Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2021, Vol. 58 Issue (5) :37-45    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
tudy on the Control Measures against Ground Settlement Induced by Shield Tunnel Construction underneath Railway Throat in Sandy Cobble Stratum
(Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (3426KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Sandy cobble stratum has little cohesion and poor self-stability capacity, and is very prone to collapse during tunnel construction, making it difficult to control the ground surface settlement. In order to study the ground surface settlement pattern and relevant control measures when a shield is driving under sensitive areas in sandy cobble stratum, this paper uses the Chengdu Metro Line 5, which passes under the throat area of Baocheng Railway, as the engineering context for the study. Through comparison of construction methods, numerical simulation and feedback from site monitoring, this paper proposes the control measures for and elucidates the pattern of the ground settlement, and verifies the effectiveness of the settlement control measures. The study results show that it is reasonable and effective to use the reinforcement measures such as the double-layered large pipe roof in combination with the ground tracing grouting method to control the ground settlement during the shield construction in sandy cobble stratum; calculations show that the ground surface settlement is reduced by 61.16% after consolidation of the strata compared to that without consolidation; using fully automatic monitoring system for real-time feedback and early warning of ground settlement, the monitoring data show that the maximum ground settlement during construction is 1.29 mm and the maximum heaving is 0.72 mm, which verifies the effectiveness of the ground reinforcement measures and ensures the safety of shield tunnelling and railway operation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
QIU Wenge WAN Shifu GAO Ganggang ZHAO Hailin QI Xingxin
KeywordsShield tunnel   Sandy cobble stratum   Stratum reinforcement   Big pipe roof   Tracing grouting   Numeri? cal simulation   Ground settlement   Field monitoring     
Abstract: Sandy cobble stratum has little cohesion and poor self-stability capacity, and is very prone to collapse during tunnel construction, making it difficult to control the ground surface settlement. In order to study the ground surface settlement pattern and relevant control measures when a shield is driving under sensitive areas in sandy cobble stratum, this paper uses the Chengdu Metro Line 5, which passes under the throat area of Baocheng Railway, as the engineering context for the study. Through comparison of construction methods, numerical simulation and feedback from site monitoring, this paper proposes the control measures for and elucidates the pattern of the ground settlement, and verifies the effectiveness of the settlement control measures. The study results show that it is reasonable and effective to use the reinforcement measures such as the double-layered large pipe roof in combination with the ground tracing grouting method to control the ground settlement during the shield construction in sandy cobble stratum; calculations show that the ground surface settlement is reduced by 61.16% after consolidation of the strata compared to that without consolidation; using fully automatic monitoring system for real-time feedback and early warning of ground settlement, the monitoring data show that the maximum ground settlement during construction is 1.29 mm and the maximum heaving is 0.72 mm, which verifies the effectiveness of the ground reinforcement measures and ensures the safety of shield tunnelling and railway operation.
KeywordsShield tunnel,   Sandy cobble stratum,   Stratum reinforcement,   Big pipe roof,   Tracing grouting,   Numeri? cal simulation,   Ground settlement,   Field monitoring     
Cite this article:   
QIU Wenge WAN Shifu GAO Ganggang ZHAO Hailin QI Xingxin .tudy on the Control Measures against Ground Settlement Induced by Shield Tunnel Construction underneath Railway Throat in Sandy Cobble Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,V58(5): 37-45
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2021/V58/I5/37
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY