Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :35-44    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on the Partitioning Method for Prefabricated Secondary Lining in Conventional Tunnelling Based on the "Contact Friction-Beam-Joint" Model
(School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (4989KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to analyze the partitioning method and load-bearing characteristics of the prefabricated secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling, the "contact friction-beam-joint" composite lining calculation model that takes account of the interaction between linings has been created by using the load-structure model analysis method. With consideration of the normal and tangential constraints on the initial support imposed by the surrounding rock, the contact pressure between the initial support and secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling and the internal force of secondary lining have been analyzed. The 6 partitioning methods for prefabricated secondary lining, and the effects of the position of prefabricated block joints and the flexural rigidity of joints on the internal force of secondary lining are also investigated here. As the study results indicate: contact rigidity has major impact on the inter-layer contact pressure, and the maximum contact pressure always occurs at the arch springing of tunnel lining, so it is recommended that the contact rigidity coefficient is selected within the stable range of the contact pressure. The position of prefabricated block joints of secondary lining has major impact on the bending moment of secondary lining but minor impact on its axial force. If the flexural rigidity of joints is in the range of 0~100 MN·m·rad-1, the joints impose the greatest impact on the contact pressure, internal force and deformation of the lining, so it is recommended that the flexural rigidity value of the joints of prefabricated secondary lining is kept in the range of 50~400 MN·m·rad-1.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Yujin ZHOU Xiaojun YU Bingxin LI Xu ZHANG Chao
KeywordsConventional Tunnelling   Composite lining   Prefabricated secondary lining   Flexural rigidity   "Contact friction-beam-joint"   model     
Abstract: In order to analyze the partitioning method and load-bearing characteristics of the prefabricated secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling, the "contact friction-beam-joint" composite lining calculation model that takes account of the interaction between linings has been created by using the load-structure model analysis method. With consideration of the normal and tangential constraints on the initial support imposed by the surrounding rock, the contact pressure between the initial support and secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling and the internal force of secondary lining have been analyzed. The 6 partitioning methods for prefabricated secondary lining, and the effects of the position of prefabricated block joints and the flexural rigidity of joints on the internal force of secondary lining are also investigated here. As the study results indicate: contact rigidity has major impact on the inter-layer contact pressure, and the maximum contact pressure always occurs at the arch springing of tunnel lining, so it is recommended that the contact rigidity coefficient is selected within the stable range of the contact pressure. The position of prefabricated block joints of secondary lining has major impact on the bending moment of secondary lining but minor impact on its axial force. If the flexural rigidity of joints is in the range of 0~100 MN·m·rad-1, the joints impose the greatest impact on the contact pressure, internal force and deformation of the lining, so it is recommended that the flexural rigidity value of the joints of prefabricated secondary lining is kept in the range of 50~400 MN·m·rad-1.
KeywordsConventional Tunnelling,   Composite lining,   Prefabricated secondary lining,   Flexural rigidity,   "Contact friction-beam-joint",   model     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yujin ZHOU Xiaojun YU Bingxin LI Xu ZHANG Chao .Study on the Partitioning Method for Prefabricated Secondary Lining in Conventional Tunnelling Based on the "Contact Friction-Beam-Joint" Model[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 35-44
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I3/35
 
No references of article
[1] CHEN Youjian.Visualization Simulation and Early Warning System for Shield Tunnelling Based on Digital Geological Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 166-174
[2] PAN Tong1 ZHANG Junru1 DAI Yi1 CHEN Pengtao1 MA Kaimeng1,2.Variation Pattern of Surrounding Rock Bearing Arch of Deep Tunnel and Analysis on Its Impact[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 72-84
[3] CHEN Zeen1,2 CHEN Xiaofeng1,2,3 KONG Xiangmiao4 ZHANG Xin5 ZHANG Yongqiang2.Study on the Flow Characteristics and Local Loss Characteristics of the Confluence Segment of Bifurcate Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 53-60
[4] QU Hao1 ZHANG Bo1,2 ZHANG Zhenyi3 ZHANG Liyao4.Case Study on Deformation Damage of Masonry Building Caused by Lateral Crossing of Shield Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 119-130
[5] WANG Chengzhen1 DING Wantao2,3 YU Wenduan1 WANG Zhicheng1 SUN Tengyun1 WANG Zhongrong2.Development and Application of Slurry Flow Model for Slurry Shield Tunnelling Based on BP Modified Rheological Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 194-201
[6] LIU Hongzhi1 XU Shankun1 GUO Yidong2,3 FANG Yingran2,3 LI Xinggao2,3.Analysis of the Effect of Slurry Rheological Model on the Pressure Loss Characteristics of Slurry Discharge Pipe of Slurry Shield[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 182-189
[7] ZENG Yi1 GAO Yue2,3 WU Peilin2,3 ZHANG Xiaolong1 FU Yanbin2,3.Study on Model Test of Existing Shield Tunnel Uplift[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 200-207
[8] LI Jiahao1 XI Mingxing2 SHEN Yi1 LIU An2 ZHU Hehua1.Calculation and Composition Assessment of the Carbon Emission in the Construction Phase of Highway Tunnels Based on SimaPro[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 20-28
[9] Zhang Xiaoying1 Liu Tao2 Shen Yi2 Liu An3.Analysis of the Effect of Lighting on Carbon Emission in the Full Life Cycle of Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 40-47
[10] LI Kejin1,4 QI Yuejun2 WANG You3 QIU Hui1 ZHANG Xi1 WU Guangxing2.Analysis of Horizontal Displacement of Single Pile Induced by Lateral Penetration of Tunnel Based on the Pasternak Shear Layer Theory[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 111-119
[11] ZHANG Shichao1,2 WANG Yaqiong1,2 GAO Qidong1,2 ZHOU Haixiao1,2 WANG Zhifeng1,2 REN Rui1,2.Tunnel Portal Section Crown Settlement SVR Prediction Models Based on Different Optimization Algorithms and Their Comparative Evaluation[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 139-150
[12] YANG Zhao1,2 GAO Ruchao1,2 JI Fuquan1,2 CHEN Peishuai1,2 LI Mingpeng3.High-precision Measurement of Joint between Shield Tunnel Segments Based on SegFormer Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 175-182
[13] MA Yalina1,2 CHEN Yaqi1,2 LIU Jiguo1,2 CUI Zhen3 ZHOU Guangxin4.Research on Failure Mechanism of Tunnel with Articulated Lining Crossing Strike-slip Fault[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(5): 136-147
[14] ZHENG Xiaoyue1,3 SHI Chenghua1,2,3 WANG Zuxian1,3 YU Guoliang4 ZHENG Keyue1,3.Calculation Method for Safe Thickness of Water Insulation Rock in Tunnelling Based on Timoshenko Beam Theory[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 14-22
[15] WU Gang1 LUO Wei2, 3 WANG Xiaolong1 ZHU Jingjing1 JIA Fei2, 3 XUE Yadong2, 3.Study on a Deep Learning-based Model for Detecting Apparent Defects in Shield Tunnel Lining[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 67-75
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY