Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2018, Vol. 55 Issue (4) :97-105    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Shaking Table Test for a Tunnel Structure with Different Stiffnessces in a Layer of Soil Liquefaction
(1 Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015; 2 Earthquake Engineering Research & Test Center of Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405)
Download: PDF (5172KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted for tunnel models with different stiffnesses in a liquefac? tion soil layer, and the effect of tunnel stiffness on the surrounding liquefiable foundation soil was analyzed by comparing the pore water pressure of the soil around the tunnel and the acceleration time history and its Fourier frequency amplitude spectrum and strain of the tunnel structure. The results show that the larger the stiffness of a tunnel structure, the larger the constraint to the surrounding soil layer and the smaller the acceleration of the soil layer nearby and the greater the influence on the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum curve. The laws of the acceleration amplification coefficient varying with the soil layer depth are different under different relative stiffnesses of the soil-tunnel structure. The surrounding soil layer is more inclined to be liquefied when the stiffness of the tunnel is small, and the influence of tunnel stiffness on the development law of the soil layer′s pore pressure is large. The shallower the soil layer, the faster the dissipation of the pore pressure, and the smaller the tunnel stiffness, the more likely it is to yield to the movement of the surrounding soil layer.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTunnel under different stiffnesses   Relative stiffness   Foundation liquefaction   Development law of pore pressure   Shaking table test   Acceleration amplification coefficient     
Abstract: Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted for tunnel models with different stiffnesses in a liquefac? tion soil layer, and the effect of tunnel stiffness on the surrounding liquefiable foundation soil was analyzed by comparing the pore water pressure of the soil around the tunnel and the acceleration time history and its Fourier frequency amplitude spectrum and strain of the tunnel structure. The results show that the larger the stiffness of a tunnel structure, the larger the constraint to the surrounding soil layer and the smaller the acceleration of the soil layer nearby and the greater the influence on the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum curve. The laws of the acceleration amplification coefficient varying with the soil layer depth are different under different relative stiffnesses of the soil-tunnel structure. The surrounding soil layer is more inclined to be liquefied when the stiffness of the tunnel is small, and the influence of tunnel stiffness on the development law of the soil layer′s pore pressure is large. The shallower the soil layer, the faster the dissipation of the pore pressure, and the smaller the tunnel stiffness, the more likely it is to yield to the movement of the surrounding soil layer.
KeywordsTunnel under different stiffnesses,   Relative stiffness,   Foundation liquefaction,   Development law of pore pressure,   Shaking table test,   Acceleration amplification coefficient     
Cite this article:   
.Shaking Table Test for a Tunnel Structure with Different Stiffnessces in a Layer of Soil Liquefaction[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,V55(4): 97-105
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2018/V55/I4/97
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY