Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (5) :17-24    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Research on the Influential Factors of Lining Detection by Non-Contact GPR Vehicle-Based Detection System
(1 Geotechnical Research Institute, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038; 2 School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044; 3 The Testing Institute of Base-Structure of CARS, Beijing 100044)
Download: PDF (4585KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Based on numerical modeling and field testing, this paper discusses several key technical problems of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) regarding the change from traditional contact detection technology to non-contact multi-channel detection technology, especially the influences of detection distance, detection speed and antenna selection of non-contact GPR technology on detection results. The following can be observed from the results: 1) 200 mm is the best detection distance, from which the geological radar signal can form an entire clear radar graph to identify lining quality defects by employing horizontal high-pass filtering, eliminating background and vertical filtering gain. From the radar graph, a tunnel lining defect can be accurately identified, with a lining thickness detection precision of ±3 cm; 2) with a detection speed of 20 km/h, the radar graph is clear and the vehicle-based system performs well in both defect identification and detection efficiency; 3) For defect identification at the bottom of the tunnel, 400 MHz horn antenna can obtain a clearer hierarchy and defect image than the 400 MHz shielded antenna; 4)Most defects can be identified by the GPR graph by applying combined 400 MHz+900 MHZ antennas using mutual rectification. Employing antennas of different frequencies is effective to improving the efficiency and precision of the vehicle-based detection system. This research provides an important technical reference for the development of the non-contact GPR vehicle-based detection system in China.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CAO Rui-Lang- 1 Qi-Fa-Lin- 2
3 He-Shao-Hui- 2
KeywordsGround Penetrating Radar   Tunnel defects   Horn antenna   Non-contact inspection   Vehicle-based de? tection system     
Abstract: Based on numerical modeling and field testing, this paper discusses several key technical problems of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) regarding the change from traditional contact detection technology to non-contact multi-channel detection technology, especially the influences of detection distance, detection speed and antenna selection of non-contact GPR technology on detection results. The following can be observed from the results: 1) 200 mm is the best detection distance, from which the geological radar signal can form an entire clear radar graph to identify lining quality defects by employing horizontal high-pass filtering, eliminating background and vertical filtering gain. From the radar graph, a tunnel lining defect can be accurately identified, with a lining thickness detection precision of ±3 cm; 2) with a detection speed of 20 km/h, the radar graph is clear and the vehicle-based system performs well in both defect identification and detection efficiency; 3) For defect identification at the bottom of the tunnel, 400 MHz horn antenna can obtain a clearer hierarchy and defect image than the 400 MHz shielded antenna; 4)Most defects can be identified by the GPR graph by applying combined 400 MHz+900 MHZ antennas using mutual rectification. Employing antennas of different frequencies is effective to improving the efficiency and precision of the vehicle-based detection system. This research provides an important technical reference for the development of the non-contact GPR vehicle-based detection system in China.
KeywordsGround Penetrating Radar,   Tunnel defects,   Horn antenna,   Non-contact inspection,   Vehicle-based de? tection system     
Cite this article:   
CAO Rui-Lang- 1 Qi-Fa-Lin- 2, 3 He-Shao-Hui- 2 .Research on the Influential Factors of Lining Detection by Non-Contact GPR Vehicle-Based Detection System[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(5): 17-24
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I5/17
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY