Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2025, Vol. 62 Issue (2) :151-161    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on TBM Jamming Problems in Jurassic and Cretaceous Argillaceous Sandstone Strata in Northern Xinjiang
(1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering,Ministry of Education,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu,610031;2. Xinjiang Shuifa Construction Group Co., Ltd ., Urumqi 830000)
Download: PDF (5231KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to study the TBM jamming issues in the Jurassic and Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone strata in northern Xinjiang, rock mechanical and rheological tests were conducted to obtain relevant physical and mechanical parameters, followed by numerical calculations regarding TBM construction. The results show that the strength, elastic modulus, and internal friction angle of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone are significantly higher than those of Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone, while their Poisson's ratio and cohesion values are similar. Under sustained loading,the strength of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone decreases significantly over time, and the deformation gradually increases. After TBM shutdown, the frictional resistance on the shield shell will experience a process of slow growth,rapid growth, and eventual stabilization. Compared to Jurassic argillaceous sandstone, TBM shutdown in Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone occurs earlier, with the shield-rock contact time and jamming accidents happening sooner.The creep characteristics of Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone are more pronounced than those of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone. After TBM shutdown, the longer the shield shell, the greater the frictional resistance, and the greater the over-excavation, the smaller the frictional resistance. Based on numerical results, the minimum design values for the rated thrust of TBM to prevent jamming and the safe shutdown time under different working conditions are derived.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
DONG Weijie1 ZHANG Siyang1 LI Bochang2 JIANG Yao1 CHEN Xu1 ZHENG Xiangle2 CHEN Sipan2 WU Di1
KeywordsJurassic and cretaceous argillaceous sandstone   Mechanical testing   TBM   Jamming   Numerical calcula? tion     
Abstract: In order to study the TBM jamming issues in the Jurassic and Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone strata in northern Xinjiang, rock mechanical and rheological tests were conducted to obtain relevant physical and mechanical parameters, followed by numerical calculations regarding TBM construction. The results show that the strength, elastic modulus, and internal friction angle of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone are significantly higher than those of Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone, while their Poisson's ratio and cohesion values are similar. Under sustained loading,the strength of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone decreases significantly over time, and the deformation gradually increases. After TBM shutdown, the frictional resistance on the shield shell will experience a process of slow growth,rapid growth, and eventual stabilization. Compared to Jurassic argillaceous sandstone, TBM shutdown in Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone occurs earlier, with the shield-rock contact time and jamming accidents happening sooner.The creep characteristics of Cretaceous argillaceous sandstone are more pronounced than those of Jurassic argillaceous sandstone. After TBM shutdown, the longer the shield shell, the greater the frictional resistance, and the greater the over-excavation, the smaller the frictional resistance. Based on numerical results, the minimum design values for the rated thrust of TBM to prevent jamming and the safe shutdown time under different working conditions are derived.
KeywordsJurassic and cretaceous argillaceous sandstone,   Mechanical testing,   TBM,   Jamming,   Numerical calcula? tion     
Cite this article:   
DONG Weijie1 ZHANG Siyang1 LI Bochang2 JIANG Yao1 CHEN Xu1 ZHENG Xiangle2 CHEN Sipan2 WU Di1 .Study on TBM Jamming Problems in Jurassic and Cretaceous Argillaceous Sandstone Strata in Northern Xinjiang[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,V62(2): 151-161
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2025/V62/I2/151
 
No references of article
[1] JIA Lianhui1 ZHENG Wentao2 LU Yiqiang1 HE Fei1 SHANGGUAN Linjian2 ZHANG Yuxiang1.Force Analysis and Numerical Calculation Platform for Anti Back-sliding Device of TBM in Inclined Shafts[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 79-86
[2] ZHANG Guang1 GONG Qiuming1 XIE Xingfei1 PEI Chengyuan2 SHANG Ceng2.Interval Prediction of TBM Parameters in Stable Excavation Sections Based on Bootstrap-COA-BiGRU Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 121-131
[3] LIU Shaoqiang1 XU Jianshu2 YANG Xiu2 TANG Qisheng1 XIE Xingfei1 GONG Qiuming1 ZHOU Xiaoxiong3.TBM Cutter Edge Tip Wear Phenomenon and Wear Evolution Characteristics[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 20-27
[4] LI Lijun.Analysis of the Impact of Excavation on Ground Settlement and Adjacent Pipeline Deformation Considering Spatial Variability of Soil[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(5): 193-199
[5] HUANG Dengxia1 LUO Yanbin2 ZHAO Zhiqiang2 CHEN Jianxun2 LIU Weiwei2 FENG Rubing1 WU Teligen1.Measurement and Analysis of Dust Concentration in Service Tunnel during Construction of Tianshan Shengli Tunnel with "TBM Method + Drill and Blast Method"[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(4): 77-85
[6] ZHANG Yan HUO Tao ZHANG Zhongwei MA Chunming.TBM Muck Segmentation Method Based on Global Perception and Edge Refinement[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 141-147
[7] LI Jianbin.Advances and Prospects of Tunnel Boring Machine Technology in China[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 178-189
[8] LI Zongping1 WANG Shuaishuai2,4 MAO Jinbo3 LI Yalong3 NIU Xiaoyu2,4.Key Technological Innovation and Application in the Construction of Tianshan Shengli Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(2): 241-253
[9] LIU Xiaoxuan1 TANG Xiao1 ZHANG Shuai1 TAN Zhichao2 WU Dong1.Study on Integrated Multi-objective Optimization of TBM Construction Method Based on the Improved Lightning Search Algorithm[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 156-164
[10] LIU Quanwei1,2 YANG Xing3 YE Shoujie1,2 JIANG Yusheng3 ZHAO Jizeng1,2 TAN Zhuolin4 YANG Zhiyong3.Study on Backfill Grouting Behind the Segment of Double Shield TBM Metro Tunnel Crossing Water-bearing Fault Zone[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 255-261
[11] XIE Miao WANG Haonan LI Siyao TIAN Bo LIU Yafeng ZHANG Hongyu.Study on TBM Tunnelling Parameters Under Ultra-small-radius Turning Conditions Based on Field Data[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 58-66
[12] DUO Shengjun.Study on Ventilation Technology for Long-distance TBM Construction in Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 222-228
[13] LIU Dongxin1 XIAO Yuhang2 ZHOU Xiaoxiong3 GONG Qiuming1 LIU Junhao1.Study on Vibration Characterization Parameters of TBM Rock-breaking Cutterhead[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 153-162
[14] WANG Lichuan1,2 FU Boyi2 ZHANG Huijian2 JI Guodong1 GENG Qi3 WANG Zhengzheng4.Differences in Mechanical Responses of Granite and Limestone when Cut by TBM Disc Cutters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 81-89
[15] YUAN Hongyun1,2 CHEN Liwei2 LIU Zhiqiang2.Method for Comprehensive Evaluation of Longitudinal Crack Defect of Lining of Single-track Railway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 208-216
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY