Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2018, Vol. 55 Issue (4) :97-105    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Shaking Table Test for a Tunnel Structure with Different Stiffnessces in a Layer of Soil Liquefaction
(1 Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015; 2 Earthquake Engineering Research & Test Center of Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405)
Download: PDF (5172KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted for tunnel models with different stiffnesses in a liquefac? tion soil layer, and the effect of tunnel stiffness on the surrounding liquefiable foundation soil was analyzed by comparing the pore water pressure of the soil around the tunnel and the acceleration time history and its Fourier frequency amplitude spectrum and strain of the tunnel structure. The results show that the larger the stiffness of a tunnel structure, the larger the constraint to the surrounding soil layer and the smaller the acceleration of the soil layer nearby and the greater the influence on the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum curve. The laws of the acceleration amplification coefficient varying with the soil layer depth are different under different relative stiffnesses of the soil-tunnel structure. The surrounding soil layer is more inclined to be liquefied when the stiffness of the tunnel is small, and the influence of tunnel stiffness on the development law of the soil layer′s pore pressure is large. The shallower the soil layer, the faster the dissipation of the pore pressure, and the smaller the tunnel stiffness, the more likely it is to yield to the movement of the surrounding soil layer.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsTunnel under different stiffnesses   Relative stiffness   Foundation liquefaction   Development law of pore pressure   Shaking table test   Acceleration amplification coefficient     
Abstract: Large-scale shaking table tests were conducted for tunnel models with different stiffnesses in a liquefac? tion soil layer, and the effect of tunnel stiffness on the surrounding liquefiable foundation soil was analyzed by comparing the pore water pressure of the soil around the tunnel and the acceleration time history and its Fourier frequency amplitude spectrum and strain of the tunnel structure. The results show that the larger the stiffness of a tunnel structure, the larger the constraint to the surrounding soil layer and the smaller the acceleration of the soil layer nearby and the greater the influence on the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum curve. The laws of the acceleration amplification coefficient varying with the soil layer depth are different under different relative stiffnesses of the soil-tunnel structure. The surrounding soil layer is more inclined to be liquefied when the stiffness of the tunnel is small, and the influence of tunnel stiffness on the development law of the soil layer′s pore pressure is large. The shallower the soil layer, the faster the dissipation of the pore pressure, and the smaller the tunnel stiffness, the more likely it is to yield to the movement of the surrounding soil layer.
KeywordsTunnel under different stiffnesses,   Relative stiffness,   Foundation liquefaction,   Development law of pore pressure,   Shaking table test,   Acceleration amplification coefficient     
Cite this article:   
.Shaking Table Test for a Tunnel Structure with Different Stiffnessces in a Layer of Soil Liquefaction[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2018,V55(4): 97-105
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2018/V55/I4/97
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY