Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2015, Vol. 52 Issue (5) :32-39    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Numerical Analysis of the Rock Mass Conditions for Rock Burst Occurrences in Deep Underground Caverns
(1 School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000;2 The Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, the Ministry of Education of PRC, Lanzhou 730000)
Download: PDF (1147KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Structural properties of rock masses are the material basis and main factors for rock burst occurrences. In deep tunnels, most rock bursts occur in hard surrounding rock characterized by elasto-friability. Sound conditions for rock masses, such as high strength, fewer original joint fissures and good integrality, are conducive to elastic strain energy accumulation in rock masses. In order to quantitatively analyze the influence of rock mass conditions on the possibility of rock bursts in surrounding rocks, and using the deep tunnel of the Jinping II hydropower station as an example, the uniaxial compressive strength of a rock mass is selected to represent the strength of the surrounding rock and the geological strength index (GSI) is selected to represent the integrality of the surrounding rock mass. With an unchanged surrounding rock geo-stress, different uniaxial compressive strengths and various geological strength indexes, the stress behaviors and ultimate stress state at the stress concentration zones during tunnel construction are calculated by a numerical simulation. The numerical calculation results indicate that intense rock bursts mostly occur in surrounding rock masses of Class II characterized by high strength (uniaxial compressive strength>120 MPa) and good integrality (geological strength index>55).
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsRock burst   Rock strength   Integrality of rock mass   Forming conditions   Numerical simulation     
Abstract: Structural properties of rock masses are the material basis and main factors for rock burst occurrences. In deep tunnels, most rock bursts occur in hard surrounding rock characterized by elasto-friability. Sound conditions for rock masses, such as high strength, fewer original joint fissures and good integrality, are conducive to elastic strain energy accumulation in rock masses. In order to quantitatively analyze the influence of rock mass conditions on the possibility of rock bursts in surrounding rocks, and using the deep tunnel of the Jinping II hydropower station as an example, the uniaxial compressive strength of a rock mass is selected to represent the strength of the surrounding rock and the geological strength index (GSI) is selected to represent the integrality of the surrounding rock mass. With an unchanged surrounding rock geo-stress, different uniaxial compressive strengths and various geological strength indexes, the stress behaviors and ultimate stress state at the stress concentration zones during tunnel construction are calculated by a numerical simulation. The numerical calculation results indicate that intense rock bursts mostly occur in surrounding rock masses of Class II characterized by high strength (uniaxial compressive strength>120 MPa) and good integrality (geological strength index>55).
KeywordsRock burst,   Rock strength,   Integrality of rock mass,   Forming conditions,   Numerical simulation     
Cite this article:   
.Numerical Analysis of the Rock Mass Conditions for Rock Burst Occurrences in Deep Underground Caverns[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2015,V52(5): 32-39
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2015/V52/I5/32
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY