,Transversely isotropic rock mass,Geostress,Finite element model,Stress error," /> Influence of Formation Dip Angle on the Geostress Calculation of a Transversely Isotropic Rock Mass
 
   Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2013, Vol. 50 Issue (5) :75-79    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Influence of Formation Dip Angle on the Geostress Calculation of a Transversely Isotropic Rock Mass
(Faculty of Architecture Engineering, Zhengzhou Vocational College of Economics and Trade, Zhengzhou 450002)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The 3D geostress is an important parameter in the structural design and construction of underground works. Overcoring stress relief is the most commonly used method to measure geostress at present, but it cannot take into account the influence of the formation dip angle. In engineering applications, ignoring or modifying the influence of the formation dip angle can often cause greater errors in geostress measurement. According to the calculation principle of finite element method, solutions for geostress measurement of a transversely isotropic rock mass were studied with the formation dip angle varying from 0°~ 90° in order to make appropriate adjustments to the geostress values measured during tunneling. The results show that the formation dip angle chiefly has a great influence on the normal stress in the plane perpendicular to the hole, with the tendency to increase at first and then decrease; and the influence is most obvious at 45° of the formation dip angle, with the errors of the first, second, and third principal stress being 19.00%, 10.86% and 88.98% respectively.
Service
Email this article   Transversely isotropic rock mass; Geostress; Finite element model; Stress error

”. Please open it by linking:" name=neirong>
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Keywords ')" href="#">

    Transversely isotropic rock mass   Geostress   Finite element model   Stress error     

Abstract: The 3D geostress is an important parameter in the structural design and construction of underground works. Overcoring stress relief is the most commonly used method to measure geostress at present, but it cannot take into account the influence of the formation dip angle. In engineering applications, ignoring or modifying the influence of the formation dip angle can often cause greater errors in geostress measurement. According to the calculation principle of finite element method, solutions for geostress measurement of a transversely isotropic rock mass were studied with the formation dip angle varying from 0°~ 90° in order to make appropriate adjustments to the geostress values measured during tunneling. The results show that the formation dip angle chiefly has a great influence on the normal stress in the plane perpendicular to the hole, with the tendency to increase at first and then decrease; and the influence is most obvious at 45° of the formation dip angle, with the errors of the first, second, and third principal stress being 19.00%, 10.86% and 88.98% respectively.
Keywords ')" href="#">

 ,   Transversely isotropic rock mass,   Geostress,   Finite element model,   Stress error     

Cite this article:   
.Influence of Formation Dip Angle on the Geostress Calculation of a Transversely Isotropic Rock Mass[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2013,V50(5): 75-79
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2013/V50/I5/75
 
No references of article
[1] WANG Bo-1, GUO Xin-Xin-1, HE Chuan-1, WU De-Xing-2.[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 1-10
[2] Tuo Yongfei, Guo Xiaohong.General Design and Key Technologies of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 1-6
[3] Lin Xin1, Shu Heng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Yang Linsong1, Li Jin1, Guo Xiaohong1.Study of the Longitudial Profile Optimization of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels in Mixed Ground with Very High Water Pressure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 7-14
[4] Yao Zhanhu1, Yang Zhao2, Tian Yi1, Hu Huitao1.Key Construction Technology for the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 15-23
[5] Li Xinyu, Zhang Dingli, Fang Qian, Song Haoran.On Water Burst Patterns in Underwater Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 24-31
[6] Shu Heng, Wu Shuyuan, Li Jian, Guo Xiaohong.Health Monitoring Design for Extra-Large Diameter Underwater Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 32-40
[7] Liu Guangfeng1, Chen Fangwei2, Zhou Zhi1, Zhang Shilong3, Liu Mingqiang1.Identification of Investment Risks for River-Crossing Tunnels Based on Grey Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 41-48
[8] Yao Zhanhu.Construction Risk Assessment for the Shield-Driven Section of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 49-54
[9] Zhang Boyang1, Zhao Xiaopeng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Chen Yu1.Risk Control for Saturated Hyperbaric Intervention in Slurry Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 55-61
[10] Li Yufeng1,2, Peng Limin1, Lei Mingfeng1,2.Dynamics Issues Regarding High-Speed Railway Crossing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 8-15
[11] Zhang Han1,2, Li Yingming1,3, Ren Fangtao2, Yang Mingdong3.Elasto-Plastic Analysis of the Surrounding Rock of a Tunnel/Roadway Based on the Zienkiewicz-Pande Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 30-35
[12] Zhou Zelin, Chen Shougen, Li Yansong.Study of the Mechanical Characteristics of the Support Structure of a Deeply Buried Diversion Tunnel in Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 36-43
[13] Jin Dalong, Li Xinggao.Model Test of the Relationship between the Face Support Pressure and Ground Surface Deformation of a Shield-Driven Tunnel in Sand Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 44-51
[14] Wang Yaqiong1,2, Zhou Shaowen1, Sun Tiejun3, Xie Yongli1.A Diagnosis Method for Lining Structure Conditions of Operated Tunnels Based on Asymmetric Closeness Degree[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 52-58
[15] Ji Xinbo1, Zhao Wen1, Han Jianyong1, Zhou Yongwei2, Yu Hongfu3.Parameter Analysis Considering the Impacts of the Support Structure on Ground Settlement and Inner Force During Center Drift Construction[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 59-66
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY