Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (4) :12-20    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Factors Affecting the Stability of Double-Layer Superimposed Lining#br# in Deep-Buried Tunnels under the Action of High Water Pressure #br#
(China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308)
Download: PDF (3475KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract With the gradual increase in awareness of ecological resources protection, the waterproofing type of tun? nels under high water pressure has also been gradually shifting from the "mainly draining" to "fully waterproofing",so resulting in difficulties in mass concrete construction. In view of this, the "double-layer superimposed lining" solution is proposed to reduce the thickness of the structure by "splitting", which can effectively mitigate harmful deformations caused by the cement hydration heat in the structure, and enhance the implementability and operability of mass concrete structure construction, while also improve the quality and effectiveness of tunnel waterproofing.Taking the sea-crossing tunnel section of the Qingdao Metro Line 1 as the engineering background, this paper conducts research of the factors affecting the stability of double-layer superimposed lining by the finite element analysis software ANSYS, and the conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) due to the waterproofing layer between linings, only the radial compression stiffness of the spring can be considered in terms of contact mechanics behaviors of the lining bonding surface, while ignoring the impact of tangential shear stiffness of the spring; 2) when the radial spring stiffness of the bonding surface is of equal order of magnitude to the elastic modulus of the structure at both sides, the safety coefficient curve basically tends to converge, and the structural failure sequences are in the order of the inner lining inverted arch, inner lining arch foot, outer lining inverted arch, outer lining arch foot, inner lining arch vault,outer lining arch vault; 3) the higher the subgrade reaction coefficient of the surrounding rock is, the greater the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure will be, and so attention should be paid to improving the subgrade reaction coefficient of poor surrounding rocks and maintaining that of good surrounding rocks during the design and construction process; 4) the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure increases with the increase of the stiffness of each lining layer, and the inner lining structure has the effect of increasing and improving the safety of the outer lining structure.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Wenjuan GAO Xin
KeywordsHigh water pressure   Superimposed lining   Spring stiffness   Subgrade reaction coefficient   Concrete strength grade   Safety coefficient     
Abstract: With the gradual increase in awareness of ecological resources protection, the waterproofing type of tun? nels under high water pressure has also been gradually shifting from the "mainly draining" to "fully waterproofing",so resulting in difficulties in mass concrete construction. In view of this, the "double-layer superimposed lining" solution is proposed to reduce the thickness of the structure by "splitting", which can effectively mitigate harmful deformations caused by the cement hydration heat in the structure, and enhance the implementability and operability of mass concrete structure construction, while also improve the quality and effectiveness of tunnel waterproofing.Taking the sea-crossing tunnel section of the Qingdao Metro Line 1 as the engineering background, this paper conducts research of the factors affecting the stability of double-layer superimposed lining by the finite element analysis software ANSYS, and the conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) due to the waterproofing layer between linings, only the radial compression stiffness of the spring can be considered in terms of contact mechanics behaviors of the lining bonding surface, while ignoring the impact of tangential shear stiffness of the spring; 2) when the radial spring stiffness of the bonding surface is of equal order of magnitude to the elastic modulus of the structure at both sides, the safety coefficient curve basically tends to converge, and the structural failure sequences are in the order of the inner lining inverted arch, inner lining arch foot, outer lining inverted arch, outer lining arch foot, inner lining arch vault,outer lining arch vault; 3) the higher the subgrade reaction coefficient of the surrounding rock is, the greater the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure will be, and so attention should be paid to improving the subgrade reaction coefficient of poor surrounding rocks and maintaining that of good surrounding rocks during the design and construction process; 4) the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure increases with the increase of the stiffness of each lining layer, and the inner lining structure has the effect of increasing and improving the safety of the outer lining structure.
KeywordsHigh water pressure,   Superimposed lining,   Spring stiffness,   Subgrade reaction coefficient,   Concrete strength grade,   Safety coefficient     
Cite this article:   
WANG Wenjuan GAO Xin .Study on Factors Affecting the Stability of Double-Layer Superimposed Lining#br# in Deep-Buried Tunnels under the Action of High Water Pressure #br#[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(4): 12-20
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2021/V58/I4/12
 
No references of article
[1] WANG Zhijie1 LI Jinyi1 JIANG Xinzheng1 LI Zhen1 ZENG Qing2 WANG Ning2.Research on the Impact Zoning and Construction Countermeasures for Bilateral Adjacent Tunnels with Shallow Depth and Unsymmetrical Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 1-11
[2] U Li1,2 SUN Yuan1,2 WANG Mingnian1,2.Research on the Calculation Method for Frost-Resistance Fortification Lengths of Tunnels in Cold Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 21-28
[3] QIN Shangyou1 CHEN Jiayao2 ZHANG Dongming2 YANG Tongjun1 HUANG Hongwei2 ZHAO Shuai2.Automatic Identification of Rock Structure at Tunnel Working Face Based on Deep Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 29-36
[4] LI Pengju1 ZHENG Fangkun2 LV Jianbing3 WU Weijun3 LIU Feng3 CHEN Gongfa3.Automatic Identification Technique for Siltation and Blockage Conditions in Drainage Pipes in Limestone Areas Based on Big Data and Transfer Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 37-47
[5] SONG Fubin1 YANG Jie1 CHENG Lin1 LV Gao1,2 SONG Yang1.Application of GPR Forward Modeling in the Identification of Tunnel Lining Defects[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 48-56
[6] ZHAI Qiang GU Weihong JIN Zhaoqin.Safety Risk Assessment for a Subway Connecting Passage Constructed by Freezing Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 57-66
[7] YE Fei1 HE Biao1 TIAN Chongming1 WANG Siyu1 WANG Jian1 SONG Guifeng2.Research Progresses on Triethanolamine Early-Strength Agents and Its Application Prospects in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 67-78
[8] XIE Jun1,2 NI Yajing2 HU Yingfei2 BAO Shuxian2 LI Yantao1.Research Progress on the Model Box for Shaking Table Tests[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 79-85
[9] HUI Qiang1 ZHANG Jun2 JIANG Haibo1.Study on the Characteristics and Distribution Laws of Plastic Zone Induced by Deep-buried High-geostress Hydraulic Tunnelling in Jointed Rock Mass[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 86-94
[10] ZHANG Lili1 LANG Songjun1 DENG Lin2 ZANG Cheng3.Study on the Triaxial Compression Mechanical Properties and Damage Constitutive Model of Tunnel Sandstone in Seasonal Frozen Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 95-103
[11] LI Xinxi1 YU Haitao2 LI Chunyuan3 YU Xiaodong4 XU Lei5.3D Large-scale Seismic Response Analysis of Bored Section of an Immersed Tunnel Project[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 104-108
[12] FENG Yi.Two-Stage Safety Analysis of Overlapped Shield Tunnels Based on Dynamic Loads[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 109-116
[13] WANG Bo1 ZHENG Pengfei1 HU Jiangyang1 LIU Junyong1 LIU Shuo2.Numerical Simulation of Construction Process and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Parallel Shield Tunnelling with Close Distance[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 117-124
[14] ZHANG Hong1,2 LIU Haiyang1,3.Research on the Impact of Subway Shield Tunnelling on the Stability of Overcrossing Underpass Foundation Pit[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 125-132
[15] YAN Haojie ZHENG Junjie PAN Yu CHEN Pengfei.Time-Space Effect of Pile Foundation Responses Induced by Adjacent Shield Tunnel Excavation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(4): 133-140
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY