[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
       首 页  |  期刊介绍  |  编委会  |  投稿指南  |  期刊订阅  |  广告合作  |  留言板  |  联系我们 |  English
现代隧道技术 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (6) :74-81    DOI:
理论研究与探讨 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
城市综合管廊廊内温度预测公式及应用研究
(1.西南交通大学土木工程学院,成都 610031;2.西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点试验室,成都 610031;3.那曲市双高绿色建筑研究有限责任公司,那曲 854000;4.中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司,武汉 430061;5. 西藏锦宸工程项目管理咨询有限公司,拉萨 850030)
Study on the Temperature Prediction Formula and Application in Urban Utility Tunnels
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031; 3. Nagqu Shuanggao Green Building Research Co., Ltd., Nagqu 854000; 4. Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Wuhan 430061; 5. Tibet Jinchen Engineering Project Management Consulting Co., Ltd., Lhasa 850030)
Download: PDF (3940KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
摘要 城市综合管廊廊内温度是影响其安全运营的重要因素,为了解决综合管廊廊内温度预测困难的问题,基于传热理论建立综合管廊廊内温度预测公式。首先,根据管廊与土壤传热过程推导管廊内热平衡方程;其次,通过引入管廊空气壁面温度差拟合公式,建立管廊廊内温度预测公式;最后,将预测公式计算结果与实测数据和数值模拟结果进行对比。研究结果表明:综合管廊廊内温度预测公式具有一定的准确性,其计算结果与实测数据相比,空气温度平均误差为1.57%,壁面温度平均误差为12.14%,与数值模拟结果对比,差值在1.8 ℃内。应用该公式对成都市某管廊进行温度分析,该管廊在8月~11月内无结露风险,且大气温度低于壁面温度,仅需要基本的换气通风;2月~5月为结露高风险期,大气温度高于壁面温度,除进行基本通风换气外,还需要增加风量以缓解结露现象。
Service
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
彭 子1
2 文 萌3 陈 媛4 邓 禹5 郭 春1
2
关键词城市综合管廊   温度预测公式   结露   通风策略     
Abstract: The temperature inside urban utility tunnels is a critical factor affecting their safe operation. To address the challenges of predicting tunnel interior temperature, a temperature prediction formula for utility tunnels is developed based on heat transfer theory. Firstly, the thermal equilibrium equation of the tunnel interior is derived by analyzing the heat transfer process between the tunnel and the surrounding soil. Secondly, a parameterized prediction formula for tunnel interior temperature is established by introducing a fitting formula for the temperature difference between the tunnel air and wall surfaces. Finally, the results of the prediction formula are compared with measured data and numerical simulation results.The study results demonstrate that the proposed temperature prediction formula has reasonable accuracy. Compared to measured data, the average error for air temperature is 1.57%, and for wall surface temperature, it is 12.14%. When compared with numerical simulation results, the temperature difference remains within 1.8°C.The formula is applied to analyze the temperature of a utility tunnel in Chengdu. Results indicate no risk of condensation from August to November, as the atmospheric temperature is lower than the wall surface temperature, requiring only basic ventilation. However, during February to May, condensation risk is high due to atmospheric temperatures exceeding wall surface temperatures. In this period, in addition to basic ventilation, an increased airflow rate is necessary to mitigate condensation.
KeywordsUrban utility tunnel,   Temperature prediction formula,   Condensation,   Ventilation strategy     
基金资助:四川省交通运输科技项目(2021-ZL-04);中国交通教育研究会教育科学研究课题(JT2022YB163,JT2022YB405).
作者简介: 彭 子(2000-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作,E-mail:673345402@qq.com. 通讯作者:郭 春(1979-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程领域的教学与研究工作,E-mail: guochun@swjtu.edu.cn.
引用本文:   
彭 子1, 2 文 萌3 陈 媛4 邓 禹5 郭 春1, 2 .城市综合管廊廊内温度预测公式及应用研究[J]  现代隧道技术, 2024,V61(6): 74-81
PENG Zi1, 2 WEN Meng3 CHEN Yuan4 DENG Yu5 GUO Chun1, 2 .Study on the Temperature Prediction Formula and Application in Urban Utility Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(6): 74-81
链接本文:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/CN/Y2024/V61/I6/74
 
没有本文参考文献
Copyright 2010 by 现代隧道技术