Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2018, Vol. 55 Issue (4) :47-52    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Forward Test of GPR Detection for Typical Adverse Geological Bodies
(Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of the Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010)
Download: PDF (2695KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract At present, GPR has been widely used in tunnel geological forecasts as a conventional detection method. However, due to restricted spaces, the effects of construction equipment in tunnels and multiple solutions for detecting results, GPR does not easily obtain accurate predictions of adverse geologic bodies. A forward simulation of GPR profile records of adverse geological bodies was conducted by the two-dimensional time domain finite difference method, the GPR profile features of adverse geological bodies were analyzed, and a theoretical basis for the interpretation of measured GPR data was obtained. Many geological radar field tests for the three karst tunnels on the Anjiang expressway were carried out, and successful predictions of the adverse geological bodies of a karst cave containing water, a hollow karst cavity and a corrosive fracture zone were achieved based on the geological sketch documents of the work face at the construction site. The accuracy of GPR for detecting adverse geological bodies during tunneling is improved by the above mentioned method, which provides a safety guarantee for tunnel engineering.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTunnel   GPR   Adverse geological body   Karst cave   Fracture zone   Geological sketch   Forward simulation     
Abstract: At present, GPR has been widely used in tunnel geological forecasts as a conventional detection method. However, due to restricted spaces, the effects of construction equipment in tunnels and multiple solutions for detecting results, GPR does not easily obtain accurate predictions of adverse geologic bodies. A forward simulation of GPR profile records of adverse geological bodies was conducted by the two-dimensional time domain finite difference method, the GPR profile features of adverse geological bodies were analyzed, and a theoretical basis for the interpretation of measured GPR data was obtained. Many geological radar field tests for the three karst tunnels on the Anjiang expressway were carried out, and successful predictions of the adverse geological bodies of a karst cave containing water, a hollow karst cavity and a corrosive fracture zone were achieved based on the geological sketch documents of the work face at the construction site. The accuracy of GPR for detecting adverse geological bodies during tunneling is improved by the above mentioned method, which provides a safety guarantee for tunnel engineering.
KeywordsTunnel,   GPR,   Adverse geological body,   Karst cave,   Fracture zone,   Geological sketch,   Forward simulation     
Cite this article:   
.Forward Test of GPR Detection for Typical Adverse Geological Bodies[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,V55(4): 47-52
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2018/V55/I4/47
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] YANG Shaoyu1 WANG Xiaotian2 ZHANG Peiyuan1 LIU Shengchen1 LI Shuchen2 LI Luoning2.A Review of Spray-applied Waterproofing Membrane Technology for Drill-and-Blast Tunnels [J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 1-14
[4] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[5] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[6] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[7] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[8] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[9] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[10] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[11] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[12] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[13] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[14] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[15] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY