Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2020, Vol. 57 Issue (5) :177-183    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Aseismic Performance-based Optimal Analysis on the Installation Location of Directly Buried Gas Pipeline beyond the Utility Tunnel
(1 Shenzhen Government Investment Project Evaluation Center, Shenzhen 518035; 2 Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) ,Shenzhen 518055)
Download: PDF (2886KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract With the current guiding opinion for ingathering of municipal pipelines into the utility tunnel, the subhigh and high pressure gas pipeline would not be accommodated in utility tunnel. Considering the different position relations between directly buried gas pipeline and utility tunnel, multiple engineering conditions are set and the earthquake dynamic response of directly buried gas pipeline in each condition are calculated by numerical simulation in this research. The calculation results indicate that: (1) the utility tunnel could weaken the earthquake dynamic response of nearby directly buried gas pipeline, in other word, the seismic behavior of gas pipeline buried nearby utility tunnel is better; (2) under the action of earthquake, if the directly buried gas pipeline locates on the right above of utility tunnel, the decreasing extents of earthquake acceleration, displacement and stress are the highest,and the larger the spacing the smaller the amplitude if the gas pipeline locates at two sides of utility tunnel. Thus some suggestions are given to the location of directly buried gas pipeline: (1) if the utility tunnel locates right below the municipal road, the gas pipeline should buried within the central green belt; (2) if the utility tunnel locates un? derneath the non-motorway at two sides of road, the gas pipeline should buried within the green belts at two sides of road.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZENG Gehua1
2
KeywordsUtility tunnel   Directly buried beyond utility tunnel   Gas pipeline   Optimization of location   Aseismic behavior     
Abstract: With the current guiding opinion for ingathering of municipal pipelines into the utility tunnel, the subhigh and high pressure gas pipeline would not be accommodated in utility tunnel. Considering the different position relations between directly buried gas pipeline and utility tunnel, multiple engineering conditions are set and the earthquake dynamic response of directly buried gas pipeline in each condition are calculated by numerical simulation in this research. The calculation results indicate that: (1) the utility tunnel could weaken the earthquake dynamic response of nearby directly buried gas pipeline, in other word, the seismic behavior of gas pipeline buried nearby utility tunnel is better; (2) under the action of earthquake, if the directly buried gas pipeline locates on the right above of utility tunnel, the decreasing extents of earthquake acceleration, displacement and stress are the highest,and the larger the spacing the smaller the amplitude if the gas pipeline locates at two sides of utility tunnel. Thus some suggestions are given to the location of directly buried gas pipeline: (1) if the utility tunnel locates right below the municipal road, the gas pipeline should buried within the central green belt; (2) if the utility tunnel locates un? derneath the non-motorway at two sides of road, the gas pipeline should buried within the green belts at two sides of road.
KeywordsUtility tunnel,   Directly buried beyond utility tunnel,   Gas pipeline,   Optimization of location,   Aseismic behavior     
Cite this article:   
ZENG Gehua1, 2 .Aseismic Performance-based Optimal Analysis on the Installation Location of Directly Buried Gas Pipeline beyond the Utility Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,V57(5): 177-183
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2020/V57/I5/177
 
No references of article
[1] YAN Jian1,2 WEI Yanqing3 HE Chuan1 ZHOU Zihan1 GOU Hao1.Hot-freeze Link Technology and Its Application in Snow Melting and Deicing of Tunnel Portal Section of Sichuan-Tibet Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 1-9
[2] YAN Xidong1 GAO Jun1 HAN Fei2 LI Zheng1.Risk Evaluation of the Tunnel Passing through Active Fault Zone and Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 10-22
[3] WANG Shuaishuai1,2 CHEN Guizhou2 GUO Chun2 BAI Yonghou3.On Power Performances of Tunnel Construction Machinery at High-altitude Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 23-29
[4] GONG Chenjie1 YANG Junsheng1 FU Jinyang1, 2.Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Segment Cracking of LargeDiameter River-Crossing Shield Tunnelling in Composite Rock Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 30-42
[5] ZHANG Xin.Research on Application of Random Source Model Based New Microtremor Survey Technology to Shield Tunnelling in Upper Soft and Lower Hard Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 43-50
[6] HUANG Zhongkai1 ZHANG Dongmei1,2.Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of the Shallow-buried Shield Tunnel in Soft Soil Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 51-60
[7] JIANG Heng1 LIU Xuezeng2 ZHU Hehua1.Research on Crack Identification of Highway Tunnel Linings Based on Data Obtained from the Testing Vehicle[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 61-65
[8] TIAN Chongming1 YE Fei1 SONG Guifeng2 WANG Qinglong2 ZHAO Meng1.On Mechanism of Crystal Blockage of Tunnel Drainage System and Preventive Countermeasures[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 66-76
[9] LIU Sicong1 ZHAO Chengqiao2 MA Chenxiao1 PENG Fangle.Discussion on Connection Problems of Underground Space in Early CBD from the Perspective of Urban Renewal ——A Case of Lujiazui CBD[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 77-83
[10] WANG Zhilong1,2 ZHOU Renqiang3 YANG Nie1,2 WANG Mingnian1,2 LIU Dagang1,2.Hoek-Brown Criterion Based Calculation Method of Rock Resistant Coefficient in Tunnelling and Its Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 84-90
[11] SUN Yulong YAN Zhiguo.Study on Computation of Surrounding Rock Pressure of Super Large Span and Flat Underground Cavern Based on Process Load Concept[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 91-98
[12] ZHOU Zhong CHEN Yun MIAO Linwu. Study of Equivalent Layered Method Based Prediction Model for Deformations Caused by Construction of New Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 99-103
[13] LV Xilin1,2 ZHAO Yucheng1,2 CAI Jiantao3.Numerical Simulation of Ground Subsidence Induced by Shield Tunnel Construction Disturbance in Water-rich Sandy Stratum[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 104-109
[14] CHEN Weijie1 SU Dong1,2 CHEN Xiangsheng1,2 PANG Xiaochao2,3 LEI Guoping1,2.Study on the Influence of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction and Lateral Pressure on Deformation of the Shield Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 110-115
[15] LV Jingfu1 DU Jiangmei1 LUO Zejun2,3 ZHANG Jinjiang1 MIU Yabiao1.Research on the Stability and Supporting Parameters of High-Steep Slope of Yankou Highway Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 116-124
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY