Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (2) :55-60    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Problems with the Calculation of Forces Applied to Tunnels Based on the Terzaghi Soil Arching Theory
(Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074)
Download: PDF (3412KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The Terzaghi soil arching theory has been widely used in force calculations for tunnel structures, howev? er, the theoretical explanation and experimental verification are not sufficient regarding the calculation width, lateral pressure coefficient and frictional coefficient, as well as for the soil arching pattern involved in the Terzaghi formula.Moreover, the technicians are not quite clear about the physical meaning of model parameters, and the selection of parameters is not accurate enough. In this context, the physical meaning of such parameters as the calculation width,lateral pressure coefficient and frictional coefficient, as well as the soil arching pattern, are analyzed here in detail,and the effect of parameters on the calculation results for soil pressure is presented based on a comparison of different parameters. The analysis shows the calculation width and soil arch pattern have a large impact on soil pressure,and the calculation width and soil arch pattern should be chosen based on measured data, or a wider calculation width and more conservative soil arch pattern should be taken when the scope of construction disturbance is relatively large; it is safer to choose active soil pressure coefficent; the friction angle also has a large impact on soil pressure; and it is recommended that the critical friction angle or half of the critical friction angle should be used to conduct the calculation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTerzaghi soil arching theory   Force applied on tunnel   Calculation width   Soil arching pattern     
Abstract: The Terzaghi soil arching theory has been widely used in force calculations for tunnel structures, howev? er, the theoretical explanation and experimental verification are not sufficient regarding the calculation width, lateral pressure coefficient and frictional coefficient, as well as for the soil arching pattern involved in the Terzaghi formula.Moreover, the technicians are not quite clear about the physical meaning of model parameters, and the selection of parameters is not accurate enough. In this context, the physical meaning of such parameters as the calculation width,lateral pressure coefficient and frictional coefficient, as well as the soil arching pattern, are analyzed here in detail,and the effect of parameters on the calculation results for soil pressure is presented based on a comparison of different parameters. The analysis shows the calculation width and soil arch pattern have a large impact on soil pressure,and the calculation width and soil arch pattern should be chosen based on measured data, or a wider calculation width and more conservative soil arch pattern should be taken when the scope of construction disturbance is relatively large; it is safer to choose active soil pressure coefficent; the friction angle also has a large impact on soil pressure; and it is recommended that the critical friction angle or half of the critical friction angle should be used to conduct the calculation.
KeywordsTerzaghi soil arching theory,   Force applied on tunnel,   Calculation width,   Soil arching pattern     
Cite this article:   
.Problems with the Calculation of Forces Applied to Tunnels Based on the Terzaghi Soil Arching Theory[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(2): 55-60
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I2/55
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY