahao1 OUYANG Pengbo2 LIU Wenjuan1 SU Guangming3 ZHOU Jian3.Theoretical Analysis of the Stability of Tunnel Face under Pipe Roof Presupport[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 115-122
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY