Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (1) :89-97    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study on the Characteristics of Water Pressure on the Composite Lining in Underwater Tunnels
(School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044)
Download: PDF (1157KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Abstract An underwater tunnel, whether in the construction or operation phase, is always located under the water, with an unlimited water supply and constant head; thus, the water pressure is one of the main loads to be considered for the lining structure design for an underwater tunnel. In this paper, the characteristics of water pressure on composite linings in underwater tunnels are studied by a theoretical analysis, model test, and field-measured data analysis of the Xiamen subsea tunnel. The research show that: (1) when only considering tunnel drainage, the grouting circle can reduce the water pressure on the lining. Water pressure on the lining reduces with an increase of grouting thickness, and the better the grouting effect is, the more obvious the reduction in water pressure, with the higher water pressure shared by the relevant grouting circle. However, the unlimited increase of the thickness of the grouting circle has little effect on the reduction of the water pressure, so a reasonable grouting thickness is 3~8m; (2) the water pressure on the lining obviously increases with the strengthening of primary support permeability resistance. Certain water pressure on the primary support must be considered in the design, and the water pressure on the primary support is mainly dependent on the ratio of the permeability coefficient of the grouting layer to that of the primary support; and (3) the reduction coefficient of water pressure on the secondary lining depends on the discharge of water permeating into the primary lining, namely, the ratio of the water drainage of the tunnel to the volume of water permeating into the primary lining, regardless of the grouting effect and the permeability coefficient of the primary support and secondary lining. During the determination of water pressure on the secondary lining, the impact of the initial seepage field has to be considered. This research can provide a reference for the structural design of underwater tunnels and mountain tunnels with high water pressure.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Xiu-Ying
Tan-Zhong-Sheng
KeywordsKeywords Underwater tunnel   Primary support   Secondary lining   Water pressure     
Abstract: Abstract An underwater tunnel, whether in the construction or operation phase, is always located under the water, with an unlimited water supply and constant head; thus, the water pressure is one of the main loads to be considered for the lining structure design for an underwater tunnel. In this paper, the characteristics of water pressure on composite linings in underwater tunnels are studied by a theoretical analysis, model test, and field-measured data analysis of the Xiamen subsea tunnel. The research show that: (1) when only considering tunnel drainage, the grouting circle can reduce the water pressure on the lining. Water pressure on the lining reduces with an increase of grouting thickness, and the better the grouting effect is, the more obvious the reduction in water pressure, with the higher water pressure shared by the relevant grouting circle. However, the unlimited increase of the thickness of the grouting circle has little effect on the reduction of the water pressure, so a reasonable grouting thickness is 3~8m; (2) the water pressure on the lining obviously increases with the strengthening of primary support permeability resistance. Certain water pressure on the primary support must be considered in the design, and the water pressure on the primary support is mainly dependent on the ratio of the permeability coefficient of the grouting layer to that of the primary support; and (3) the reduction coefficient of water pressure on the secondary lining depends on the discharge of water permeating into the primary lining, namely, the ratio of the water drainage of the tunnel to the volume of water permeating into the primary lining, regardless of the grouting effect and the permeability coefficient of the primary support and secondary lining. During the determination of water pressure on the secondary lining, the impact of the initial seepage field has to be considered. This research can provide a reference for the structural design of underwater tunnels and mountain tunnels with high water pressure.
KeywordsKeywords Underwater tunnel,   Primary support,   Secondary lining,   Water pressure     
published: 2014-01-20
Cite this article:   
WANG Xiu-Ying, Tan-Zhong-Sheng .Study on the Characteristics of Water Pressure on the Composite Lining in Underwater Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(1): 89-97
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2015/V52/I1/89
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY