Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (2) :54-61    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
A Study on Neural Network Evaluation Model of Blasting Effect in Mountain Tunnel and Decision-making Method for Blasting Parameter Optimization
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075; 2. Guizhou Road & Bridge Group Co., Ltd.,Guiyang 550000; 3. Hunan Railway Academy Civil Engineering Testing Co., Ltd., Changsha 410075; 4. Hefei Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Hefei 230031; 5. Guizhou Guijin Expressway Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081)
Download: PDF (4199KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In view of the various problems faced by the blasting of mountain tunnels, such as overbreak and under? break and unsuitable muck block size, this paper analyzes the main influencing factors of these problems, and establishes the evaluation index system of tunnel blasting effect. Furthermore, the study establishes a neural network evaluation model for tunnel blasting effects with blasting block size and over- and under-break amount as the prediction target, puts forward an instance segmentation algorithm for the size of tunnel blasting muck blocks based on deep learning, and forms a decision-making method of blasting parameter optimization for mountain tunnels, which is applied to and verified by engineering application. The results show that (1) The size of muck blocks detected by the instance segmentation algorithm of tunnel blasting muck blocks based on deep learning has an error of less than 6.9% (confidence level is 95%) from the true value, realizing the rapid acquisition of the sample data for tunnel muck blocks; (2) The neural network evaluation model of tunnel blasting effect is trained by 148 sets of engineering sample data, after which it can better predict the size of blasting muck blocks and amount of overbreak; (3) The average linear overbreak in the test section after the optimization of the blasting parameters is about 10%, showing an over 50% reduction from the original plan, and the measured size of the muck blocks and amount of overbreak are in good agreement with the model predictions, with a deviation less than 20%.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LEI Mingfeng1 ZHANG Yunbo1 QIN Guifang2 SHI Yuanbo1 GONG Chenjie1
3
KeywordsMountain tunnel   Blasting excavation   Over- and under-break   Neural network   Deep learning   Image identification     
Abstract: In view of the various problems faced by the blasting of mountain tunnels, such as overbreak and under? break and unsuitable muck block size, this paper analyzes the main influencing factors of these problems, and establishes the evaluation index system of tunnel blasting effect. Furthermore, the study establishes a neural network evaluation model for tunnel blasting effects with blasting block size and over- and under-break amount as the prediction target, puts forward an instance segmentation algorithm for the size of tunnel blasting muck blocks based on deep learning, and forms a decision-making method of blasting parameter optimization for mountain tunnels, which is applied to and verified by engineering application. The results show that (1) The size of muck blocks detected by the instance segmentation algorithm of tunnel blasting muck blocks based on deep learning has an error of less than 6.9% (confidence level is 95%) from the true value, realizing the rapid acquisition of the sample data for tunnel muck blocks; (2) The neural network evaluation model of tunnel blasting effect is trained by 148 sets of engineering sample data, after which it can better predict the size of blasting muck blocks and amount of overbreak; (3) The average linear overbreak in the test section after the optimization of the blasting parameters is about 10%, showing an over 50% reduction from the original plan, and the measured size of the muck blocks and amount of overbreak are in good agreement with the model predictions, with a deviation less than 20%.
KeywordsMountain tunnel,   Blasting excavation,   Over- and under-break,   Neural network,   Deep learning,   Image identification     
Cite this article:   
LEI Mingfeng1 ZHANG Yunbo1 QIN Guifang2 SHI Yuanbo1 GONG Chenjie1, 3 .A Study on Neural Network Evaluation Model of Blasting Effect in Mountain Tunnel and Decision-making Method for Blasting Parameter Optimization[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(2): 54-61
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I2/54
 
No references of article
[1] BAI Rongmin1 MA Yuyang2 LIU Sijin2 FANG Yong1 HE Chuan1.Prediction and Analysis of Tail Seal Grease Consumption of Slurry Shield Machine Based on IPSO-ANN Time Series Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 44-54
[2] YAN Pengfei CAI Yongchang ZHOU Long.Nonlinear Model for Segment Joint Stiffness Based on Deep Neural Network and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 24-33
[3] LIU Yuyang1 XI Longlong1 LAI Hongpeng2 ZHAO Yongbin3 SUN Weixing3 JIA Neng1.Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Variation Law of Crystalline Materials and Water Environment and Crystallization Path of the Tunnel Drainage System in Calcium-bearing Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 217-226
[4] ZHANG Kexue1,2,3,4,5,6 WU Yongwei1,3,6 HE Manchao2 CHEN Xuexi1,3,6 JIANG Yaodong4 LI Dong1,3,6.Research on the Intelligent Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal Seam Impact Risk Based on the BP Neural Network Optimized by the Bat Algorithm[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 38-46
[5] REN Yang1,2 LI Tianbin1,2 ZHANG Jiaxin3 WANG Gangwei1,2.An Intelligent Inversion Study of In-situ Stress Field in Deep Buried Super-long Tunnels under Complex Geological Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 47-53
[6] LUO Hu1 Miller Mark1 ZHANG Rui2 FANG Yong1.Research on the Automatic Identification Method for Rock Mass Fracture in Tunnel Face Based on Computer Vision Technology and Deep Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(1): 56-65
[7] CHEN Yingying1,2 LIU Xingen1,2 HUANG Yongliang3,4 LI Mingdong1.Crack Identification of Tunnel Lining Based on Neural Network and Edge Correction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(6): 24-34
[8] HOU Kunzhou.Study on TBM Deviation Correction and Direction Control Based on the Deep Transfer Learning (DTL)[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 81-89
[9] LIU Wenjian1 ZHANG Guocai2 LV Jianbing3 LIU Feng3 WU Weijun3 CHEN Gongfa3.Research on the Recognition Technology and APP for Sematic Segmentation of the Images of Drainage Hole Siltation by Crystals[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(4): 100-107
[10] YU Lingfeng.Research on the Characteristics of Structural Dynamic Response and the Seismic Mechanism of Mountain Tunnels with Different Depths[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 227-235
[11] FENG Huijun.Construction and Safety Control of New Metro Tunnels Passing under Existing Operational Metro Lines in Close Proximity[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 220-226
[12] ZHANG Chun ZHOU Yuxuan LI Dengpeng.Intelligent Reconstruction of the Digital Model of Metro Shield Tunnels with Disordered Erected Segment Ring Structure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(1): 80-86
[13] HUANG Diwen HUO Hongbin CHEN Dong.Analysis on Shear Deformation in a Circular Tunnel Based on Optimized Neural Network[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(6): 102-110
[14] CHEN Yukun1 GUAN Huisheng1 ZHOU Lei2 LIU Cheng1.Research on the Wear Prediction of Disc Cutters Based on BP Neural Network[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 78-84
[15] QIN Shangyou1 CHEN Jiayao2 ZHANG Dongming2 YANG Tongjun1 HUANG Hongwei2 ZHAO Shuai2.Automatic Identification of Rock Structure at Tunnel Working Face Based on Deep Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 29-36
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY