Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (4) :12-20    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on Factors Affecting the Stability of Double-Layer Superimposed Lining#br# in Deep-Buried Tunnels under the Action of High Water Pressure #br#
(China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308)
Download: PDF (3475KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract With the gradual increase in awareness of ecological resources protection, the waterproofing type of tun? nels under high water pressure has also been gradually shifting from the "mainly draining" to "fully waterproofing",so resulting in difficulties in mass concrete construction. In view of this, the "double-layer superimposed lining" solution is proposed to reduce the thickness of the structure by "splitting", which can effectively mitigate harmful deformations caused by the cement hydration heat in the structure, and enhance the implementability and operability of mass concrete structure construction, while also improve the quality and effectiveness of tunnel waterproofing.Taking the sea-crossing tunnel section of the Qingdao Metro Line 1 as the engineering background, this paper conducts research of the factors affecting the stability of double-layer superimposed lining by the finite element analysis software ANSYS, and the conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) due to the waterproofing layer between linings, only the radial compression stiffness of the spring can be considered in terms of contact mechanics behaviors of the lining bonding surface, while ignoring the impact of tangential shear stiffness of the spring; 2) when the radial spring stiffness of the bonding surface is of equal order of magnitude to the elastic modulus of the structure at both sides, the safety coefficient curve basically tends to converge, and the structural failure sequences are in the order of the inner lining inverted arch, inner lining arch foot, outer lining inverted arch, outer lining arch foot, inner lining arch vault,outer lining arch vault; 3) the higher the subgrade reaction coefficient of the surrounding rock is, the greater the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure will be, and so attention should be paid to improving the subgrade reaction coefficient of poor surrounding rocks and maintaining that of good surrounding rocks during the design and construction process; 4) the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure increases with the increase of the stiffness of each lining layer, and the inner lining structure has the effect of increasing and improving the safety of the outer lining structure.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Wenjuan GAO Xin
KeywordsHigh water pressure   Superimposed lining   Spring stiffness   Subgrade reaction coefficient   Concrete strength grade   Safety coefficient     
Abstract: With the gradual increase in awareness of ecological resources protection, the waterproofing type of tun? nels under high water pressure has also been gradually shifting from the "mainly draining" to "fully waterproofing",so resulting in difficulties in mass concrete construction. In view of this, the "double-layer superimposed lining" solution is proposed to reduce the thickness of the structure by "splitting", which can effectively mitigate harmful deformations caused by the cement hydration heat in the structure, and enhance the implementability and operability of mass concrete structure construction, while also improve the quality and effectiveness of tunnel waterproofing.Taking the sea-crossing tunnel section of the Qingdao Metro Line 1 as the engineering background, this paper conducts research of the factors affecting the stability of double-layer superimposed lining by the finite element analysis software ANSYS, and the conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) due to the waterproofing layer between linings, only the radial compression stiffness of the spring can be considered in terms of contact mechanics behaviors of the lining bonding surface, while ignoring the impact of tangential shear stiffness of the spring; 2) when the radial spring stiffness of the bonding surface is of equal order of magnitude to the elastic modulus of the structure at both sides, the safety coefficient curve basically tends to converge, and the structural failure sequences are in the order of the inner lining inverted arch, inner lining arch foot, outer lining inverted arch, outer lining arch foot, inner lining arch vault,outer lining arch vault; 3) the higher the subgrade reaction coefficient of the surrounding rock is, the greater the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure will be, and so attention should be paid to improving the subgrade reaction coefficient of poor surrounding rocks and maintaining that of good surrounding rocks during the design and construction process; 4) the safety coefficient of the superimposed structure increases with the increase of the stiffness of each lining layer, and the inner lining structure has the effect of increasing and improving the safety of the outer lining structure.
KeywordsHigh water pressure,   Superimposed lining,   Spring stiffness,   Subgrade reaction coefficient,   Concrete strength grade,   Safety coefficient     
Cite this article:   
WANG Wenjuan GAO Xin .Study on Factors Affecting the Stability of Double-Layer Superimposed Lining#br# in Deep-Buried Tunnels under the Action of High Water Pressure #br#[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(4): 12-20
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2021/V58/I4/12
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] YANG Shaoyu1 WANG Xiaotian2 ZHANG Peiyuan1 LIU Shengchen1 LI Shuchen2 LI Luoning2.A Review of Spray-applied Waterproofing Membrane Technology for Drill-and-Blast Tunnels [J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 1-14
[4] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[5] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[6] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[7] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[8] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[9] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[10] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[11] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[12] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[13] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[14] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[15] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY