Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (3) :35-44    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on the Partitioning Method for Prefabricated Secondary Lining in Conventional Tunnelling Based on the "Contact Friction-Beam-Joint" Model
(School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031)
Download: PDF (4989KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to analyze the partitioning method and load-bearing characteristics of the prefabricated secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling, the "contact friction-beam-joint" composite lining calculation model that takes account of the interaction between linings has been created by using the load-structure model analysis method. With consideration of the normal and tangential constraints on the initial support imposed by the surrounding rock, the contact pressure between the initial support and secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling and the internal force of secondary lining have been analyzed. The 6 partitioning methods for prefabricated secondary lining, and the effects of the position of prefabricated block joints and the flexural rigidity of joints on the internal force of secondary lining are also investigated here. As the study results indicate: contact rigidity has major impact on the inter-layer contact pressure, and the maximum contact pressure always occurs at the arch springing of tunnel lining, so it is recommended that the contact rigidity coefficient is selected within the stable range of the contact pressure. The position of prefabricated block joints of secondary lining has major impact on the bending moment of secondary lining but minor impact on its axial force. If the flexural rigidity of joints is in the range of 0~100 MN·m·rad-1, the joints impose the greatest impact on the contact pressure, internal force and deformation of the lining, so it is recommended that the flexural rigidity value of the joints of prefabricated secondary lining is kept in the range of 50~400 MN·m·rad-1.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Yujin ZHOU Xiaojun YU Bingxin LI Xu ZHANG Chao
KeywordsConventional Tunnelling   Composite lining   Prefabricated secondary lining   Flexural rigidity   "Contact friction-beam-joint"   model     
Abstract: In order to analyze the partitioning method and load-bearing characteristics of the prefabricated secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling, the "contact friction-beam-joint" composite lining calculation model that takes account of the interaction between linings has been created by using the load-structure model analysis method. With consideration of the normal and tangential constraints on the initial support imposed by the surrounding rock, the contact pressure between the initial support and secondary lining in the composite lining of conventional tunnelling and the internal force of secondary lining have been analyzed. The 6 partitioning methods for prefabricated secondary lining, and the effects of the position of prefabricated block joints and the flexural rigidity of joints on the internal force of secondary lining are also investigated here. As the study results indicate: contact rigidity has major impact on the inter-layer contact pressure, and the maximum contact pressure always occurs at the arch springing of tunnel lining, so it is recommended that the contact rigidity coefficient is selected within the stable range of the contact pressure. The position of prefabricated block joints of secondary lining has major impact on the bending moment of secondary lining but minor impact on its axial force. If the flexural rigidity of joints is in the range of 0~100 MN·m·rad-1, the joints impose the greatest impact on the contact pressure, internal force and deformation of the lining, so it is recommended that the flexural rigidity value of the joints of prefabricated secondary lining is kept in the range of 50~400 MN·m·rad-1.
KeywordsConventional Tunnelling,   Composite lining,   Prefabricated secondary lining,   Flexural rigidity,   "Contact friction-beam-joint",   model     
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yujin ZHOU Xiaojun YU Bingxin LI Xu ZHANG Chao .Study on the Partitioning Method for Prefabricated Secondary Lining in Conventional Tunnelling Based on the "Contact Friction-Beam-Joint" Model[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(3): 35-44
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I3/35
 
No references of article
[1] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[2] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[3] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[4] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[5] ZHENG Tengyue1 WANG Shuying1,2 YUAN Xiao1.Optimization of Construction Parameters for Shield Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Lines Based on Numerical Simulation and Machine Learning[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 100-107
[6] WANG JingYong1,2 WANG Ping2 YANG Jin2 JI Feng3.Optimization Study on the Support Structure of a Tunnel in Carbonaceous Phyllite Using Physical Model Tests[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(3): 160-169
[7] ZHANG Guang1 GONG Qiuming1 XIE Xingfei1 PEI Chengyuan2 SHANG Ceng2.Interval Prediction of TBM Parameters in Stable Excavation Sections Based on Bootstrap-COA-BiGRU Model[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 121-131
[8] CHEN Weijie1 FU Zeng2 ZHU Taifeng1 YU Changyi2 SU Dong1,3 WANG Quansheng2.Numerical Simulation Study on the Load Bearing Performance of Segment-steel-concrete Composite Beams under Prestress[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 162-171
[9] GUO Ying PENG Wenqing CHEN Shiqiang ZHANG Qiong WANG Jiawei.Calculation Method and Validation of Equivalent Length for Traffic Tunnel Ventilation Model Test[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(2): 230-240
[10] SHANG Haimin CUI Qingguo YU Jinqing WANG Qingang.Risk Analysis of Water Inrush in a Tunnel Project in a Karst Mountain Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 48-55
[11] TAN Yinjun1,2 WANG Keli1,2 ZHANG Heng1,2 ZHANG Zhiqiang1,2.Influence of Natural Wind on Fire Smoke Propagation in 10 km Long Highway Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 103-113
[12] LIU Xiang1 LI Kuichen1 ZHANG Rui1 HUANG Jun2 ZHAO Guang2 FANG Qian3 JIANG Annan1.Study on Steel Plate Cutting Deformation and Support Force for Excavation with Large Pipe Spacing in Pipe Curtain-Structure Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 28-37
[13] MU Zheng LI Fulin.Study on the Effect of Shield Tunnelling Parameters on Cutting Performance of Reinforced Concrete Based on FEM-DEM Coupling Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 147-156
[14] WANG Haokang1,2 SHEN Yusheng1,2 PAN Xiaohai1,2 CHANG Mingyu1,2 ZHANG Xinyang1,2 SU Wei3.Experimental Study on Dynamic Characteristics of Tunnels Crossing Multi-fault Fracture Zones in Strong Earthquake Regions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 212-220
[15] TAO Weiming1,2 ZHU Xingyu1,3 ZHANG Zhiqiang1,3 YU Hang1,3 FAN Lei2.Experimental Study on the Catastrophic Evolution of Water and Mud Inrush in Tunnels with Karst Conduits[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(1): 221-230
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY