Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2016, Vol. 53 Issue (4) :29-36    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Geostress Measurement and 3D Multivariate Regression An Geostress Field of the Liangshui Tunnel
(1 School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070; 2 China Railway First Survey & Design Institute GroupCo. Ltd., Xi′an 710043; 3 School of Civil Engineering, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030; 4 Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010)
Download: PDF (3905KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract A hydraulic fracturing test was conducted on a selected testing hole and seven test sections in the Liangshui tunnel of the Lanzhou-Chongqing railway. The results show that the present stress field of the Liangshui tunnel is dominated by a horizontal stress whose magnitude of stress is extremely high, and the maximum principal stress orientation is N80°W~EW, the same as that of the regional tectonic stress field. Due to the small angle be tween the tunnel axis and the maximum horizontal stress orientation at the testing point, this is a great advantage to the stability of the surrounding rock. Using the practical geological conditions and formation parameters, two largescale 3D computational models were established based on measured geostress values; the gravity stress field and tec tonic stress field wre calculated by ANSYS under four condions regarding the gravity, horizontal compression and shear; a macro extended analysis on the protolith geostress field was carried out by a multiple regression equation. The analysis results show that the horizontal lateral geostress value is between 7.0 and 9.0 MPa, and the horizontal lateral pressure coefficient is between 1.0 and 1.5 in most sections of the Liangshui tunnel.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YU Yun-Yan- 1 Li-Guo-Liang- 2 Zhao-De-An- 3 Chen-Zhi-Min- 1 Wei-Ming-Qiang- 3 Yin-Jian-Min- 4 Li-Yong-Song- 4
KeywordsTunnel engineering   Hydraulic fracturing method   Geostress measurement   Regression analysis   FEM     
Abstract: A hydraulic fracturing test was conducted on a selected testing hole and seven test sections in the Liangshui tunnel of the Lanzhou-Chongqing railway. The results show that the present stress field of the Liangshui tunnel is dominated by a horizontal stress whose magnitude of stress is extremely high, and the maximum principal stress orientation is N80°W~EW, the same as that of the regional tectonic stress field. Due to the small angle be tween the tunnel axis and the maximum horizontal stress orientation at the testing point, this is a great advantage to the stability of the surrounding rock. Using the practical geological conditions and formation parameters, two largescale 3D computational models were established based on measured geostress values; the gravity stress field and tec tonic stress field wre calculated by ANSYS under four condions regarding the gravity, horizontal compression and shear; a macro extended analysis on the protolith geostress field was carried out by a multiple regression equation. The analysis results show that the horizontal lateral geostress value is between 7.0 and 9.0 MPa, and the horizontal lateral pressure coefficient is between 1.0 and 1.5 in most sections of the Liangshui tunnel.
KeywordsTunnel engineering,   Hydraulic fracturing method,   Geostress measurement,   Regression analysis,   FEM     
Cite this article:   
YU Yun-Yan- 1 Li-Guo-Liang- 2 Zhao-De-An- 3 Chen-Zhi-Min- 1 Wei-Ming-Qiang- 3 Yin-Jian-Min- 4 Li-Yong-Song- 4 .Geostress Measurement and 3D Multivariate Regression An Geostress Field of the Liangshui Tunnel[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2016,V53(4): 29-36
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2016/V53/I4/29
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY