[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2022, Vol. 59 Issue (3) :172-182    DOI:
试验与监测 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
内支撑式和悬臂式锁口钢管桩基坑围护结构变形对比试验分析
(1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,武汉 430074;2. 广西大学土木建筑工程学院,南宁 530004;3. 上海建工集团股份有限公司,上海 200080)
Comparative Test and Analysis of the Deformation in Enclosure Structure of Internally-braced and Cantilevered Locked Steel-pipe Pile Foundation Pits
(1. School of Engineering (Wuhan), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Guangxi University, Nanning 530004; 3. Shanghai Construction Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200080)
Download: PDF (5480KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 锁口钢管桩通过桩身锁口接头相互连接可形成排桩式围护结构,在软土地区基坑工程中应用广泛。为探明悬臂式与内支撑式锁口钢管桩围护结构的受力变形特点及差异,分别开展了锁口钢管桩悬臂式和内支撑式围护基坑开挖相似模型试验,并采用3D打印技术制作带锁口接头的模型试验桩。试验过程中对桩顶水平位移、桩身应变和土体表面沉降进行实时监测与分析。试验结果表明:(1)通过3D打印制作锁口钢管桩模型具有精度高、速度快等优点,能极大地反映锁口钢管桩的接头特点;(2)对于锁口钢管桩悬臂式围护结构,从基坑开挖至围护结构失效前,土体沉降由凹槽型分布逐渐变为三角形分布,桩身弯矩反弯点出现在开挖面附近,并随开挖深度增加而下移,地表沉降极值与桩身水平位移极值之比(δvm /δhm)约为1,当围护结构失效后,反弯点位置几乎不再变化,地表最大沉降与桩身最大侧移之比(δvm /δhm)逐渐减小,在0.5~0.75之间;对于锁口钢管桩内支撑式围护结构,在相同开挖深度下,土体沉降呈凹槽型分布,桩身弯矩反弯点始终在开挖面处,地表最大沉降与桩身最大侧移之比(δvm/δhm)逐渐从0.5增大至1。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
梁荣柱 1
2 韦 实 1 王新新 3 孙廉威 3 吴小建 3
关键词基坑工程   围护结构   锁口钢管桩   3D打印技术   模型试验     
Abstract: Locked steel pipe (LSP) piles can form a row-pile enclosure structure by interconnecting the lock joints, and have been widely used in foundation pit projects in soft soil areas. To investigate the stress and deformation characteristics and differences between cantilevered and internally-braced LSP pile enclosure structures, this paper carries out similar model tests of the pit excavations of both cantilevered and internally-braced LSP pile enclosures respectively, and uses 3D printing technology to produce the piles with locked joints for the model tests. During the test, real-time monitoring and analysis were conducted for pile-top horizontal displacement, pile strain and soil surface settlement. The test results show that: (1) The LSP pile model made through 3D printing has the advantages of high precision and fast speed, implying that it can greatly reflect the joint characteristics of LSP piles; and (2) For the cantilevered enclosure structure with LSP piles, from the excavation of the foundation pit to the failure of the enclosure structure, the soil settlement distribution gradually shifts from a notch-type distribution to a triangle distribution, with the reverse-bending point of the pile moment appearing near the excavation surface and drops with the increase of the excavation depth. The ratio of the extreme value of the surface settlement to the extreme value of the horizontal displacement of the piles (δvm/δhm) is approximately 1, but when the enclosure structure loses its effectiveness, the position of the reverse-bending point almost has no change, while the ratio of the maximum settlement of the ground surface to the maximum lateral displacement of the piles (δvm/δhm) gradually decreases between the range of 0.5 and 0.75. For the internally-braced enclosure structure with LSP piles, under the same excavation depth, the soil settlement distribution is in a groove-type distribution, with the reverse-bending point of the pile moment remaining on the excavation surface the whole time, and the ratio of the maximum surface settlement to the maximum lateral displacement of the piles (δvm/δhm) gradually increases from 0.5 to 1.
KeywordsFoundation pit works,   Enclosure structure,   Locked steel pipe (LSP) piles,   3D printing technology,   Model test     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(41807262);上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划(19YF1421000).
作者简介: 梁荣柱(1988-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事绿色基坑结构支护体系方面的研究工作,E-mail: liangcug@163.com. 通讯作者:王新新(1985-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事地下工程装配式结构方面的工作,E-mail:569536173@qq.com.
引用本文:   
梁荣柱 1, 2 韦 实 1 王新新 3 孙廉威 3 吴小建 3 .内支撑式和悬臂式锁口钢管桩基坑围护结构变形对比试验分析[J]  现代隧道技术, 2022,V59(3): 172-182
LIANG Rongzhu1, 2 WEI Shi1 WANG Xinxin3 SUN Lianwei3 WU Xiaojian3 .Comparative Test and Analysis of the Deformation in Enclosure Structure of Internally-braced and Cantilevered Locked Steel-pipe Pile Foundation Pits[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,V59(3): 172-182
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2022/V59/I3/172
 
没有本文参考文献
[1] 郭永军1 李 超2 郑建国3 于永堂4 朱才辉5.地面堆载对西安黄土地层中既有盾构管片影响研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[2] 王敬勇1,2 王 平2 杨 锦2 吉 锋3.基于物理模型试验的碳质千枚岩隧道支护结构优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(3): 160-169
[3] 郭 盈 彭文庆 陈世强 张 琼 王佳伟.隧道行车道通风模型试验当量长度计算方法与验证[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 230-240
[4] 陈霞飞1,2 李兵伟1,2 张学民3,5 王立川2,3 罗志洋3 刘 蕊1,2 傅 蕾4.含砂复合地层基坑围护结构渗漏水影响与应急处治技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(2): 254-264
[5] 陶伟明1,2 朱星宇1,3 张志强1,3 于 航1,3 范 磊2.隧道管道型岩溶突水突泥灾变演化模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025,62(1): 221-230
[6] 张昕阳1,2 申玉生1,2 常铭宇1,2 王浩鱇1,2 潘笑海1,2 王岩岩1,2.基于GA-BP神经网络的隧道围岩相似材料配合比设计[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(6): 82-91
[7] 匡 亮1 粟 威1 陶伟明1 田四明2 申玉生3 黎 旭2 汪辉武1.跨走滑断层隧道结构影响分区及设防范围研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(6): 45-54
[8] 杨文东1 吴 洋1 王智德1 武海港1,2 李 根1.隧道开挖对既有桩基影响分区的试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(6): 200-208
[9] 杨春山1 徐世杨2 魏立新1 陈俊生3.垂直顶升作用下盾构隧道力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(5): 210-218
[10] 潘笑海1 申玉生1 王浩鱇1 王岩岩1 张昕阳1 张 熙1 左雷彬2.多破裂面走滑断层错动下隧道结构响应规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(4): 210-220
[11] 陈泽恩1,2 陈小峰1,2,3 孔祥苗4 张 欣5 张永强2 刁岳峰1 吴 珂1,2,3.分叉隧道合流段流动特征及局部损失特性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(3): 53-60
[12] 刘泓志1 徐善坤1 郭易东2,3 方应冉2,3 李兴高2,3.泥浆流变模型对泥水盾构排浆管道压力损失特性的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(1): 182-189
[13] 曾 毅1 高 越2,3 吴沛霖2,3 张小龙1 付艳斌2,3.既有盾构隧道抬升模型试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024,61(1): 200-207
[14] 马亚丽娜1, 2 陈雅琪1, 2 刘继国1, 2 崔 臻3 周光新4.跨走滑断层铰接式隧洞衬砌错断破坏机制研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 136-147
[15] 郭彩霞1,2 刘文杰2 张明聚2 李鹏飞2 高云昊2 单余含2.基坑工程钢支撑高脚螺栓-模袋混凝土固支端力学性能试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023,60(5): 277-
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术