Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :97-106    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Prediction and Analysis of Ground Displacement and Stress Caused by the Excavation of a Shallow-Buried Shield Tunnel in a Compound Stratum
(1 School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075; 2 National Engineering Laboratory for Construction Technology of High Speed Railway, Central South University, Changsha 410075)
Download: PDF (4585KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To reveal the distribution of ground displacement and stress caused by the excavation of a shallow-bur? ied shield tunnel in a compound stratum, the Покровский equivalent layer method was applied to simplify the problem into a solution for the displacement and stress distribution in a homogeneous formation. Using the modified Loganathan′s formula, the expressions of ground displacement and strain component and stress component were deduced, and a displacement field distribution prediction model was established. Based on a theoretical prediction model, the predicted and measured values were compared, and the effects of elasticity modulus ratio n of the upper and lower soil layers, the depth of tunnel z and the Poisson ratio μ on tunnel excavation are also discussed. As for a tunnel excavation in a soft interbed stratum, the equivalent thickness K of the soft interbed stratum is introduced.The research results show that: 1) with an increase of the n value, the maximum surface settlement Smax, maximum additional horizontal stress σx and vertical stress σz decrease; 2) with an increase of the z value, the maximum settle? ment increases; 3) with an increase of the μ value, the Smax value decreases and the maximum additional horizontal stress and vertical stress increase; 4) with an increase of the K value, the Smax value increases; and 5) during tunnel construction, displacement and stress diffusion occur in the stratum that is hard at the upper part and soft at the lower part, while displacement and stress concentration occur in the stratum that is soft at the upper part and hard at the lower part.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsShield tunnel   Stratum displacement   Stratum stress   Prediction model   Compound stratum     
Abstract: To reveal the distribution of ground displacement and stress caused by the excavation of a shallow-bur? ied shield tunnel in a compound stratum, the Покровский equivalent layer method was applied to simplify the problem into a solution for the displacement and stress distribution in a homogeneous formation. Using the modified Loganathan′s formula, the expressions of ground displacement and strain component and stress component were deduced, and a displacement field distribution prediction model was established. Based on a theoretical prediction model, the predicted and measured values were compared, and the effects of elasticity modulus ratio n of the upper and lower soil layers, the depth of tunnel z and the Poisson ratio μ on tunnel excavation are also discussed. As for a tunnel excavation in a soft interbed stratum, the equivalent thickness K of the soft interbed stratum is introduced.The research results show that: 1) with an increase of the n value, the maximum surface settlement Smax, maximum additional horizontal stress σx and vertical stress σz decrease; 2) with an increase of the z value, the maximum settle? ment increases; 3) with an increase of the μ value, the Smax value decreases and the maximum additional horizontal stress and vertical stress increase; 4) with an increase of the K value, the Smax value increases; and 5) during tunnel construction, displacement and stress diffusion occur in the stratum that is hard at the upper part and soft at the lower part, while displacement and stress concentration occur in the stratum that is soft at the upper part and hard at the lower part.
KeywordsShield tunnel,   Stratum displacement,   Stratum stress,   Prediction model,   Compound stratum     
Cite this article:   
.Prediction and Analysis of Ground Displacement and Stress Caused by the Excavation of a Shallow-Buried Shield Tunnel in a Compound Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 97-106
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/97
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY