Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2024, Vol. 61 Issue (5) :167-173    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Mechanical Response and Resilence Evolution Characteristics of Tunnel Structures under Additional Loads
(1. Guangzhou Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006)
Download: PDF (3949KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Changes in external loads inevitably induce mechanical disturbances in tunnel structures, making it cru? cial to evaluate their resilence reasonably and ensure safety. This study, based on a typical project, conducts a simulation analysis of the mechanical response of tunnel structures under additional loads. A resilence evaluation method and fortification standards for tunnels subjected to additional loads are developed. The analysis includes the resilence evolution of a specific tunnel and proposes limits for external loading during subsequent construction based on resilence requirements. The research results indicate that the response of the tunnel crown is most significant under unilateral additional loading, exhibiting characteristics of a cantilever with three-sided constraints and spatial deformation effects. A slight warping occurs on the unloaded side, leading to longitudinal twisting of the tunnel. Under additional loads, the maximum bending moment in the tunnel structure increases by 14.26%, and the maximum crack width increases by 27%. Both the maximum internal force and deformation are controllable; however, resilence is affected after structural damage. The midpoint of the tunnel structure enters a plastic state, and there is a linear relationship between the additional load and crack width, which approximates a cubic function relationship with redundancy.The resilence analysis of the case study demonstrates the feasibility of the evaluation method based on redundancy and proposes additional load limits in line with engineering characteristics and resilence requirements, providing a scientific basis for on-site implementation.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Liying1 YANG Chunshan1 YU Zhiyuan2 OU Zhenfeng1
KeywordsExisting tunnel   Additional load   Mechanical response   Redundancy evaluation   Resilence evolution     
Abstract: Changes in external loads inevitably induce mechanical disturbances in tunnel structures, making it cru? cial to evaluate their resilence reasonably and ensure safety. This study, based on a typical project, conducts a simulation analysis of the mechanical response of tunnel structures under additional loads. A resilence evaluation method and fortification standards for tunnels subjected to additional loads are developed. The analysis includes the resilence evolution of a specific tunnel and proposes limits for external loading during subsequent construction based on resilence requirements. The research results indicate that the response of the tunnel crown is most significant under unilateral additional loading, exhibiting characteristics of a cantilever with three-sided constraints and spatial deformation effects. A slight warping occurs on the unloaded side, leading to longitudinal twisting of the tunnel. Under additional loads, the maximum bending moment in the tunnel structure increases by 14.26%, and the maximum crack width increases by 27%. Both the maximum internal force and deformation are controllable; however, resilence is affected after structural damage. The midpoint of the tunnel structure enters a plastic state, and there is a linear relationship between the additional load and crack width, which approximates a cubic function relationship with redundancy.The resilence analysis of the case study demonstrates the feasibility of the evaluation method based on redundancy and proposes additional load limits in line with engineering characteristics and resilence requirements, providing a scientific basis for on-site implementation.
KeywordsExisting tunnel,   Additional load,   Mechanical response,   Redundancy evaluation,   Resilence evolution     
Cite this article:   
LIU Liying1 YANG Chunshan1 YU Zhiyuan2 OU Zhenfeng1 .Mechanical Response and Resilence Evolution Characteristics of Tunnel Structures under Additional Loads[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,V61(5): 167-173
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2024/V61/I5/167
 
No references of article
[1] SHU Zichen1 LIU Yang1.Mechanical Response of Surrounding Rock and Supporting Structure Stress Characteristics in Deep-buried Soft Rock Tunnel: A Model Test Study[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(3): 184-
[2] ZHENG Zhenji1 HUANG Shuhua2 CHEN Xiangsheng1 ZHANG Liang2 LIU Haoming1 SHENG Jian2 SU Dong1.Analysis of Stress Characteristics of Specially Lined Segment of Superlargediameter Shield Main Tunnel during Mechanically Excavating Cross Passage[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2024,61(1): 117-124
[3] ZHOU Jie1 XI Jinzhou1 LI Haiqing1 YU Li2 TANG Langzhou2.Analysis Method for Deformation of Existing Tunnel Induced by Tunnel Anchor Excavation and Support[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 120-129
[4] YANG Chunshan1 YANG Xueqiang2 WANG Yatian2 LIN Yonggui1.Optimization of the Design and Construction Scheme of Tunnel Entry and Conver? sion System for Removal of Anti-slide Pile in Architecturally Sensitive Area[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(6): 220-227
[5] WANG Guan.Study on Action Mechanism of Double-layer Support for the Parallel Adit of Tunnels in Extremely-squeezed Surrounding Rocks[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 86-94
[6] ZHAO Daneng1 WANG Yi2 REN Zhihua3.Mechanical Response Analysis for Tunnel Structure Considering the Interaction of Fault Dislocation and Seismic Motion[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2023,60(4): 95-105
[7] ZHAO Jin1 WEN Lina1 WU Honggang2,3,4 ZHOU Chici1.Study on Modes and Calculation Method of Stress and Deformation of TunnelPortal Landslide Parallel System[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2022,59(2): 53-61
[8] WEI Gang1,2 ZHAO Deqianlin1 HUANG Rui1.A Review of Model Test Studies on the Impact of Shield Construction on Adjacent Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(5): 1-8
[9] ZHU Caihui1 LAN Kaijiang1 DUAN Yu1 HE Hong2 DENG Guohua1,2.Study on the Reasonable Excavation Option of "Tunnel First before Shaft" for an Running Tunnel of Xi′an Metro Line 9[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(3): 205-215
[10] WANG Chaodong1 LAI Peng′an1 CAO Yang2 YANG Sheng2.Model Test Study on the Influence of the Close Crossing Angles of Overlapped Shield Tunnels on Existing Tunnels in Coastal Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2021,58(1): 168-174
[11] ZHOU Zhong CHEN Yun MIAO Linwu. Study of Equivalent Layered Method Based Prediction Model for Deformations Caused by Construction of New Tunnels Undercrossing Existing Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 99-103
[12] YAO Xiaoming1 SHU Bo2 LI Bo.Safety Control Technology for the Newly Constructed Shield Tunnels Approaching Existing Metro Lines Underneath[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(5): 243-
[13] CAI Xin1 LIU Huixi1 CHEN Fubin1 WU Lianbo1 NIU Bingyan2 LIU Xuezeng2,3 SANG Yunlong2,3.Model Test Study on Deformation and Failure of Large-span Flat Tunnel Caused by Additional Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(4): 150-157
[14] PENG Qi.Influence of Foundation Construction and Additional Load of Transfer Structure on Underneath Metro Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2020,57(1): 99-104
[15] LIU Jianguo XU Tianhua SONG Chengpeng.Construction Techniques of Shield Tunnels Approaching Existing Metro Tunnels in Soft Ground at Seafront Areas[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 160-167
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY