Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (4) :56-62    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Calculation Method for Loosening Earth Pressure of a Shallow-Buried Tunnel Considering the Soil Arch Effect
(1 School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001; 2 Center for PostDoctoral Studies of Civil Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001)
Download: PDF (1806KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Guide null
Abstract With an increase of crown displacement of a shallow-buried tunnel, the soil arch structure experiences four stages: the upper concave arch, the triangular arch, the lower concave arch and the rectangular arch. For shal?low-buried tunnel construction, the soil arch structure is mainly composed of a lower concave and rectangular arch,and the soil arch effect varies constantly with the variation of the arch structure. Criteria for judging the arch structure is established assuming the tunnel arch structure is a lower concave arch. The theoretical side displacement δ1′is obtained based on crown displacement δ. When the displacements δ1 at the two sides during tunnel construction are larger than the theoretical side displacement δ1′ of the lower concave arch, the arch structure develops as a rectangular arch, otherwise it develops as a lower concave arch. Based on an analysis of the laminar differential chromatographic method, a calculation formula for the loosening soil pressure of shallow-buried tunnels is presented. Ex? ample calculations show the loosening earth pressure of a shallow-buried tunnel has a direct relationship with the soil arch structure, and the loosening earth pressure will decrease substantially when the soil mass develops as a rectangular arch from a lower concave arch, which means the influence of the soil arch effect increases.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsShallow-buried tunnel   Soil arching effect   Loosening earth pressure   Lower concave arch   Rectangular arch     
Abstract: With an increase of crown displacement of a shallow-buried tunnel, the soil arch structure experiences four stages: the upper concave arch, the triangular arch, the lower concave arch and the rectangular arch. For shal?low-buried tunnel construction, the soil arch structure is mainly composed of a lower concave and rectangular arch,and the soil arch effect varies constantly with the variation of the arch structure. Criteria for judging the arch structure is established assuming the tunnel arch structure is a lower concave arch. The theoretical side displacement δ1′is obtained based on crown displacement δ. When the displacements δ1 at the two sides during tunnel construction are larger than the theoretical side displacement δ1′ of the lower concave arch, the arch structure develops as a rectangular arch, otherwise it develops as a lower concave arch. Based on an analysis of the laminar differential chromatographic method, a calculation formula for the loosening soil pressure of shallow-buried tunnels is presented. Ex? ample calculations show the loosening earth pressure of a shallow-buried tunnel has a direct relationship with the soil arch structure, and the loosening earth pressure will decrease substantially when the soil mass develops as a rectangular arch from a lower concave arch, which means the influence of the soil arch effect increases.
KeywordsShallow-buried tunnel,   Soil arching effect,   Loosening earth pressure,   Lower concave arch,   Rectangular arch     
Cite this article:   
.Calculation Method for Loosening Earth Pressure of a Shallow-Buried Tunnel Considering the Soil Arch Effect[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(4): 56-62
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I4/56
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY