Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (3) :1-7    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Study of Influential Factors and Measures for Low Carbonization During the Construction of Shield Tunnels
(1 Department of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering,Tongji University, Shanghai 200092; 2 Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200082)
Download: PDF (1023KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In tunnel engineering at present, carbon emissions are generally estimated during the planning design stage or obtained by statistics of total emissions after completion. However, the difference of carbon emissions in each ring and relevant influential factors are seldom considered. For this paper, based on the emission coefficient method, real-time statistics were determined regarding the in-situ energy consumption of the South Hongmei Road tunnel, and the actual carbon emissions per ring were obtained. Furthermore, the difference of the actual carbon emissions in each ring is analyzed and discussed by considering the parameters of stratum and construction. The results show that: 1) the average carbon emission per ring of shield tunnelling is about 56 t, with material-generated carbon emissions being around 93%, and for the studied case the carbon emission was reduced by approximately 12 000 t(corresponding to the total emissions produced by 200 rings) by means of depth grading and steel-bar reduction; 2) for construction-generated carbon emissions, shield tunnelling in the ⑦2 silty sand layer features high penetration resistance, high cutterhead torque, and highly damaging effects on the slurry, so its carbon emission per ring is about twice of that of the ⑤3 clayey silt layer, and the carbon emissions can be effectively reduced by avoiding a long-distance tunnel buried in the ⑦2 silty sand layer, while the shield advance distance and the buried depth have little effect; and 3) the carbon emissions generated by a one-day stop of shield driving is about 4 400 kg, it is therefore important to improve the advancing efficiency of the shield and to avoid long shield stoppages during tunnel construction. The daily average shield advance rate should be more than three rings—this can reduce the average emissions per ring by at least 60% compared with a one-ring advance rate per day.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Qiao-Song-1
BAI Yun-1
LI Lin-2
KeywordsShield machine   Tunnelling   Carbon emissions   Emission coefficient method   Low carbonization     
Abstract: In tunnel engineering at present, carbon emissions are generally estimated during the planning design stage or obtained by statistics of total emissions after completion. However, the difference of carbon emissions in each ring and relevant influential factors are seldom considered. For this paper, based on the emission coefficient method, real-time statistics were determined regarding the in-situ energy consumption of the South Hongmei Road tunnel, and the actual carbon emissions per ring were obtained. Furthermore, the difference of the actual carbon emissions in each ring is analyzed and discussed by considering the parameters of stratum and construction. The results show that: 1) the average carbon emission per ring of shield tunnelling is about 56 t, with material-generated carbon emissions being around 93%, and for the studied case the carbon emission was reduced by approximately 12 000 t(corresponding to the total emissions produced by 200 rings) by means of depth grading and steel-bar reduction; 2) for construction-generated carbon emissions, shield tunnelling in the ⑦2 silty sand layer features high penetration resistance, high cutterhead torque, and highly damaging effects on the slurry, so its carbon emission per ring is about twice of that of the ⑤3 clayey silt layer, and the carbon emissions can be effectively reduced by avoiding a long-distance tunnel buried in the ⑦2 silty sand layer, while the shield advance distance and the buried depth have little effect; and 3) the carbon emissions generated by a one-day stop of shield driving is about 4 400 kg, it is therefore important to improve the advancing efficiency of the shield and to avoid long shield stoppages during tunnel construction. The daily average shield advance rate should be more than three rings—this can reduce the average emissions per ring by at least 60% compared with a one-ring advance rate per day.
KeywordsShield machine,   Tunnelling,   Carbon emissions,   Emission coefficient method,   Low carbonization     
published: 2014-10-11
Cite this article:   
LI Qiao-Song-1, BAI Yun-1, LI Lin-2 .Study of Influential Factors and Measures for Low Carbonization During the Construction of Shield Tunnels[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(3): 1-7
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2015/V52/I3/1
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY