Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (4) :123-128    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Experimental Study on the Optimal Interval of Exhaust Outlets in a Concentrated Smoke Extraction System
(1 School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081; 2 Key Laboratory of Building Fire Protection Engineering and Technology of MPS, Tianjin 300381)
Download: PDF (2903KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The spacing of exhaust outlets is a key factor for the concentrated smoke extraction system, which impacts the smoke control effect. A 22 m-long tunnel model with 1∶20 scale was used to test the effects of a concentrated smoke extraction system with four bi-directional exhaust outlets opened symmetrically with a spacing of 3 m and 5 m, respectively. A contrastive analysis of the temperature beneath the tunnel roof, spread length and thickness of the smoke layer was then carried out with those two different spacings. Results show that while both of the spacings can meet the requirements of safe smoke extraction in tunnel fires, it is safer and more conservative to choose the 3 m spacing, which means the design of an exhaust outlet with 3 m spacing is better than that with 5 m spacing.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
JIANG Xue-Peng- 1 Wang-Cheng-Wei- 1 Yu-Nian-Hao- 2
KeywordsTunnel   Spacing of exhaust outlets   Concentrated smoke extraction   Smoke control   Model test     
Abstract: The spacing of exhaust outlets is a key factor for the concentrated smoke extraction system, which impacts the smoke control effect. A 22 m-long tunnel model with 1∶20 scale was used to test the effects of a concentrated smoke extraction system with four bi-directional exhaust outlets opened symmetrically with a spacing of 3 m and 5 m, respectively. A contrastive analysis of the temperature beneath the tunnel roof, spread length and thickness of the smoke layer was then carried out with those two different spacings. Results show that while both of the spacings can meet the requirements of safe smoke extraction in tunnel fires, it is safer and more conservative to choose the 3 m spacing, which means the design of an exhaust outlet with 3 m spacing is better than that with 5 m spacing.
KeywordsTunnel,   Spacing of exhaust outlets,   Concentrated smoke extraction,   Smoke control,   Model test     
Cite this article:   
JIANG Xue-Peng- 1 Wang-Cheng-Wei- 1 Yu-Nian-Hao- 2 .Experimental Study on the Optimal Interval of Exhaust Outlets in a Concentrated Smoke Extraction System[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(4): 123-128
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I4/123
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY