Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2012, Vol. 49 Issue (1) :12-19    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
A Study of the Criterion for the Stability of a Tunnel in a Jointed Rock Mass
(School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The instability model and criterion for the stability of tunnels in jointed rock masses have been a subject of debate, and no scientific and reasonable standard has been reached for the subject so far. The empirical value of the displacement around the tunnel and plastic zone is deemed the criterion for stability of surrounding rock; elastic modulus and the shape of a tunnel have a great influence on the displacement around the tunnel. Additionally, displacements around a tunnel are unequal at different positions. For these reasons, it is difficult to settle upon a unified criterion. The empirical value of the plastic zone is superior to the displacement around the tunnel when it comes to the stability criterion. The plastification of surrounding material reflects the plastic dynamic mechanics of continuous media, but it cannot be adopted to quantitatively evaluate the tunnel stability in a jointed rock mass in which failure is induced by a preferred structural plane. Therefore, combined with the shapes and changes of micro-joints, the instability mode and quantitative criterion for the stability of a tunnel are studied by means of UDEC, and the relationship of the mechanisms of micro-structure and macro-mechanical behavior is analyzed. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The structural plane greatly weakens the mechanic property of the rock mass and its stability. Deformation and the strength of the structural plane play the controlling role in tunnel stability; (2) In the jointed rock mass, the disturbance zone of the surrounding rock is divided into failure shape, open zone and shear and slip zone. The failure means the instability mode of the tunnel, and the open zone means that surrounding rock is under the shedding critical condition, which creates a potential landslide area; (3) The shear and slip zone is the main cause of progressive damage of rock masses, so the shear zone is proposed as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass. Based on its strict mechanical foundation, the stability of a rock mass can be evaluated quantitatively. Using the Muzhailing Tunnel of the Lanzhou-Chongqing Passenger Dedicated Line as an example, the mechanical effects of surrounding rock are investigated before and after the implementation of bolt support, which verified the reliability, rationality and feasibility of using the shear and slip zone as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Zhi-Qiang
He-Ben-Guo
Guan-Bao-Shu
KeywordsJointed rock mass   Criterion of judgment   Shear and slip zone   Stability of tunnel   UDEC      
Abstract: The instability model and criterion for the stability of tunnels in jointed rock masses have been a subject of debate, and no scientific and reasonable standard has been reached for the subject so far. The empirical value of the displacement around the tunnel and plastic zone is deemed the criterion for stability of surrounding rock; elastic modulus and the shape of a tunnel have a great influence on the displacement around the tunnel. Additionally, displacements around a tunnel are unequal at different positions. For these reasons, it is difficult to settle upon a unified criterion. The empirical value of the plastic zone is superior to the displacement around the tunnel when it comes to the stability criterion. The plastification of surrounding material reflects the plastic dynamic mechanics of continuous media, but it cannot be adopted to quantitatively evaluate the tunnel stability in a jointed rock mass in which failure is induced by a preferred structural plane. Therefore, combined with the shapes and changes of micro-joints, the instability mode and quantitative criterion for the stability of a tunnel are studied by means of UDEC, and the relationship of the mechanisms of micro-structure and macro-mechanical behavior is analyzed. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The structural plane greatly weakens the mechanic property of the rock mass and its stability. Deformation and the strength of the structural plane play the controlling role in tunnel stability; (2) In the jointed rock mass, the disturbance zone of the surrounding rock is divided into failure shape, open zone and shear and slip zone. The failure means the instability mode of the tunnel, and the open zone means that surrounding rock is under the shedding critical condition, which creates a potential landslide area; (3) The shear and slip zone is the main cause of progressive damage of rock masses, so the shear zone is proposed as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass. Based on its strict mechanical foundation, the stability of a rock mass can be evaluated quantitatively. Using the Muzhailing Tunnel of the Lanzhou-Chongqing Passenger Dedicated Line as an example, the mechanical effects of surrounding rock are investigated before and after the implementation of bolt support, which verified the reliability, rationality and feasibility of using the shear and slip zone as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass.
KeywordsJointed rock mass,   Criterion of judgment,   Shear and slip zone,   Stability of tunnel,   UDEC      
published: 2011-09-13
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Zhi-Qiang, He-Ben-Guo, Guan-Bao-Shu .A Study of the Criterion for the Stability of a Tunnel in a Jointed Rock Mass[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2012,V49(1): 12-19
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2012/V49/I1/12
 
No references of article
[1] YUAN Bin1 XU Fanxian2 LIAO Huan3 ZHONG Yutian3 LUO Gang3.Study on the Influence of the Spatial Combination Relationship of Structural Planes on the Stability of Tunnel Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 107-114
[2] ZI Xiaoyu1 SHEN Yusheng1 ZHU Shuangyan1 LUO Ningning2 YANG Jiaqi1 CAO Bangjun1.Study on the Deformation Failure Laws and Support Measures for Tunnels in Layered Phyllite[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 196-204
[3] WANG Bo-1, GUO Xin-Xin-1, HE Chuan-1, WU De-Xing-2.[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 1-10
[4] Shu Heng, Wu Shuyuan, Li Jian, Guo Xiaohong.Health Monitoring Design for Extra-Large Diameter Underwater Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 32-40
[5] Tuo Yongfei, Guo Xiaohong.General Design and Key Technologies of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 1-6
[6] Lin Xin1, Shu Heng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Yang Linsong1, Li Jin1, Guo Xiaohong1.Study of the Longitudial Profile Optimization of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels in Mixed Ground with Very High Water Pressure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 7-14
[7] Yao Zhanhu1, Yang Zhao2, Tian Yi1, Hu Huitao1.Key Construction Technology for the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 15-23
[8] Liu Guangfeng1, Chen Fangwei2, Zhou Zhi1, Zhang Shilong3, Liu Mingqiang1.Identification of Investment Risks for River-Crossing Tunnels Based on Grey Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 41-48
[9] Yao Zhanhu.Construction Risk Assessment for the Shield-Driven Section of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 49-54
[10] Zhang Boyang1, Zhao Xiaopeng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Chen Yu1.Risk Control for Saturated Hyperbaric Intervention in Slurry Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 55-61
[11] Li Xinyu, Zhang Dingli, Fang Qian, Song Haoran.On Water Burst Patterns in Underwater Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 24-31
[12] Zhang Han1,2, Li Yingming1,3, Ren Fangtao2, Yang Mingdong3.Elasto-Plastic Analysis of the Surrounding Rock of a Tunnel/Roadway Based on the Zienkiewicz-Pande Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 30-35
[13] Zhou Zelin, Chen Shougen, Li Yansong.Study of the Mechanical Characteristics of the Support Structure of a Deeply Buried Diversion Tunnel in Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 36-43
[14] Liu Qiang1, Tan Zhongsheng1, Chen Libao2, Zou Xiaoxin1.Field Tests Regaring the Uncertainty of the Calculation Model for Soil Filling Pressure on Open-Cut Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 128-134
[15] Li Yufeng1,2, Peng Limin1, Lei Mingfeng1,2.Dynamics Issues Regarding High-Speed Railway Crossing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 8-15
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY