Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :48-55    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Analysis of the Reliability of Advanced Geological Prediction during TunnelConstruction Based on the Attribute Recognition Theory
(1 The Navy Engineering Design and Research Academy, Beijing 100070; 2 College of Defense Engineering, PLA University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210007)
Download: PDF (1216KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Advanced geological prediction is an important technical measure that foresees unfavorable geological conditions in front of the working face and reduces the risk associated with construction. In order to ensure the accuracy and reliability of predicted geological information, an assessment model based on attribute recognition theory is developed for assessing the reliability of advanced geological prediction in tunnels. Considering the influential factors for prediction reliability, and with respect to the scheme, technician, equipment, environment and management,etc., the number of prediction methods, the career time of technicians, the maintenance frequency of the equipment,the number of people and equipment that have nothing to do with prediction, and the rationality of prediction management is selected as the assessment index, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the indexes are conducted,and the classification criteria for the indexes is determined. The index weight is calculated by integrating a simple correlation function. The assessment indexes acquired by site investigation and the attribute measure function are used to calculate a single index attribute measure and comprehensive attribute measure of the predicted tunnel section, and the reliability of the advanced geological prediction results is assessed by the confidence criterion. The practical case shows the attribute assessment results are consistent with the actual situation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsAdvanced geological prediction   Tunnel construction   Prediction reliability assessment   Attribute rec? og     
Abstract: Advanced geological prediction is an important technical measure that foresees unfavorable geological conditions in front of the working face and reduces the risk associated with construction. In order to ensure the accuracy and reliability of predicted geological information, an assessment model based on attribute recognition theory is developed for assessing the reliability of advanced geological prediction in tunnels. Considering the influential factors for prediction reliability, and with respect to the scheme, technician, equipment, environment and management,etc., the number of prediction methods, the career time of technicians, the maintenance frequency of the equipment,the number of people and equipment that have nothing to do with prediction, and the rationality of prediction management is selected as the assessment index, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the indexes are conducted,and the classification criteria for the indexes is determined. The index weight is calculated by integrating a simple correlation function. The assessment indexes acquired by site investigation and the attribute measure function are used to calculate a single index attribute measure and comprehensive attribute measure of the predicted tunnel section, and the reliability of the advanced geological prediction results is assessed by the confidence criterion. The practical case shows the attribute assessment results are consistent with the actual situation.
KeywordsAdvanced geological prediction,   Tunnel construction,   Prediction reliability assessment,   Attribute rec? og     
Cite this article:   
.Analysis of the Reliability of Advanced Geological Prediction during TunnelConstruction Based on the Attribute Recognition Theory[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 48-55
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/48
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY