Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (5) :177-183    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Aseismic Performance-based Optimal Analysis on the Installation Location of Directly Buried Gas Pipeline beyond the Utility Tunnel
(1 Shenzhen Government Investment Project Evaluation Center, Shenzhen 518035; 2 Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) ,Shenzhen 518055)
Download: PDF (2886KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract With the current guiding opinion for ingathering of municipal pipelines into the utility tunnel, the subhigh and high pressure gas pipeline would not be accommodated in utility tunnel. Considering the different position relations between directly buried gas pipeline and utility tunnel, multiple engineering conditions are set and the earthquake dynamic response of directly buried gas pipeline in each condition are calculated by numerical simulation in this research. The calculation results indicate that: (1) the utility tunnel could weaken the earthquake dynamic response of nearby directly buried gas pipeline, in other word, the seismic behavior of gas pipeline buried nearby utility tunnel is better; (2) under the action of earthquake, if the directly buried gas pipeline locates on the right above of utility tunnel, the decreasing extents of earthquake acceleration, displacement and stress are the highest,and the larger the spacing the smaller the amplitude if the gas pipeline locates at two sides of utility tunnel. Thus some suggestions are given to the location of directly buried gas pipeline: (1) if the utility tunnel locates right below the municipal road, the gas pipeline should buried within the central green belt; (2) if the utility tunnel locates un? derneath the non-motorway at two sides of road, the gas pipeline should buried within the green belts at two sides of road.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZENG Gehua1
2
KeywordsUtility tunnel   Directly buried beyond utility tunnel   Gas pipeline   Optimization of location   Aseismic behavior     
Abstract: With the current guiding opinion for ingathering of municipal pipelines into the utility tunnel, the subhigh and high pressure gas pipeline would not be accommodated in utility tunnel. Considering the different position relations between directly buried gas pipeline and utility tunnel, multiple engineering conditions are set and the earthquake dynamic response of directly buried gas pipeline in each condition are calculated by numerical simulation in this research. The calculation results indicate that: (1) the utility tunnel could weaken the earthquake dynamic response of nearby directly buried gas pipeline, in other word, the seismic behavior of gas pipeline buried nearby utility tunnel is better; (2) under the action of earthquake, if the directly buried gas pipeline locates on the right above of utility tunnel, the decreasing extents of earthquake acceleration, displacement and stress are the highest,and the larger the spacing the smaller the amplitude if the gas pipeline locates at two sides of utility tunnel. Thus some suggestions are given to the location of directly buried gas pipeline: (1) if the utility tunnel locates right below the municipal road, the gas pipeline should buried within the central green belt; (2) if the utility tunnel locates un? derneath the non-motorway at two sides of road, the gas pipeline should buried within the green belts at two sides of road.
KeywordsUtility tunnel,   Directly buried beyond utility tunnel,   Gas pipeline,   Optimization of location,   Aseismic behavior     
Cite this article:   
ZENG Gehua1, 2 .Aseismic Performance-based Optimal Analysis on the Installation Location of Directly Buried Gas Pipeline beyond the Utility Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(5): 177-183
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2020/V57/I5/177
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY