Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (5) :138-145    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Failure Characteristics and Mechanical Mechanism of Deeply-Buried Tunnels with High External Water Pressure for Drill &Blast and TBM Methods
(1 State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059;2 Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, PowerChina ,Hangzhou 310014)
Download: PDF (2602KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Drill&blast and TBMs are two main methods for excavating underground works, and both have a signifi? cant impacts on the disturbance degree and reinforcement measures of surrounding rock. Based on four large parallel tunnels adopting the TBM and drill&blast methods, the influence of the excavation method on surrounding rock damage is studied. Through statistical processing of geological data and mechanical analysis, the failure modes of the tunnel′s surrounding rock are summarizedand common features of the effects of the two construction methods on the surrounding rock are concluded. In addition, a comparison of the effects of the two construction methods on the surrounding rock are conducted, and it is determined that the secondary failure range by TBM is larger than that of the drill & blast method and a TBM is inclined to produce rock bursts and stress failure, while structural plane failure is more likely to occur when the drill& blast method is adopted. Furthermore, mechanical mechanisms of various failures are analyzed based on the above
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTunnel   Drill&blast method   TBM method   Failure mode   Mechanical mechanism     
Abstract: Drill&blast and TBMs are two main methods for excavating underground works, and both have a signifi? cant impacts on the disturbance degree and reinforcement measures of surrounding rock. Based on four large parallel tunnels adopting the TBM and drill&blast methods, the influence of the excavation method on surrounding rock damage is studied. Through statistical processing of geological data and mechanical analysis, the failure modes of the tunnel′s surrounding rock are summarizedand common features of the effects of the two construction methods on the surrounding rock are concluded. In addition, a comparison of the effects of the two construction methods on the surrounding rock are conducted, and it is determined that the secondary failure range by TBM is larger than that of the drill & blast method and a TBM is inclined to produce rock bursts and stress failure, while structural plane failure is more likely to occur when the drill& blast method is adopted. Furthermore, mechanical mechanisms of various failures are analyzed based on the above
KeywordsTunnel,   Drill&blast method,   TBM method,   Failure mode,   Mechanical mechanism     
Cite this article:   
.Failure Characteristics and Mechanical Mechanism of Deeply-Buried Tunnels with High External Water Pressure for Drill &Blast and TBM Methods[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(5): 138-145
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I5/138
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY