Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (1) :94-98    DOI:
Article Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Analysis of the Stability of River-crossing Pipelines against Uplift Based on the Strength Reduction Method
(1 Jiangsu Surveying and Design Institute of Water Resource Co, Ltd, Yangzhou 225000; 2 Hohai University, Nanjing 211100;3 Jiangsu Water Conservancy Department, Nanjing 210093)
Download: PDF (1862KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Traditional finite element method has been successfully applied in the analysis of the capability against uplift of pipelines, but it didn’t give the safety factors of the anti-uplift stability relating to the buried depth of pipelines. An ABAQUS model of anti-uplift of pipelines was established by using strength reduction method to take a two-dimensional numerical simulation of the behaviors of river-crossing pipelines under the effect of buoyancy, to observe the development process of plastic zone of soils and to determine the safety factor of anti-uplift stability.The results show that the factors of anti-uplift capability increase linearly as the function of the buried depth and the slope is governed by the friction angle of soil mass; equivalent values of and used in gravity analysis method, which may be taken as the applicable conditions in practical application cases, are obtained by comparing with the traditional gravity analysis method.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KeywordsPipeline   Anti-uplift   Safety factor   Gravity analysis method   Strength reduction method   ABAQUS     
Abstract: Traditional finite element method has been successfully applied in the analysis of the capability against uplift of pipelines, but it didn’t give the safety factors of the anti-uplift stability relating to the buried depth of pipelines. An ABAQUS model of anti-uplift of pipelines was established by using strength reduction method to take a two-dimensional numerical simulation of the behaviors of river-crossing pipelines under the effect of buoyancy, to observe the development process of plastic zone of soils and to determine the safety factor of anti-uplift stability.The results show that the factors of anti-uplift capability increase linearly as the function of the buried depth and the slope is governed by the friction angle of soil mass; equivalent values of and used in gravity analysis method, which may be taken as the applicable conditions in practical application cases, are obtained by comparing with the traditional gravity analysis method.
KeywordsPipeline,   Anti-uplift,   Safety factor,   Gravity analysis method,   Strength reduction method,   ABAQUS     
Cite this article:   
.Analysis of the Stability of River-crossing Pipelines against Uplift Based on the Strength Reduction Method[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(1): 94-98
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I1/94
 
No references of article
[1] LIU Feixiang1,2.SCDZ133 Intelligent Multi-function Trolley and Its Application in Tunnelling[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 1-7
[2] ZHOU Wenbo WU Huiming ZHAO Jun.On Driving Strategy of the Shield Machine with Atmospheric Cutterhead in Mudstone Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 8-15
[3] CHEN Zhuoli1,2 ZHU Xunguo1,2 ZHAO Deshen1,2 WANG Yunping1,2.Research on Anchorage Mechanism of Yielding Support in the Deep-buried Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 16-22
[4] WANG Quansheng.Case Study Based Analysis of Segment Division Principles of Rectangular Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 23-29
[5] ZHANG Heng1 ZHU Yimo1 LIN Fang1 CHEN Shougen1 YANG Jiasong2.Study on Optimum Excavation Height of Middle Bench in an Underground Cavern Based on Q System Design[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 30-37
[6] LI Hao.Geological Survey on Breakthrough Section of the Large-section Karst Tunnel by Radio Wave Penetration Method[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 38-42
[7] CEN Peishan1 TIAN Kunyun2 WANG Ximin3.Study on Gas Hazard Assessment of Yangshan Tunnel on Inner MongoliaJiangxi Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 43-49
[8] ZHU Jianfeng1 GONG Quanmei2.Centrifugal Model Test on Long-term Settlement of Shield Tunnels in Soft Soils[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 49-55
[9] CHEN Youzhou1 REN Tao2 DENG Peng2 WANG Bin3.Prediction of Tunnel Settlements by Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Based on ABC[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 56-61
[10] WANG Dengmao TENG Zhennan TIAN Zhiyu CHEN Zhixue.Reflection on Disease Treatment and Design Issues of Unconventional Rockburst of Bamiao Tunnel on Taoyuan-Bazhong Highway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 62-68
[11] WU Shuyuan1 CHENG Yong1 XIE Quanmin2 LIU Jiguo1 CHEN Biguang1.Analysis on the Causes of the Large Deformation of Surrounding Rocks of Milashan Tunnel in Tibet[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 69-73
[12] WANG Sui1,2,3 ZHONG Zuliang3 LIU Xinrong3 WU Bo1,2,4 ZHAO Yongbo1,2 LI Zhantao1,2.D-P Yield Criterion Based Elastoplastic Solution of the Circular Pressure Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 74-80
[13] LI Ming YAN Songhong PAN Chunyang ZHANG Xubin.Analysis of Fluid-Solid Coupling Effect during Excavation of the Water-rich Large-section Loess Tunnel[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 81-88
[14] ZHANG Kai1 CHEN Shougen2 HUO Xiaolong3 TAN Xinrong4.Extension Assessment Model for the Risk of Water Inflow in Karst Tunnels and Its Application[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 89-96
[15] LI Jie1 ZHANG Bin1 FU Ke1 MA Chao1 GUO Jingbo1 NIU Decao2.Site Data Based Prediction of Shield Driving Performance in Compound Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,56(4): 97-104
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY