Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (3) :54-62    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Rock Creep Simulation Based on the Drucker-Prager Criterion
(1 MOE Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Nanjing 210098; 2 State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008)
Download: PDF (3566KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The stress states at different parts of surrounding rocks and the working face differ during tunnel construction. In conventional simulation, one Drucker-Prager (D-P) model and set of test parameters, which will only match with one stress state, are often used to predict the strain states of the whole model, which is impractical and may cause errors. Based on the ABAQUS′s creep model, in which the D-P yield criterion is coupled with the time hardening rate, this paper analyzes the prediction errors induced by several different series of D-P yield criteria and hardening parameters. The results show that: 1) apart from the yield criterion, the error is also greatly related to the ratio of the plastic factor (hardening parameter) [λ] under different stress state types, which means that the change rate of error is proportional to the value of[λ]; 2) if[λ≠1], there will be an error balance point P with the error of 0; 3) the absolute errors on the left side of point P decrease with an increase of the stress, while the opposite is true on the right side; 4) with a linear hardening model, a correction formula for the creep error can be established under different stress states.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsDrucker-Prager yield criterion   Creep   Flow rule   Plastic factor     
Abstract: The stress states at different parts of surrounding rocks and the working face differ during tunnel construction. In conventional simulation, one Drucker-Prager (D-P) model and set of test parameters, which will only match with one stress state, are often used to predict the strain states of the whole model, which is impractical and may cause errors. Based on the ABAQUS′s creep model, in which the D-P yield criterion is coupled with the time hardening rate, this paper analyzes the prediction errors induced by several different series of D-P yield criteria and hardening parameters. The results show that: 1) apart from the yield criterion, the error is also greatly related to the ratio of the plastic factor (hardening parameter) [λ] under different stress state types, which means that the change rate of error is proportional to the value of[λ]; 2) if[λ≠1], there will be an error balance point P with the error of 0; 3) the absolute errors on the left side of point P decrease with an increase of the stress, while the opposite is true on the right side; 4) with a linear hardening model, a correction formula for the creep error can be established under different stress states.
KeywordsDrucker-Prager yield criterion,   Creep,   Flow rule,   Plastic factor     
Cite this article:   
.Rock Creep Simulation Based on the Drucker-Prager Criterion[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(3): 54-62
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I3/54
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY