Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (5) :1-9    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Calculation Methods for the Bearing Capacity of SFRC Underground Structure Members
(Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (1181KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract This paper presents the deficiencies of the calculation method for the bearing capacity of SFRC underground structures in Chinese code, compares it with the Eurocode through case studies and gives relevant suggestions. The results show that: 1) the design methods and calculation formulas in the Chinese code and Eurocode are roughly the same in respect to the ultimate bearing capacity of normal sections, while they are different in the bearing capacity of oblique sections-the shearing resistance of the bending beam under the Chinese code is greater than that under the Eurocode, and the higher the beam height and the concrete grade, the greater the difference; 2) the Eurocode not only considers the shearing resistance of longitudinal tensile reinforcement but also has a greater influence coefficient of axial compressive force compared with the Chinese code; and 3) crack width can be reduced by 10% at a serviceability limit state under the national code, but much less than 60% under the Eurocode, and this is one of the main influence factors of the reinforcement ratio.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Shuai-Shuai
GAO
BO
LI Zhi-Ye
ZHANG Bo-Hua-
KeywordsSFRC   Design method   Large eccentric compression   Ultimate limit state   Serviceability limit state   Code comparison     
Abstract: This paper presents the deficiencies of the calculation method for the bearing capacity of SFRC underground structures in Chinese code, compares it with the Eurocode through case studies and gives relevant suggestions. The results show that: 1) the design methods and calculation formulas in the Chinese code and Eurocode are roughly the same in respect to the ultimate bearing capacity of normal sections, while they are different in the bearing capacity of oblique sections-the shearing resistance of the bending beam under the Chinese code is greater than that under the Eurocode, and the higher the beam height and the concrete grade, the greater the difference; 2) the Eurocode not only considers the shearing resistance of longitudinal tensile reinforcement but also has a greater influence coefficient of axial compressive force compared with the Chinese code; and 3) crack width can be reduced by 10% at a serviceability limit state under the national code, but much less than 60% under the Eurocode, and this is one of the main influence factors of the reinforcement ratio.
KeywordsSFRC,   Design method,   Large eccentric compression,   Ultimate limit state,   Serviceability limit state,   Code comparison     
Cite this article:   
WANG Shuai-Shuai, GAO , BO etc .Calculation Methods for the Bearing Capacity of SFRC Underground Structure Members[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(5): 1-9
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2015/V52/I5/1
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY