Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (6) :12-18    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Design Optimization of the Support Reinforcement at the Portal Section of a Highway Tunnel
(1 Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Beijing 100082; 2 Guangxi Hualan Geotechnical Engineering Co. Ltd., Nanning 530001)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In light of the existing problems regarding the reinforcement design of support at the portal sections of highway tunnels, and based on the characteristics of surrounding rock and its loading at the portal and shallow-buried tunnel sections, this paper analyzes supporting features under different rock conditions by considering the action mechanisms of pipe-roof support, primary support, and secondary linings, and gives relevant suggestions for the above two sections. The results show that due to fractured surrounding rock and its poor self-stability at the portal section, the advance support plays an important role in enhancing the early stability of the rock, the primary support serves as the main bearing structure, and the secondary lining can be used to share part of load with a certain safety reserve. Thus, for the portal section it is better to strengthen the advance support and the primary support instead of the secondary lining, since the loads at the portal section are less than that at the shallow-buried section. Additionally, because of the intact surrounding rock and its certain self-stability at the shallow-buried section, the secondary lining serves as the main bearing structure and the primary support gives play to adhesion for better coordination between the surrounding rock and the support structure. Consequently, it is better to strengthen the secondary lining at the shallow-buried section and choose the best time for installation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WU Jin-Gang-1
SONG Yan-Bin-1
CHEN Ren-Dong-1
CHEN Dao-Song-2
KeywordsHighway tunnel   Reinforcement at the portal section   Support structure   Loading characteristics   Action mechanism     
Abstract: In light of the existing problems regarding the reinforcement design of support at the portal sections of highway tunnels, and based on the characteristics of surrounding rock and its loading at the portal and shallow-buried tunnel sections, this paper analyzes supporting features under different rock conditions by considering the action mechanisms of pipe-roof support, primary support, and secondary linings, and gives relevant suggestions for the above two sections. The results show that due to fractured surrounding rock and its poor self-stability at the portal section, the advance support plays an important role in enhancing the early stability of the rock, the primary support serves as the main bearing structure, and the secondary lining can be used to share part of load with a certain safety reserve. Thus, for the portal section it is better to strengthen the advance support and the primary support instead of the secondary lining, since the loads at the portal section are less than that at the shallow-buried section. Additionally, because of the intact surrounding rock and its certain self-stability at the shallow-buried section, the secondary lining serves as the main bearing structure and the primary support gives play to adhesion for better coordination between the surrounding rock and the support structure. Consequently, it is better to strengthen the secondary lining at the shallow-buried section and choose the best time for installation.
KeywordsHighway tunnel,   Reinforcement at the portal section,   Support structure,   Loading characteristics,   Action mechanism     
published: 2013-08-29
Cite this article:   
WU Jin-Gang-1, SONG Yan-Bin-1, CHEN Ren-Dong-1 etc .Design Optimization of the Support Reinforcement at the Portal Section of a Highway Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(6): 12-18
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I6/12
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY