Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (5) :180-191    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Mechanical Characteristics of a Multi-Arch Tunnel Support Structure in Loess
(School of Highway, Chang′an University, Xi′an 710064)
Download: PDF (6968KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract To understand the mechanical characteristics of a multi-arch tunnel support structure in loess, the pres? sure on the surrounding rock, the axial force of the anchor bolt, the internal force of the steel arch and the force on the secondary lining are tested using steel-wire transducers. The test results indicate that: 1) the pressure of the surrounding rock fluctuates a lot at the juncture between the top of the mid-wall and the arch and the joint between the bottom of the wall and the invert, with maximum pressures of 195 kPa and 115 kPa, respectively. The pressure of the tunnel invert center at a rock transition section is relatively large, with a maximum pressure of 267 kPa and shaped like a large heaving floor, with the pressure of the rock mass distributing in a "double-saddle" shape; 2) the measured vertical pressure of a rock mass at a deep buried depth is close to the result calculated based on a half span of a multiple-arch tunnel specified in the“Code for Road Tunnels.”The pressures on rock masses calculated by different formulas are larger than the ones measured at the shallow-buried section, while the pressures obtained by the Terzaghi formula are relatively close to the measured ones; 3) the proportions of load sharing between the initial support and the secondary lining of this loess tunnel are 47.66% and 52.34%, which shows the secondary lining is in a load-bearing state; 4) the axial force of an anchor bolt is relatively small and distributed in a“fish-maw” shape, with the load largely borne by the steel arch and the anchor bolt playing a limited function due to the strong support of the steel arch; and 5) it proves that there is a longitudinal effect on the loess tunnel because of the existence of middle wall torque, and attention should be paid to this during construction and design.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsMulti-arch loess tunnel   In-situ test   Support system   Mechanical characteristics     
Abstract: To understand the mechanical characteristics of a multi-arch tunnel support structure in loess, the pres? sure on the surrounding rock, the axial force of the anchor bolt, the internal force of the steel arch and the force on the secondary lining are tested using steel-wire transducers. The test results indicate that: 1) the pressure of the surrounding rock fluctuates a lot at the juncture between the top of the mid-wall and the arch and the joint between the bottom of the wall and the invert, with maximum pressures of 195 kPa and 115 kPa, respectively. The pressure of the tunnel invert center at a rock transition section is relatively large, with a maximum pressure of 267 kPa and shaped like a large heaving floor, with the pressure of the rock mass distributing in a "double-saddle" shape; 2) the measured vertical pressure of a rock mass at a deep buried depth is close to the result calculated based on a half span of a multiple-arch tunnel specified in the“Code for Road Tunnels.”The pressures on rock masses calculated by different formulas are larger than the ones measured at the shallow-buried section, while the pressures obtained by the Terzaghi formula are relatively close to the measured ones; 3) the proportions of load sharing between the initial support and the secondary lining of this loess tunnel are 47.66% and 52.34%, which shows the secondary lining is in a load-bearing state; 4) the axial force of an anchor bolt is relatively small and distributed in a“fish-maw” shape, with the load largely borne by the steel arch and the anchor bolt playing a limited function due to the strong support of the steel arch; and 5) it proves that there is a longitudinal effect on the loess tunnel because of the existence of middle wall torque, and attention should be paid to this during construction and design.
KeywordsMulti-arch loess tunnel,   In-situ test,   Support system,   Mechanical characteristics     
Cite this article:   
.Mechanical Characteristics of a Multi-Arch Tunnel Support Structure in Loess[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(5): 180-191
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I5/180
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY