Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2013, Vol. 50 Issue (6) :39-43    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Risk Assessment of Tunnel Construction Schedule and Cost Based on the Alteration of Rock Mass Classifications
(1 School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;
2 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Complex geological conditions and information gaps often necessitate design alterations during tunnel construction. The alteration of rock mass classifications makes it especially difficult to control the construction schedule and cost. Considering the effects of the alteration of surrounding rock classifications on the construction period and cost, a Monte Carlo Simulation-based model was established by using the alteration probability of each rock mass classification, construction time, and cost per linear meter as random variables. Through the empirical study of a double-track tunnel, the practicability and feasibility of the model was verified, and a new method is provided for reasonably determining and assessing the construction schedule and cost of a tunnel.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Keywords     
Abstract: Complex geological conditions and information gaps often necessitate design alterations during tunnel construction. The alteration of rock mass classifications makes it especially difficult to control the construction schedule and cost. Considering the effects of the alteration of surrounding rock classifications on the construction period and cost, a Monte Carlo Simulation-based model was established by using the alteration probability of each rock mass classification, construction time, and cost per linear meter as random variables. Through the empirical study of a double-track tunnel, the practicability and feasibility of the model was verified, and a new method is provided for reasonably determining and assessing the construction schedule and cost of a tunnel.
Keywords     
published: 2013-06-28
Cite this article:   
.Risk Assessment of Tunnel Construction Schedule and Cost Based on the Alteration of Rock Mass Classifications[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2013,V50(6): 39-43
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2013/V50/I6/39
 
No references of article
[1] ZI Xiaoyu1 SHEN Yusheng1 ZHU Shuangyan1 LUO Ningning2 YANG Jiaqi1 CAO Bangjun1.Study on the Deformation Failure Laws and Support Measures for Tunnels in Layered Phyllite[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 196-204
[2] WANG Bo-1, GUO Xin-Xin-1, HE Chuan-1, WU De-Xing-2.[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,55(5): 1-10
[3] Shu Heng, Wu Shuyuan, Li Jian, Guo Xiaohong.Health Monitoring Design for Extra-Large Diameter Underwater Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 32-40
[4] Tuo Yongfei, Guo Xiaohong.General Design and Key Technologies of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 1-6
[5] Lin Xin1, Shu Heng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Yang Linsong1, Li Jin1, Guo Xiaohong1.Study of the Longitudial Profile Optimization of Large-Diameter Shield Tunnels in Mixed Ground with Very High Water Pressure[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 7-14
[6] Yao Zhanhu1, Yang Zhao2, Tian Yi1, Hu Huitao1.Key Construction Technology for the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 15-23
[7] Liu Guangfeng1, Chen Fangwei2, Zhou Zhi1, Zhang Shilong3, Liu Mingqiang1.Identification of Investment Risks for River-Crossing Tunnels Based on Grey Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 41-48
[8] Yao Zhanhu.Construction Risk Assessment for the Shield-Driven Section of the Nanjing Weisan Road River-Crossing Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 49-54
[9] Zhang Boyang1, Zhao Xiaopeng1, Zhang Yaguo2, Chen Yu1.Risk Control for Saturated Hyperbaric Intervention in Slurry Shield Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 55-61
[10] Li Xinyu, Zhang Dingli, Fang Qian, Song Haoran.On Water Burst Patterns in Underwater Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(4): 24-31
[11] Zhang Han1,2, Li Yingming1,3, Ren Fangtao2, Yang Mingdong3.Elasto-Plastic Analysis of the Surrounding Rock of a Tunnel/Roadway Based on the Zienkiewicz-Pande Criterion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 30-35
[12] Zhou Zelin, Chen Shougen, Li Yansong.Study of the Mechanical Characteristics of the Support Structure of a Deeply Buried Diversion Tunnel in Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 36-43
[13] Liu Qiang1, Tan Zhongsheng1, Chen Libao2, Zou Xiaoxin1.Field Tests Regaring the Uncertainty of the Calculation Model for Soil Filling Pressure on Open-Cut Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 128-134
[14] Li Yufeng1,2, Peng Limin1, Lei Mingfeng1,2.Dynamics Issues Regarding High-Speed Railway Crossing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 8-15
[15] Jin Dalong, Li Xinggao.Model Test of the Relationship between the Face Support Pressure and Ground Surface Deformation of a Shield-Driven Tunnel in Sand Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,52(2): 44-51
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY