Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2017, Vol. 54 Issue (6) :158-165    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Aseismic Analysis of a Shallow-Buried Large-Span Single-Arch Station with No Column
(1 Qingdao Metro Group Co. Ltd., Qingdao 266045; 2 Kunming Survey, Design and Research Institute Co. Ltd. of CREEC, Kunming 650200)
Download: PDF (2893KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract The advantages, disadvantages and applicability of common calculation methods for aseismic analysis of metro tunnels are briefly described. A finite-element model is established based on the People′s Hall Station of Qingdao metro line 4, and the dynamic characteristics of a metro station under a seismic load is calculated and analyzed.A comparison of the internal force and displacement at each point of the structure shows: 1) the seismic response results calculated by the response displacement method and response acceleration method are generally larger than those calculated by the time- history method, and the greater the station stiffness, the larger the difference; 2) in light of a large elastic-plastic constitutive error of the structure under an E3 state, the elastic-plastic interlayer displacement can be obtained by multiplying the elastic interlayer displacement and ductility coefficient for the station in the simple stratum; 3) the results calculated by the inertia force method are generally larger than those calculated by the response displacement method, while the difference is small if the station inertia force plays a leading role (i.e.,the station stiffness is very great with respect to the soil mass); 4) the Qingdao station is basically located in granite,with 90% of the structure dynamic response caused by shear force, so the aseismic analysis results of the soil mass are different from those of Kunming, Changzhou and Zhengzhou; and 5) the interlayer displacement angle of the metro structure increases with an increase of the station overburden but decreases with an increase of the rise-span ratio, elastic modulus of the rock mass and thickness of the secondary lining, while the thickness of the secondary lining has little effect on the angle of the interlayer displacement and the station overburden has greatest effect on the angle of the interlayer displacement.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsSingle arch and large span   Aseismic   Inertial force method   Response displacement method   Response acceleration method   Time-history analysis method     
Abstract: The advantages, disadvantages and applicability of common calculation methods for aseismic analysis of metro tunnels are briefly described. A finite-element model is established based on the People′s Hall Station of Qingdao metro line 4, and the dynamic characteristics of a metro station under a seismic load is calculated and analyzed.A comparison of the internal force and displacement at each point of the structure shows: 1) the seismic response results calculated by the response displacement method and response acceleration method are generally larger than those calculated by the time- history method, and the greater the station stiffness, the larger the difference; 2) in light of a large elastic-plastic constitutive error of the structure under an E3 state, the elastic-plastic interlayer displacement can be obtained by multiplying the elastic interlayer displacement and ductility coefficient for the station in the simple stratum; 3) the results calculated by the inertia force method are generally larger than those calculated by the response displacement method, while the difference is small if the station inertia force plays a leading role (i.e.,the station stiffness is very great with respect to the soil mass); 4) the Qingdao station is basically located in granite,with 90% of the structure dynamic response caused by shear force, so the aseismic analysis results of the soil mass are different from those of Kunming, Changzhou and Zhengzhou; and 5) the interlayer displacement angle of the metro structure increases with an increase of the station overburden but decreases with an increase of the rise-span ratio, elastic modulus of the rock mass and thickness of the secondary lining, while the thickness of the secondary lining has little effect on the angle of the interlayer displacement and the station overburden has greatest effect on the angle of the interlayer displacement.
KeywordsSingle arch and large span,   Aseismic,   Inertial force method,   Response displacement method,   Response acceleration method,   Time-history analysis method     
Cite this article:   
.Aseismic Analysis of a Shallow-Buried Large-Span Single-Arch Station with No Column[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2017,V54(6): 158-165
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2017/V54/I6/158
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY