Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (2) :172-181    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata
(1. China Railway Construction South China Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511458; 2. China Railway 18th Bureau Group Co., Ltd.,Tianjin 300222)
Download: PDF (5671KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The shield tunnelling of Guangzhou Metro Line 18 is faced to such characteristics as complex ground dis? tribution, large strength differences between soft and hard rocks, and dense residential building complex located above the tunnel. In view of this, it is intended to address two major problems in actual construction, i.e. settling the reasonable tunnelling parameters and controlling the settlement deformation of buildings on the ground surface through a series of active measures, such as grouting reinforcement, on-site dynamic monitoring, and optimization of tunnelling parameters. The results show that: (1) in this type of soft and hard rock interbedded strata, tunnelling parameters (such as torque and thrust) would fluctuate greatly when the cutterhead passes through the geological boundary of different strata, and the total thrust would be in a fine correlation with the torque, where it is appropriate to control the tunnelling parameters at certain values, i.e. the thrust at 30 000~35 000 kN, the torque at 4 500~6 000kN·m, and the advancing speed at 35~45 mm/min; (2) the proposed technological process of multi-section sealing and advanced grouting in the tunnel can lift the ground surface by 3~5 mm within the scope of 18 m in front of the cutterhead, with maximum lifting value of 9.02 mm, while it can also mitigate the settlement tendency of the soil mass induced by shield driving and subsequent consolidation and stabilization; (3) temporary shield stoppage caused by tool wear, large fluctuation in tunnelling parameters, and the jamming of the screw conveyor can cause the daily settlement rate of the buildings on the surface to exceed 3 mm/d. The adoption of advanced grouting in tunnel and the clay shock method ahead of the preset machine stop point can effectively alleviate the settlement tendency and control the daily settlement rate below 2 mm/d during the hyperbaric intervention of the earth chamber; (4) the settlement of the surface buildings near the left and right tunnel axes can be basically divided into three phases of slight heave—large settlement—gradual stabilization, with maximum settlement of -21.38 mm and -22.49 mm respectivly, being less than the control values.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Bangchao1 LIU Hongliang2 LEI Fengguo2 PENG Guanghuo2
KeywordsUpper-soft and lower-hard strata   Earth pressure balance shield   Dense building complex   Tunnelling parameter   Advanced grouting in tunnel   Settlement control     
Abstract: The shield tunnelling of Guangzhou Metro Line 18 is faced to such characteristics as complex ground dis? tribution, large strength differences between soft and hard rocks, and dense residential building complex located above the tunnel. In view of this, it is intended to address two major problems in actual construction, i.e. settling the reasonable tunnelling parameters and controlling the settlement deformation of buildings on the ground surface through a series of active measures, such as grouting reinforcement, on-site dynamic monitoring, and optimization of tunnelling parameters. The results show that: (1) in this type of soft and hard rock interbedded strata, tunnelling parameters (such as torque and thrust) would fluctuate greatly when the cutterhead passes through the geological boundary of different strata, and the total thrust would be in a fine correlation with the torque, where it is appropriate to control the tunnelling parameters at certain values, i.e. the thrust at 30 000~35 000 kN, the torque at 4 500~6 000kN·m, and the advancing speed at 35~45 mm/min; (2) the proposed technological process of multi-section sealing and advanced grouting in the tunnel can lift the ground surface by 3~5 mm within the scope of 18 m in front of the cutterhead, with maximum lifting value of 9.02 mm, while it can also mitigate the settlement tendency of the soil mass induced by shield driving and subsequent consolidation and stabilization; (3) temporary shield stoppage caused by tool wear, large fluctuation in tunnelling parameters, and the jamming of the screw conveyor can cause the daily settlement rate of the buildings on the surface to exceed 3 mm/d. The adoption of advanced grouting in tunnel and the clay shock method ahead of the preset machine stop point can effectively alleviate the settlement tendency and control the daily settlement rate below 2 mm/d during the hyperbaric intervention of the earth chamber; (4) the settlement of the surface buildings near the left and right tunnel axes can be basically divided into three phases of slight heave—large settlement—gradual stabilization, with maximum settlement of -21.38 mm and -22.49 mm respectivly, being less than the control values.
KeywordsUpper-soft and lower-hard strata,   Earth pressure balance shield,   Dense building complex,   Tunnelling parameter,   Advanced grouting in tunnel,   Settlement control     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Bangchao1 LIU Hongliang2 LEI Fengguo2 PENG Guanghuo2 .On Settlement Control in Large-diameter EPB Shield Tunnelling under Civil Housing Complex in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(2): 172-181
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2022/V59/I2/172
 
No references of article
[1] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[2] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[3] SU Heng1 WANG Shimin1 ZHU Xuhong2 QIN Shanliang3.Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Shield Cutter Cutting Pile Foundation Main Reinforcement Considering Spatial Effects[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 139-150
[4] CHEN Yunyao.Risk Mitigation Measures and Excavation Analysis of Shield Launching beneath an Existing Metro Station on the First Terrace of the Yangtze River[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 249-258
[5] LIU Xiaodi WANG Huaidong2 JIANG Tao1 WANG Zhiguo3.Indoor Experimental Study on Rheological Properties of Conditioned Soils in Gravel Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 282-290
[6] ZHANG Guang1 GONG Qiuming1 XIE Xingfei1 PEI Chengyuan2 SHANG Ceng2.Interval Prediction of TBM Parameters in Stable Excavation Sections Based on Bootstrap-COA-BiGRU Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 121-131
[7] ZHANG Huan1, 2 ZHANG Shishu3 LI Tianbin1, 2 YANG Gang1, 2 LI Shisen1, 2 XIAO Huabo3 CHEN Weidong3.GAPSO-LightGBM-based Intelligent Prediction Method of Surrounding Rock Grade in TBM Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 98-109
[8] LI Jianbin.Advances and Prospects of Tunnel Boring Machine Technology in China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 178-189
[9] XIONG Yingjian1 LIU Sijin2 MA Yuyang2 FANG Yong1 HE Chuan1.Optimization Method for Shield Tunnelling Parameters Based on PSO Algorithm and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 165-174
[10] XIE Miao WANG Haonan LI Siyao TIAN Bo LIU Yafeng ZHANG Hongyu.Study on TBM Tunnelling Parameters Under Ultra-small-radius Turning Conditions Based on Field Data[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 58-66
[11] LI Zifeng1 DUAN Baoliang2.Study on Tunnel Face Collapse and Corresponding Treatment Measures in Shield Tunnelling in Silty-fine Sand Layer[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 237-245
[12] LIU Tingyu1,2 WANG Shuying1,2,3 ZHONG Jiazheng1,2.A Review of Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Slump of Conditioned Spoils of Earth Pressure Balance Shields[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 1-13
[13] HUANG Fengyuan1 ZHANG Kangjian2 CHEN Dengkai1 ZHANG Zhiqiang2 JIA Bin1.Experimental Study on the Muck Improvement of Earth Pressure Balance Shield Tunnelling in Water-bearing Composite Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 262-269
[14] ZHANG Qinglong1,2 ZHU Yanwen1 MA Rui2 YAN Dong3 YANG Chuangen3 CUI Tonghuan3 LI Qingbin2.Study on Prediction of TBM Tunnelling Parameters Based on Attentionenhanced Bi-LSTM Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 69-80
[15] LIU Zhaowei.Research on the Technology for the Shield Tunnel Crossing the Railway Marshalling Station in the Pebble-boulder Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 226-233
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY