Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2014, Vol. 51 Issue (6) :41-49    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Discussion of the Seismic Failure Mechanism of a Tunnel Based on the Improved Dynamic Strength Reduction Method
(1 North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450011; 2 Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074)
Download: PDF (0KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To explore the failure mechanism of tunnel structures in earthquakes, a static field was imposed to dynamic calculation by shifting the boundary between static and dynamic, which was taken as an initial stress condition for the improvement of the dynamic strength reduction method, the feasibility of which was proven by a computing application. The improved dynamic strength reduction method is used to calculate and analyze the failure mechanism of deep and shallow buried tunnels under seismic action, and the results show that failure processes are different for tunnels with different depths. For the shallow-buried tunnel, failure begins at the two sides above the tunnel and gradually forms a fracture plane cutting through the ground; for the deep tunnel, the plastic strain first occurs at four stress-concentrated corners with a smaller plastic strain on the crown and floor, and then a continuous plastic strain zone is formed gradually from the two sides until failure finally occurs. In light of seismic action, this paper analyzes the factors affecting tunnel failure, studies the failure mechanism of tunnel structures of different surrounding rock grades, spans, structure types, and buried depths, and finally carries on a comparative analysis for each influence factor.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Chang-Xin-1
2
吕Xiao-Chun-1
KeywordsImproved dynamic strength reduction method   Tunnel   Seismic failure mechanism   Influence factor     
Abstract: To explore the failure mechanism of tunnel structures in earthquakes, a static field was imposed to dynamic calculation by shifting the boundary between static and dynamic, which was taken as an initial stress condition for the improvement of the dynamic strength reduction method, the feasibility of which was proven by a computing application. The improved dynamic strength reduction method is used to calculate and analyze the failure mechanism of deep and shallow buried tunnels under seismic action, and the results show that failure processes are different for tunnels with different depths. For the shallow-buried tunnel, failure begins at the two sides above the tunnel and gradually forms a fracture plane cutting through the ground; for the deep tunnel, the plastic strain first occurs at four stress-concentrated corners with a smaller plastic strain on the crown and floor, and then a continuous plastic strain zone is formed gradually from the two sides until failure finally occurs. In light of seismic action, this paper analyzes the factors affecting tunnel failure, studies the failure mechanism of tunnel structures of different surrounding rock grades, spans, structure types, and buried depths, and finally carries on a comparative analysis for each influence factor.
KeywordsImproved dynamic strength reduction method,   Tunnel,   Seismic failure mechanism,   Influence factor     
published: 2013-09-16
Cite this article:   
SUN Chang-Xin-1, 2 , 吕Xiao-Chun-1 .Discussion of the Seismic Failure Mechanism of a Tunnel Based on the Improved Dynamic Strength Reduction Method[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2014,V51(6): 41-49
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2014/V51/I6/41
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY