Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (2) :134-    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
In-situ Test and Analysis of Mechanical Behaviors of the Mid-wall of Multi-arch Loess Tunnels
(1 Shaanxi Provincial Major Laboratory for Highway Bridge & Tunnel, Chang’an University, Xi′an 710064; 2 School of Science, Xi′an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi′an 710055)
Download: PDF (4773KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The mid-wall of a multi-arch tunnel is an important loading component and has direct impact on tunnel safety and economy. In order to understand the mechanical behaviors of the mid-wall of a multi-arch loess tunnel,systematic test and analysis were conducted based on a multi-arch loess tunnel in northern Shaanxi province regarding contacting pressure on top and bottom of the middle-wall, axial force of anchor bolt in middle pilot heading and axial force of rebar meter at the middle-wall as well as internal force of the mid-wall using the steel wire transducer.The test results indicate that the pressure at the bottom of mid-wall approximately take a saddle shape, which is large on both sides and small in the middle and the pressure at the base is larger than the contacting pressure at the top of middle pilot heading; axial force of anchor bolt is small, peak axial force occurs at shallow-buried part of rock mass and axial force at the deep-buried part is about 10% of that in shallow-buried section, the support effect of anchor bolt at middle pilot heading is not obvious and anchor bolt can be canceled at this place; the axial force of rebar meter at middle-wall is increasing towards the bottom and it’s more sensitive to the force on the upper part of midwall compared with that on the lower part; the max. force of mid-wall occurs at the left lower side of mid-wall, and stress release of the right and left tubes has certain "rectification" effect on force of mid-wall but the mid-wall has always been affected by asymmetric pressure; the calculated max. axial force of mid-wall is about 583 kN, the max.bending moment is about 45 kN·m, the mid-wall is stable, the max. longitudinal torque is around 79 kN·m and the internal force is very complex.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
QIU Junling1 LAI Jinxing1
2 GUO Chunxia2 FAN Haobo1 XIE Yongli1
KeywordsLoess tunnel   Multi-arch tunnel   Mid-wall   In-situ test   Mechanical behavior     
Abstract: The mid-wall of a multi-arch tunnel is an important loading component and has direct impact on tunnel safety and economy. In order to understand the mechanical behaviors of the mid-wall of a multi-arch loess tunnel,systematic test and analysis were conducted based on a multi-arch loess tunnel in northern Shaanxi province regarding contacting pressure on top and bottom of the middle-wall, axial force of anchor bolt in middle pilot heading and axial force of rebar meter at the middle-wall as well as internal force of the mid-wall using the steel wire transducer.The test results indicate that the pressure at the bottom of mid-wall approximately take a saddle shape, which is large on both sides and small in the middle and the pressure at the base is larger than the contacting pressure at the top of middle pilot heading; axial force of anchor bolt is small, peak axial force occurs at shallow-buried part of rock mass and axial force at the deep-buried part is about 10% of that in shallow-buried section, the support effect of anchor bolt at middle pilot heading is not obvious and anchor bolt can be canceled at this place; the axial force of rebar meter at middle-wall is increasing towards the bottom and it’s more sensitive to the force on the upper part of midwall compared with that on the lower part; the max. force of mid-wall occurs at the left lower side of mid-wall, and stress release of the right and left tubes has certain "rectification" effect on force of mid-wall but the mid-wall has always been affected by asymmetric pressure; the calculated max. axial force of mid-wall is about 583 kN, the max.bending moment is about 45 kN·m, the mid-wall is stable, the max. longitudinal torque is around 79 kN·m and the internal force is very complex.
KeywordsLoess tunnel,   Multi-arch tunnel,   Mid-wall,   In-situ test,   Mechanical behavior     
Cite this article:   
QIU Junling1 LAI Jinxing1, 2 GUO Chunxia2 FAN Haobo1 XIE Yongli1 .In-situ Test and Analysis of Mechanical Behaviors of the Mid-wall of Multi-arch Loess Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(2): 134-
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I2/134
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY