Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2023, Vol. 60 Issue (6) :139-150    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Tunnel Portal Section Crown Settlement SVR Prediction Models Based on Different Optimization Algorithms and Their Comparative Evaluation
(1. School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064; 2.Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Highway Bridges and Tunnels,Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064)
Download: PDF (6598KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Precise prediction of settlement and deformation at tunnel portal section is a priority in ensuring safe en? try into tunnel, and it is of great importance to solve the problem of high dimensionality of input layer and accurately describe the performance of machine learning prediction model. Therefore, the principal component analysis (PCA),optimization algorithm and support vector regressor (SVR) are combined to generate 6 combination prediction models based on PCA, optimization algorithm and SVR. First, the main factors that affect crown settlement are identified by using PCA. Next, the optimization algorithms including genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) are used to optimize the penalty factors and kernel parameters of SVR. At last, the combination prediction model is applied to the Shibitou Tunnel in Wenzhou, the comparative evaluation of the performance of the prediction model is conducted by using the correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error(RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), and the model query table is generated. The results indicate: the combination prediction models have high precision, with R≥0.987 0, RMSE≤6.792 4 mm and MAE≤3.493 7 mm. After dimensionality reduction by PCA, the GA optimization allows SVR prediction model to increase its prediction efficiency by 65%, while PSO and GWO optimization allows SVR prediction model to decrease the dimensionality of its input layer but increase its k value, which reduces the prediction efficiency, particularly so in the case of PCA-GWO-SVR. PCA-PSO-SVR prediction model has a better robustness.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Shichao1
2 WANG Yaqiong1
2 GAO Qidong1
2 ZHOU Haixiao1
2 WANG Zhifeng1
2 REN Rui1
2
KeywordsTunnel engineering   Portal section   Crown settlement   SVR optimization model   Overfitting     
Abstract: Precise prediction of settlement and deformation at tunnel portal section is a priority in ensuring safe en? try into tunnel, and it is of great importance to solve the problem of high dimensionality of input layer and accurately describe the performance of machine learning prediction model. Therefore, the principal component analysis (PCA),optimization algorithm and support vector regressor (SVR) are combined to generate 6 combination prediction models based on PCA, optimization algorithm and SVR. First, the main factors that affect crown settlement are identified by using PCA. Next, the optimization algorithms including genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) are used to optimize the penalty factors and kernel parameters of SVR. At last, the combination prediction model is applied to the Shibitou Tunnel in Wenzhou, the comparative evaluation of the performance of the prediction model is conducted by using the correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error(RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), and the model query table is generated. The results indicate: the combination prediction models have high precision, with R≥0.987 0, RMSE≤6.792 4 mm and MAE≤3.493 7 mm. After dimensionality reduction by PCA, the GA optimization allows SVR prediction model to increase its prediction efficiency by 65%, while PSO and GWO optimization allows SVR prediction model to decrease the dimensionality of its input layer but increase its k value, which reduces the prediction efficiency, particularly so in the case of PCA-GWO-SVR. PCA-PSO-SVR prediction model has a better robustness.
KeywordsTunnel engineering,   Portal section,   Crown settlement,   SVR optimization model,   Overfitting     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Shichao1, 2 WANG Yaqiong1, 2 GAO Qidong1 etc .Tunnel Portal Section Crown Settlement SVR Prediction Models Based on Different Optimization Algorithms and Their Comparative Evaluation[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,V60(6): 139-150
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2023/V60/I6/139
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Shihao1 SONG Zhanping1,2,3 XU Leilei4 XIA Zhenzhao5 WANG Junbao1,2,3.Optimization of Method Statement for Low-carbon Tunnel Construction Based on SVM-MAUT[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 68-79
[2] ZHU Yujie LI Peinan LIU Yuqing ZHANG Ziyao.Study on CO2 Adsorption Performance of Nitrogen-doped Mesoporous Carbon and Its Engineering Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 91-99
[3] SHEN Yusheng1,2 ZHAO Helin1 ZHU Zhengchao1 YI Penghao1 LEI Long3 SU Wei3.Improved Integral Response Displacement Method for Shallow-buried Tunnel Portal Section in Highly Seismic Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 78-87
[4] WENG Yuan1 LI Aichun1 ZHAO Ting1 LIU Buwu2.Research on Factors Influencing the Resilience of the Tunnel System and Related Evaluation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 40-47
[5] LUO Chao1 LI Zeyu1 LIU Rufei1 LI Yanyan1 LI Ming2.Monitoring Method for Multi-phase Crown Deformation of Highway Tunnels Based on Fixed-station Laser Scanning Data[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 158-166
[6] WANG Jianyu.For the Harmony between Tunnelling and Geological Body ——Discussion on Focused Hot Issues in Conventional Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 1-5
[7] ZHENG Kunlong1,2 WANG Jianyun2 LINGHU Yan1 YANG Xiaohua3 DING Yate1 CHEN Kun1 WANG Zhifeng3.Experimental Study on Prevention and Treatment of Tunnel Leakage with Rapid Setting Permeable Crystallographic Grouts[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 254-263
[8] LI Wei1 JIANG Yajun2 LIU Shijun2 WANG Cuijuan3 XIAO Huarong4 CUI Hengtao2.Study on the Growth Mechanism of Calcium Carbonate Crystal of Karst Water on the Tunnel Concrete Substrate[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 246-253
[9] JI Yunpeng1,2 FANG Lingguo3 TANG Haotian4 ZHANG Xingli1,2 WANG Xiangjin1,2 BAI Yuntian1,2.Study on Forces on Pipe Umbrella Support in the Whole Process of Tunnel Excavation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 123-138
[10] WANG Xiuling1,2.Model Experimental Study on Interaction Characteristics of Rock and Structure in Weak Rock Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 164-174
[11] ZHOU Baochun1,2.SUMO-based Simulation and Evaluation of Traffic Organization Scheme for Yuelongmen Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 274-281
[12] SUN Yi.Analysis of Stress Characteristics and Stability of Initial Support Arch of Tunnels with the Spatial Effect of Truss Structure Taken into Consideration[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(3): 34-43
[13] JIANG Yajun1 ZHENG Yi1 YU Liangmin1 CUI Hengtao1 CAO Danyang2.Effect of Glass Dust on the Resistance of Concrete to Calcium Corrosion under Contact Corrosion Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 223-229
[14] SUN Huibin1 ZHANG Jianli2 YANG Huixiang1 YANG Hui2 WANG Lei3 WEI Jun2 LIN Weinan3.A Study on the Bearing Characteristics of Composite Concrete-filled Steel Tube Support Structure in Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 103-114
[15] YAN Bo1 ZHANG Junru2 ZHANG Xinjin1 PENG Lei1 Ning Bo1.A Study on the Stability of Surrounding Rocks in Construction of Undercrossing Tunnels with Super-large Section Based on Radial Displacement Release Rate of Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(2): 115-124
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY