Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (1) :14-21    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Discussion on Classification Method and Criterion for the Deep-buried and Shallow-buried Rock Tunnels
(1 Logistical Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing 401311;2 China Construction Tunnel Corp. Ltd., Chongqing 401147; 3 Air Force Engineering University, Xi′an 710038; 4 Fujian Minwu Great Wall Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350012)
Download: PDF (2286KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The traditional classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels is based on the Protodya? konov′s pressure arch theory and not reasonable enough due to its limitation of this theory. In view of this the finite element limit analysis method was applied to the classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels, and three principles were put forward. For the rock tunnel with surrounding rock of Ⅳ and Ⅴ, the classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels is based on the failure modes of tunnel, it is defined as the shallow-buried tunnel if the fracture plane cuts through ground surface while it is defined as the deep-buried one if the fracture plane doesn′t cut through ground surface, the height of pressure arch of the shallow-buried tunnel obtained by using FEM strength reduction method can be taken as the dividing line for the shallow-buried and deep-buried tunnels.For the rock tunnel with surrounding rock of higher grade, the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels are defined according to the stability safety factor of the unlined tunnel, it is defined as the deep-buried tunnel when the stability safety factor is more than or equals 1.5 while the failure mode should also be considered to define them when the stability safety factor is less than 1.5. In addition, the division of deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels should still consider the effects of environment, construction, geological structure, unstable block, which will cause the surrounding rock collapse and form loose pressure. At last, it is suggested that for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels it can be calculated by elastic-plastic numerical analysis method, but for the shallow-buried tunnel it should also be analyzed according to the load-structure model to ensure safety.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsDeep-buried tunnel   Shallow-buried tunnel   Classification criterion   Protodyakonov&prime   s pressure arch   FEM strength reduction   Height of shallow-buried pressure arch   Stability safety factor     
Abstract: The traditional classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels is based on the Protodya? konov′s pressure arch theory and not reasonable enough due to its limitation of this theory. In view of this the finite element limit analysis method was applied to the classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels, and three principles were put forward. For the rock tunnel with surrounding rock of Ⅳ and Ⅴ, the classification for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels is based on the failure modes of tunnel, it is defined as the shallow-buried tunnel if the fracture plane cuts through ground surface while it is defined as the deep-buried one if the fracture plane doesn′t cut through ground surface, the height of pressure arch of the shallow-buried tunnel obtained by using FEM strength reduction method can be taken as the dividing line for the shallow-buried and deep-buried tunnels.For the rock tunnel with surrounding rock of higher grade, the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels are defined according to the stability safety factor of the unlined tunnel, it is defined as the deep-buried tunnel when the stability safety factor is more than or equals 1.5 while the failure mode should also be considered to define them when the stability safety factor is less than 1.5. In addition, the division of deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels should still consider the effects of environment, construction, geological structure, unstable block, which will cause the surrounding rock collapse and form loose pressure. At last, it is suggested that for the deep-buried and shallow-buried tunnels it can be calculated by elastic-plastic numerical analysis method, but for the shallow-buried tunnel it should also be analyzed according to the load-structure model to ensure safety.
KeywordsDeep-buried tunnel,   Shallow-buried tunnel,   Classification criterion,   Protodyakonov&prime,   s pressure arch,   FEM strength reduction,   Height of shallow-buried pressure arch,   Stability safety factor     
Cite this article:   
.Discussion on Classification Method and Criterion for the Deep-buried and Shallow-buried Rock Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(1): 14-21
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I1/14
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY