Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (2) :172-181    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata
(1. China Railway Construction South China Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458; 2. China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd.,Tianjin 300222)
Download: PDF (5671KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The shield tunnelling of Guangzhou Metro Line 18 is faced to such characteristics as complex ground dis? tribution, large strength differences between soft and hard rocks, and dense residential building complex located above the tunnel. In view of this, it is intended to address two major problems in actual construction, i.e. settling the reasonable tunnelling parameters and controlling the settlement deformation of buildings on the ground surface through a series of active measures, such as grouting reinforcement, on-site dynamic monitoring, and optimization of tunnelling parameters. The results show that: (1) in this type of soft and hard rock interbedded strata, tunnelling parameters (such as torque and thrust) would fluctuate greatly when the cutterhead passes through the geological boundary of different strata, and the total thrust would be in a fine correlation with the torque, where it is appropriate to control the tunnelling parameters at certain values, i.e. the thrust at 30 000~35 000 kN, the torque at 4 500~6 000kN·m, and the advancing speed at 35~45 mm/min; (2) the proposed technological process of multi-section sealing and advanced grouting in the tunnel can lift the ground surface by 3~5 mm within the scope of 18 m in front of the cutterhead, with maximum lifting value of 9.02 mm, while it can also mitigate the settlement tendency of the soil mass induced by shield driving and subsequent consolidation and stabilization; (3) temporary shield stoppage caused by tool wear, large fluctuation in tunnelling parameters, and the jamming of the screw conveyor can cause the daily settlement rate of the buildings on the surface to exceed 3 mm/d. The adoption of advanced grouting in tunnel and the clay shock method ahead of the preset machine stop point can effectively alleviate the settlement tendency and control the daily settlement rate below 2 mm/d during the hyperbaric intervention of the earth chamber; (4) the settlement of the surface buildings near the left and right tunnel axes can be basically divided into three phases of slight heave—large settlement—gradual stabilization, with maximum settlement of -21.38 mm and -22.49 mm respectivly, being less than the control values.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Bangchao1 LIU Hongliang2 LEI Fengguo2 PENG Guanghuo2
KeywordsUpper-soft and lower-hard strata   Earth pressure balance shield   Dense building complex   Tunnelling parameter   Advanced grouting in tunnel   Settlement control     
Abstract: The shield tunnelling of Guangzhou Metro Line 18 is faced to such characteristics as complex ground dis? tribution, large strength differences between soft and hard rocks, and dense residential building complex located above the tunnel. In view of this, it is intended to address two major problems in actual construction, i.e. settling the reasonable tunnelling parameters and controlling the settlement deformation of buildings on the ground surface through a series of active measures, such as grouting reinforcement, on-site dynamic monitoring, and optimization of tunnelling parameters. The results show that: (1) in this type of soft and hard rock interbedded strata, tunnelling parameters (such as torque and thrust) would fluctuate greatly when the cutterhead passes through the geological boundary of different strata, and the total thrust would be in a fine correlation with the torque, where it is appropriate to control the tunnelling parameters at certain values, i.e. the thrust at 30 000~35 000 kN, the torque at 4 500~6 000kN·m, and the advancing speed at 35~45 mm/min; (2) the proposed technological process of multi-section sealing and advanced grouting in the tunnel can lift the ground surface by 3~5 mm within the scope of 18 m in front of the cutterhead, with maximum lifting value of 9.02 mm, while it can also mitigate the settlement tendency of the soil mass induced by shield driving and subsequent consolidation and stabilization; (3) temporary shield stoppage caused by tool wear, large fluctuation in tunnelling parameters, and the jamming of the screw conveyor can cause the daily settlement rate of the buildings on the surface to exceed 3 mm/d. The adoption of advanced grouting in tunnel and the clay shock method ahead of the preset machine stop point can effectively alleviate the settlement tendency and control the daily settlement rate below 2 mm/d during the hyperbaric intervention of the earth chamber; (4) the settlement of the surface buildings near the left and right tunnel axes can be basically divided into three phases of slight heave—large settlement—gradual stabilization, with maximum settlement of -21.38 mm and -22.49 mm respectivly, being less than the control values.
KeywordsUpper-soft and lower-hard strata,   Earth pressure balance shield,   Dense building complex,   Tunnelling parameter,   Advanced grouting in tunnel,   Settlement control     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Bangchao1 LIU Hongliang2 LEI Fengguo2 PENG Guanghuo2 .On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(2): 172-181
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I2/172
 
No references of article
[1] XU Gongyun1 XU Wanghao1,2 YAO Zhigang1 FANG Yong1 LIU Sijin3.Analysis on Influence of Penetration Angle on Disc Cutter Impact Based on Three-dimensional RBD-DEM Coupling Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 77-84
[2] WANG Yingxue1 LUO Yang1 ZHANG Ziwei1 WANG Guoyi2 SONG Xiangshuai1.Analysis of Influence of Arc Cutterhead on Ground Settlement during EPB Shield Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 155-162
[3] SONG Yang1 WANG Weiyi2 DU Chunsheng3.On Parameter Optimization for a Slurry Shield Approaching Construction under Existing Subway Tunnels in Water-Rich Pebble and Mudstone Composite Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 85-95
[4] CHEN Yan1 WANG Yuhao1 FANG Yong1 XU Gongyun1 ZHOU Kaige1 LIU Sijin2.Laboratory Experimental Study on the Wear of EPB Shield Cutting Tools in Sandy Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 159-166
[5] WANG Leilei1 YIN Lijun1 GONG Qiuming1 LI Rui2 WU Fan1 BAN Chao1.Experimental Study on the Soil Conditioning in EPB Shield Tunnelling in the Shijiazhuang Sandy Soil Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 182-189
[6] ZHANG Xun1 HE Xiongfei2,3.Study on the Effect of Foam Agent on the Main Tunnelling Parameters of Earth Pressure Balanced Shields[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 176-181
[7] ZHANG Ziguang1 CAO Guangyong1,2 LI Jianli3 ZHAI Chaojiao1,2.Research on Safe Thickness of Overlying Rock Layer above Subway Tunnels in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(2): 71-77
[8] YANG Jihua1 GUO Weixin1 YAN Changbin2 MIAO Dong1.Study on Optimization of TBM Driving Parameters Based on the Energy Consumption[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 54-60
[9] WANG Junxiang1 XU Chenhui1 DONG Jianhua2 CHEN Sili1 KOU Haijun3 WANG Xin1.Soil Parameters Inversion and Working Face Stability Analysis for a Shielddriven Utility Tunnel in Water-rich Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 117-126
[10] LIU Hui1 LI Yanqing2.Study on the Construction Technology for EPB Shield Crossing under Dense Buildings in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Stratum with Shallow-buried Depth[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(6): 186-192
[11] GONG Chenjie1 YANG Junsheng1 FU Jinyang1, 2.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Segment Cracking of LargeDiameter River-Crossing Shield Tunnelling in Composite Rock Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[12] ZHANG Xin.Research on Application of Random Source Model Based New Microtremor Survey Technology to Shield Tunnelling in Upper Soft and Lower Hard Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 43-50
[13] LI Gang1 LI Xiaojun1 YANG Wenxiang2 HAN Dong1.Research on Prediction of TBM Driving Parameters Based on Deep Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 154-159
[14] SHEN Xiang1 YUAN Dajun2 WU Jun3 FU Yanbin1.Analysis and Prediction of Driving Parameters of Shield Tunnelling in Complex Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 160-166
[15] YAO Xiaoming1 SHU Bo2 LI Bo.Safety Control Technology for the Newly Constructed Shield Tunnels Approaching Existing Metro Lines Underneath[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 243-
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY