Home | About Journal  | Editorial Board  | Instruction | Subscription | Advertisement | Message Board  | Contact Us | 中文
MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY 2019, Vol. 56 Issue (3) :125-132    DOI:
Current Issue | Next Issue | Archive | Adv Search << [an error occurred while processing this directive] | [an error occurred while processing this directive] >>
Field Test and Analysis of Mechanical Behaviors of the Self-drilling Hollow Grouting Anchor Bolt for the Tunnel in Sandy Pebble Stratum
(1 CCCC First Highway Consultants Co. Ltd., Xi′an 710075; 2 Chang′an University, Xi′an 710018; 3 Hebei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute, Shijiazhuang 050011)
Download: PDF (4574KB)   HTML (1KB)   Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract In order to study the support effect of self-drilling hollow anchor bolt in sandy pebble stratum, a drilling test and pullout test were conducted based on a tunnel in sandy pebble stratum of Tibet. The tests show that the average drilling depth of ?25 anchor bolt is 1.50 m which is 42.7% of the designed length, torsion failure or idling occurs when it reaches the limit depth and drilling can′ t go further; the average drilling depth of ?51 bolt without drill bit is 1.15 m which is 38.3% of the designed length, and continuous drilling can′ t be fulfilled; the average drilling depth of ?25 anchor bolt increases by 23.1% when the drill bit is removed and the average drilling depth of ?51 bolt increases by 95.2% when the drill bit is removed; the average pullout force of ?25 bolt is close to the designed value of 50 kN, but the anchoring effect doesn′ t work. 4 optimization measures for construction support were determined based on the test results of anchor bolts, specifically systematic bolts is eliminated to reduce disturbance of sur? rounding rock; the drill bit is removed and the anchor bolt is drilled directly; the group number of feet-lock bolt is increased from 1 to 2 to ensure total support length; the ?25 advanced anchor bolt with a length of 1.8 m is selected instead of the ?51 anchor bolt with a length of 2.5 m. The monitoring data show that convergence deformation of the tunnel increases slightly after scheme adjustment while the crown settlement decreases obviously, the tunnel construction speed increases significantly and the safety is quite improved.
Service
Email this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
Email Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CAO Xiaoyong1 FENG Zhihua1
3 SHI Yanwen2 SONG Feiting2 LAI Jinxing2
KeywordsSandy pebble stratum   Road tunnel   Self-drilling hollow anchor bolt   Field Test   Support optimization     
Abstract: In order to study the support effect of self-drilling hollow anchor bolt in sandy pebble stratum, a drilling test and pullout test were conducted based on a tunnel in sandy pebble stratum of Tibet. The tests show that the average drilling depth of ?25 anchor bolt is 1.50 m which is 42.7% of the designed length, torsion failure or idling occurs when it reaches the limit depth and drilling can′ t go further; the average drilling depth of ?51 bolt without drill bit is 1.15 m which is 38.3% of the designed length, and continuous drilling can′ t be fulfilled; the average drilling depth of ?25 anchor bolt increases by 23.1% when the drill bit is removed and the average drilling depth of ?51 bolt increases by 95.2% when the drill bit is removed; the average pullout force of ?25 bolt is close to the designed value of 50 kN, but the anchoring effect doesn′ t work. 4 optimization measures for construction support were determined based on the test results of anchor bolts, specifically systematic bolts is eliminated to reduce disturbance of sur? rounding rock; the drill bit is removed and the anchor bolt is drilled directly; the group number of feet-lock bolt is increased from 1 to 2 to ensure total support length; the ?25 advanced anchor bolt with a length of 1.8 m is selected instead of the ?51 anchor bolt with a length of 2.5 m. The monitoring data show that convergence deformation of the tunnel increases slightly after scheme adjustment while the crown settlement decreases obviously, the tunnel construction speed increases significantly and the safety is quite improved.
KeywordsSandy pebble stratum,   Road tunnel,   Self-drilling hollow anchor bolt,   Field Test,   Support optimization     
Cite this article:   
CAO Xiaoyong1 FENG Zhihua1, 3 SHI Yanwen2 SONG Feiting2 LAI Jinxing2 .Field Test and Analysis of Mechanical Behaviors of the Self-drilling Hollow Grouting Anchor Bolt for the Tunnel in Sandy Pebble Stratum[J]  MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2019,V56(3): 125-132
URL:  
http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/      或     http://www.xdsdjs.com/EN/Y2019/V56/I3/125
 
No references of article
[1] LI Ruijun1 SONG Zongying2 LI Chen1 WANG Wenbin2 REN Yuzhen3,4 CAI Jianhua3,4 ZHANG Jiaxu3,4.Multi-source Data Fusion-based Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Tructural Defects in Liangjiashan Tunnel on Heavy-haul Railway[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 301-308
[2] ZHANG Xiaolong.Mechanical Response Analysis of Subway Shield Tunnel Structure under Pile Foundation Load[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 82-89
[3] LI Kexi1,2 DANG Jiandong3 ZHANG Jian3 YE Guangxiang4 WANG Xiaojun1,2 CHEN Qinglin1,2.Study on Fracture Characteristics of Different Types of Sandstone Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 26-36
[4] ZHOU Cairong1 YI Liming1 MA Shanqing2 ZHOU Li3 YU Jinhong4, 5.Load-bearing Behavior and Reinforcement Schemes of High-performance Fiber-reinforced Concrete Jacking Pipes under Three-point Loading[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 50-60
[5] GUO Yongjun1 LI Chao2 ZHENG Jianguo3 YU Yongtang4 ZHU Caihui5.Influence of Ground Surcharge on Existing Shield Tunnel Segments in Xi′an Loess Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 61-72
[6] WANG Yonggang1 CUI Yikun1 WU Jiuqi2, 3 HUANG Jun4 SHEN Xiang2, 3 YANG Kui4 SU Dong2, 3.Comparative Analysis of Disc Cutter Forces and Wear under Different Wear Modes[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 73-81
[7] FENG Jimeng1,2 SONG Jiadai1,2 WANG Shengtao3 LI Yifei1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 WANG Haoming4 WANG Bo1,2.Study on the Deformation Control Effectiveness of Extra-long Pipe Roofs in Large-section Tunnels in Reclamation Strata[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 155-162
[8] XU Caijian1 CHEN Xingyu1 LEI Minglin1 ZHANG Xinglong2 SUN Huaiyuan2 LI Xiaojun2.Digital Twin and Risk Decision-making for Water-richess of Surrounding Rock Ahead of Tunnel Face[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 90-99
[9] YANG Ying1 NI Kai1 GE Lin2 ZHANG Mingfei3 WANG Xiaorui4.Improved UNet Model-based Image Segmentation for Tunnel Seepage Defects under Low-light Conditions[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 100-110
[10] SU Kaichun1 FU Rui2,3 ZENG Hongrui2,3 LENG Xiqiao4 GUO Chun2,3.Short-term Multi-step Traffic Volume Prediction for Highway Tunnels Based on DBO-A-LSTM[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 111-121
[11] XIONG Ying1,2 ZHANG Junru1,2 FAN Ziyan1,2 CHEN Jiahao1,2 MA Jianchi1,2 CHEN Pengtao1,2.Propagation and Attenuation Characteristics of Blast-induced Stress Waves in Layered Soft Rock[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 122-131
[12] LIU Yang1 SHAO Zekai2 TIAN Haofan2 ZHANG Ruxi1 ZHENG Bo3 WANG Zhengzheng2.Damage Mechanisms of Coal Pillars Induced by Blasting Construction in Highway Tunnels Underlying Room-and-Pillar Mine Goafs[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 132-144
[13] LUO Zhiyang1 ZHANG Chunyu2,3 WANG Lichuan1,2,4,5 XU Shuo1 LI Liping4 WANG Qianqian5 LIU Zhiqiang6.Research on Water Inrush Mechanisms and Grouting Sealing Techniques for TBM Tunnels in Fractured Rock Masses[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 145-154
[14] ZHOU Yili1 FENG Kun1 GUO Wenqi1 ZHANG Liangliang2 LI Chunlin3.Study on the Bending Behavior and Damage Characteristics of Longitudinal Segment Joints in Super-large Diameter Shield Tunnels[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 163-173
[15] YI Dan1 XUE Haoyun2 YANG Shaoyi2 YU Bo1 FENG Kun2 LIN Gang1.Analysis of the Influence of Bolt Failure of Shield Tunnel Segment Structure on Transverse Seismic Response[J]. MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY, 2025,62(4): 174-181
Copyright 2010 by MODERN TUNNELLING TECHNOLOGY