Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (2) :17-25    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Damage to Highway Tunnels Caused by the Wenchuan Earthquake
(1 School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350108; 2 Key University Laboratory of Underground Engineering, Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350118)
Download: PDF (4187KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Quantitative indicators and a classification system of seismic damages to highway tunnels were developed based on a study of the seismic damage rules for highway tunnels in the Wenchuan seismic area. The results show that: the proportion of tunnel lining crack length is the highest along the total length of tunnel, and the length of secondary lining collapse and inverted arch dislocation goes the second; the proportion of most types of damage in surrounding rock of grade V is higher than that in surrounding rocks of other grades; in the area with Ⅹ & Ⅺ seismic intensities, damage at the fault section is the worst, and the damage at the portal section comes the second; the seismic damage severity decays quickly with increased distance from the epicenter, and the tunnels most seriously damaged are mostly located less than 10 km away from the epicenter, and nearly two-thirds of them are within 20 km;the degree of seismic damage to the tunnel in hard rock decreases with an increase of buried depth, and the relation? ship between the degree of damage and buried depth is unclear regarding tunnels in soft rock; the actual seismic intensities are higher than the fortification intensities specified for the tunnels with serious damage, and as for tunnels with moderate damage, nearly two-thirds of them have higher seismic intensities than the designed ones; seismic damage is serious when the crossing angle between the tunnel axis and the seismogenic fault is 60°~90°, and it is relatively light under angles of 30°~60°; and the primary support and secondary lining can′t work cooperatively during an earthquake because of the waterproof membrane, which increases the risk of seismic damage.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTunnel   Seismic damage   Rule     
Abstract: Quantitative indicators and a classification system of seismic damages to highway tunnels were developed based on a study of the seismic damage rules for highway tunnels in the Wenchuan seismic area. The results show that: the proportion of tunnel lining crack length is the highest along the total length of tunnel, and the length of secondary lining collapse and inverted arch dislocation goes the second; the proportion of most types of damage in surrounding rock of grade V is higher than that in surrounding rocks of other grades; in the area with Ⅹ & Ⅺ seismic intensities, damage at the fault section is the worst, and the damage at the portal section comes the second; the seismic damage severity decays quickly with increased distance from the epicenter, and the tunnels most seriously damaged are mostly located less than 10 km away from the epicenter, and nearly two-thirds of them are within 20 km;the degree of seismic damage to the tunnel in hard rock decreases with an increase of buried depth, and the relation? ship between the degree of damage and buried depth is unclear regarding tunnels in soft rock; the actual seismic intensities are higher than the fortification intensities specified for the tunnels with serious damage, and as for tunnels with moderate damage, nearly two-thirds of them have higher seismic intensities than the designed ones; seismic damage is serious when the crossing angle between the tunnel axis and the seismogenic fault is 60°~90°, and it is relatively light under angles of 30°~60°; and the primary support and secondary lining can′t work cooperatively during an earthquake because of the waterproof membrane, which increases the risk of seismic damage.
KeywordsTunnel,   Seismic damage,   Rule     
Cite this article:   
.Damage to Highway Tunnels Caused by the Wenchuan Earthquake[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(2): 17-25
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I2/17
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY