Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (3) :146-155    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Dynamic Response in Cut Blasting in Closely-spaced Overlapping Tunnels
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 2. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 3. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University, Tianjin 300192; 4. Highway Tunnel Branch of Sichuan Road & Bridge (Group) Corporation Ltd., Chengdu 610200)
Download: PDF (4495KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In the study on blasting excavation of the Donghuashan Tunnel in Bazhong, Sichuan, the velocity field and stress field distribution characteristics of lining structure of existing tunnel have been analyzed by using the dynamic finite element software LS-DYNA, the decoupled charging method and the fluid-structure interaction calculation method, and the correctness of the calculation result has been verified by using the monitoring data. On this basis and in view of how the angle of cut hole will affect the dynamic response in blasting excavation of tunnel, 6 sets of cases have been established in the range of 15°~75°, to investigate the law of dynamic response of existing tunnel lining. As the results suggest, the vertical vibration velocity of existing tunnel lining is the greatest of all vibration velocities, and the vertical peak vibration velocity is used to represent the maximum structural vibration characteristic; the maximum vertical vibration velocity of existing tunnel occurs behind the blasting face, and the maximum vertical vibration velocity of the least favorable cross-section appears at the arch bottom; the maximum principal stress peak is mainly present at the arch bottom and the left and right arch feet, and the maximum tensile stress appears at the left arch foot; greater included angle between cut hole and tunnel face means greater vibration velocity and greater maximum principal stress peak generated by the blasting, and there is a clear linear relation between the two parameters. The monitoring points should preferably be set at the arch bottom and foot of the lining behind the blasting face, and the vibration response can be abated by decreasing the angle of cut hole. Based on the stratum conditions and spatial characteristics of the tunnel of interest, the vibration velocity safety threshold of existing tunnel lining is 18.17 cm/s.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YUAN Ran1 LI Junhui1 CHU Zeyuan2 ZHANG Rui3 LUO Chunyu4
KeywordsOverlapping tunnels   Cut blasting   Peak vibration velocity   Stress distribution   Cut hole angle   Dynamic response   Vibration velocity safety threshold     
Abstract: In the study on blasting excavation of the Donghuashan Tunnel in Bazhong, Sichuan, the velocity field and stress field distribution characteristics of lining structure of existing tunnel have been analyzed by using the dynamic finite element software LS-DYNA, the decoupled charging method and the fluid-structure interaction calculation method, and the correctness of the calculation result has been verified by using the monitoring data. On this basis and in view of how the angle of cut hole will affect the dynamic response in blasting excavation of tunnel, 6 sets of cases have been established in the range of 15°~75°, to investigate the law of dynamic response of existing tunnel lining. As the results suggest, the vertical vibration velocity of existing tunnel lining is the greatest of all vibration velocities, and the vertical peak vibration velocity is used to represent the maximum structural vibration characteristic; the maximum vertical vibration velocity of existing tunnel occurs behind the blasting face, and the maximum vertical vibration velocity of the least favorable cross-section appears at the arch bottom; the maximum principal stress peak is mainly present at the arch bottom and the left and right arch feet, and the maximum tensile stress appears at the left arch foot; greater included angle between cut hole and tunnel face means greater vibration velocity and greater maximum principal stress peak generated by the blasting, and there is a clear linear relation between the two parameters. The monitoring points should preferably be set at the arch bottom and foot of the lining behind the blasting face, and the vibration response can be abated by decreasing the angle of cut hole. Based on the stratum conditions and spatial characteristics of the tunnel of interest, the vibration velocity safety threshold of existing tunnel lining is 18.17 cm/s.
KeywordsOverlapping tunnels,   Cut blasting,   Peak vibration velocity,   Stress distribution,   Cut hole angle,   Dynamic response,   Vibration velocity safety threshold     
Cite this article:   
YUAN Ran1 LI Junhui1 CHU Zeyuan2 ZHANG Rui3 LUO Chunyu4 .Study on Dynamic Response in Cut Blasting in Closely-spaced Overlapping Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(3): 146-155
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I3/146
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Jiaming1 ZHANG Junru1 WANG Zhiyong1 JING Yawen1 JIANG Manlin1 TAN Yumei1 CHEN Kegang2.Impact Zoning and Dynamic Response to Blasting Vibration in Adjacent Tunnel under Hard Rock Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 125-137
[2] MENG Xiancong1 ZHANG Xiedong1 WU Lin2 ZHU Haojie1 LI Zhifeng1.Analysis of the Dynamic Response of Twin-tunnel Rail Sleepers and Lining under the Action of Trains[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 99-106
[3] YU Lingfeng.Research on the Characteristics of Structural Dynamic Response and the Seismic Mechanism of Mountain Tunnels with Different Depths[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(3): 227-235
[4] IU Kai1 WU Zaixin2 YANG Jizhong3 GUAN Haoyu4,5.Study of Dynamic Response and Fatigue Damage of High-speed Railway Tunnels under the Impact Load of Aircraft Landing[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 96-102
[5] FENG Yi.Two-Stage Safety Analysis of Overlapped Shield Tunnels Based on Dynamic Loads[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 109-116
[6] ZOU Pengxu1,2 LIU Mengyuan1,2 CHEN Liangzhi1,.Study on the Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Coupling System of Submerged Floating Tunnel Tubes and Anchor Cables under Wave Action[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 154-162
[7] HUANG Zhongkai1 ZHANG Dongmei1,2.Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of the Shallow-buried Shield Tunnel in Soft Soil Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 51-60
[8] REN Lei1 NIU Bin2 GUO Ting2 LIU Songyu2.Study on the Influence of Flexibility Ratio on Tunnel Seismic Dynamic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 67-73
[9] TIAN Zhiwang1 XU Youjun2.Study on the Law of Transverse Seismic Response of Two Paralleled Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(2): 57-64
[10] .Effect of Seismic Parameters on the Safety Factor for an Underground Cavern[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(3): 98-105
[11] .Analysis of 3D Dynamic Response of Immersed Tunnels Based on Finite Element/Infinite Element[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(3): 106-111
[12] GAO Xinjun.Seismic Response of Subway Tunnels in Complicated Geological Conditions to an Oblique Incident Wave[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(1): 78-84
[13] CHEN Yun1,2 DING Zhi2 WEI Xinjiang2 GE Guobao3 ZHOU Lianying2.Metro Operation-Induced Dynamic Response of Foundation Soil for Different Degrees of Consolidation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(1): 140-147
[14] SUN Xiaojing1 TAN Zhongsheng1 ZHOU Sizhen2 FENG Hongxi1 CHAO Kai1.Analysis of the Dynamic Influence of Aircraft Load on a Tunnel Structure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(1): 156-163
[15] .Frequency Domain Dynamic Response of a Submerged Floating Tunnel Anchor Cable under Random Wave Force Excitation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,54(6): 174-179
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY