Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (3) :54-62    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Rock Creep Simulation Based on the Drucker-Prager Criterion
(1 MOE Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Nanjing 210098; 2 State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008)
Download: PDF (3566KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The stress states at different parts of surrounding rocks and the working face differ during tunnel construction. In conventional simulation, one Drucker-Prager (D-P) model and set of test parameters, which will only match with one stress state, are often used to predict the strain states of the whole model, which is impractical and may cause errors. Based on the ABAQUS′s creep model, in which the D-P yield criterion is coupled with the time hardening rate, this paper analyzes the prediction errors induced by several different series of D-P yield criteria and hardening parameters. The results show that: 1) apart from the yield criterion, the error is also greatly related to the ratio of the plastic factor (hardening parameter) [λ] under different stress state types, which means that the change rate of error is proportional to the value of[λ]; 2) if[λ≠1], there will be an error balance point P with the error of 0; 3) the absolute errors on the left side of point P decrease with an increase of the stress, while the opposite is true on the right side; 4) with a linear hardening model, a correction formula for the creep error can be established under different stress states.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsDrucker-Prager yield criterion   Creep   Flow rule   Plastic factor     
Abstract: The stress states at different parts of surrounding rocks and the working face differ during tunnel construction. In conventional simulation, one Drucker-Prager (D-P) model and set of test parameters, which will only match with one stress state, are often used to predict the strain states of the whole model, which is impractical and may cause errors. Based on the ABAQUS′s creep model, in which the D-P yield criterion is coupled with the time hardening rate, this paper analyzes the prediction errors induced by several different series of D-P yield criteria and hardening parameters. The results show that: 1) apart from the yield criterion, the error is also greatly related to the ratio of the plastic factor (hardening parameter) [λ] under different stress state types, which means that the change rate of error is proportional to the value of[λ]; 2) if[λ≠1], there will be an error balance point P with the error of 0; 3) the absolute errors on the left side of point P decrease with an increase of the stress, while the opposite is true on the right side; 4) with a linear hardening model, a correction formula for the creep error can be established under different stress states.
KeywordsDrucker-Prager yield criterion,   Creep,   Flow rule,   Plastic factor     
Cite this article:   
.Rock Creep Simulation Based on the Drucker-Prager Criterion[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(3): 54-62
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I3/54
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY